A Robust Toolkit for Functional Profiling of the Yeast Genome

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genetika Molekuler (5) Sutarno. Lecture #4 Notes (Yeast Genetics) LECTURE 4: CLONING AND MANIPULATING GENES IN YEAST Basically, we use the same techniques.
Advertisements

Molecular biology tools for the genetic manipulation of yeast
Uses of Microarrays in Research Anne Rosenwald Biology Department Georgetown University.
Yeast as a model organism Model eukaryote –Experimental genetics –Gene function – Orthologs, family members –Pathway function - “Biological synteny” Testbed.
Yeast as a Model System II
Genetics and Genomics Forward genetics Reverse genetics
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Genome-wide Consequences of Deleting Any Single Gene
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Targeted mRNA Degradation by Deadenylation-Independent Decapping
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Cancer therapeutics in yeast
A DNA Integrity Network in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
Pei-Yun Jenny Wu, Paul Nurse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Rnq1 Molecular Cell Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Interplay between Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and DNA Damage Response Pathways Reveals that Stn1 and Ten1 Are the Key CST Telomere-Cap Components  Eva-Maria.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Volume 134, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Genjiro Suzuki, Jonathan S. Weissman, Motomasa Tanaka  Molecular Cell 
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Chromosomal Rearrangements Occur in S
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Christine Geil, Michael Schwab, Wolfgang Seufert  Current Biology 
Generation and characterization of a diploid shuffle ts allele array.
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
A Suppressor of Two Essential Checkpoint Genes Identifies a Novel Protein that Negatively Affects dNTP Pools  Xiaolan Zhao, Eric G.D Muller, Rodney Rothstein 
Fig. S1 HO Kan HygB Tetrads MATa MATα x
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
Barrie M. Wilkinson, John R. Tyson, Colin J. Stirling 
Table 1. Synaptotagmin Project Strains
Sugar Receptors in Drosophila
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
A Yeast Catabolic Enzyme Controls Transcriptional Memory
Jessica S. Williams, Takeshi Hayashi, Mitsuhiro Yanagida, Paul Russell 
CENP-C Functions as a Scaffold for Effectors with Essential Kinetochore Functions in Mitosis and Meiosis  Koichi Tanaka, Hui Li Chang, Ayano Kagami, Yoshinori.
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Cindy Vallières, Sara L. Holland, Simon V. Avery  Cell Chemical Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

A Robust Toolkit for Functional Profiling of the Yeast Genome Xuewen Pan, Daniel S. Yuan, Dong Xiang, Xiaoling Wang, Sharon Sookhai-Mahadeo, Joel S. Bader, Philip Hieter, Forrest Spencer, Jef D. Boeke  Molecular Cell  Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 487-496 (November 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035

Figure 1 Analysis of Genetic Interactions with a Haploid-Convertible Heterozygous Diploid YKO Pool (A) Construction of a haploid-convertible heterozygous diploid YKO pool. A haploid selection SGA reporter flanked by 1 kilobase sequences flanking the endogenous CAN1 locus (CAN1L-LEU2-MFA1pr-HIS3-CAN1R) was transformed into a pool of 5896 heterozygous diploid YKOs to replace one copy of CAN1. Each of these YKOs carries an individual gene-disrupting kanMX module tagged with unique barcodes. This pool of YKOs was aliquoted and stored in 15% glycerol at −80°C. (B) Diploid-based synthetic lethality analysis by microarrays (dSLAM). A query mutation (yfg1Δ::URA3) is introduced into the pool of haploid-convertible heterozygous diploid YKOs via high efficiency integrative transformation. Haploid single or double mutant pools are regenerated from this heterozygous diploid double mutant pool after sporulation and selection on “magic medium” (MM+5FOA or MM−Ura). Genomic DNA samples are isolated from both pools and used as the templates for PCR amplification of the TAGs labeled with fluorescent dyes (Cy5 for single mutant pool and Cy3 for the double mutant pool). Microarray analysis of these dye-labeled TAGs reveals the synthetic interaction between each of the corresponding YKOs with the query mutation. A high C/E ratio (or reddish spot on microarray) of a TAG indicates that the yfg1Δ::URA3 mutation causes lethality or slow growth phenotype in the corresponding haploid YKO mutant. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035)

Figure 2 The Heterozygous Diploid YKOs Are Amenable to Genetic Studies as a Population (A) The heterozygous diploid YKOs behaved uniformly during an integrative transformation. The CAN1L-LEU2-MFA1pr-HIS3-CAN1R cassette featuring the SGA reporter was transformed into a pool of 5896 heterozygous diploid YKOs. Genomic DNA was isolated from the starting pool and the transformed pool. The abundance of each YKO in both pools was compared by microarray analysis of the TAGs. Normalized Log2 hybridization signal intensities of the UPTAGs were plotted (DOWNTAGs were similar). Known petite strains, open red triangles; other YKOs, filled black triangles. (B) Freshly converted haploid essential gene YKOs are underrepresented after sporulation. A pool of 5896 heterozygous diploid YKOs harboring the SGA reporter were sporulated and grown in the haploid selection magic medium (MM). The abundance of each mutation in the heterozygous diploid and freshly generated haploid pools was compared by microarray analysis of the representing TAGs. Normalized Log2 UPTAG hybridization intensities were plotted (DOWNTAGs were similar). YKOs of “essential” genes, open red triangles; YKOs of nonessential genes, filled black triangles. The large cluster in the lower left corner presumably represents mutated TAGs (Eason et al., 2004). Molecular Cell 2004 16, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035)

Figure 3 Systematic Genetic Screens for Benomyl-Sensitive YKOs (A) A procedure of genetic screens for benomyl-sensitive YKOs with the haploid-convertible pool. An aliquot of the heterozgyous diploid YKOs bearing the SGA reporter was sporulated. Haploid pools were freshly regenerated on basic haploid selection medium (MM) with (experimental) or without (control) increasing concentrations of benomyl and analyzed by microarrays. High C/E ratios revealed benomyl-sensitive YKOs. (B) Benomyl sensitivity of a subset of YKOs reflected by the log2 hybridization C/E ratios (no drug/drug). The sensitivity of the indicated YKOs to increasing concentrations (0 to 20 μg/ml) of benomyl was plotted. For simplicity, TAG hybridization C/E ratios of YKOs at indicated benomyl concentrations were averaged within a functional group: microtubule biogenesis (CIN1, CIN2, and TUB3); Gimc prefoldin complex (GIM3, GIM4, GIM5, PAC10, PFD1, and YKE2); NFU1 and ISU1; RTG1, RTG2, and RTG3. Data for this plot were derived from Supplemental Table S2. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035)

Figure 4 A Direct Comparison between dSLAM and SGA (A) The number of cin8Δ and bim1Δ synthetic interactions identified by dSLAM and SGA. (B) False positive and false negative rates for the cin8Δ dSLAM screen with regard to hybridization cutoff C/E ratios. (C) Comparison of the false negative rates between dSLAM and SGA with cin8Δ and bim1Δ screens as examples. (D) Comparison of data reproducibility between dSLAM and SGA with cin8Δ and bim1Δ screens as examples. Data for the plots in this figure were adopted from Supplemental Tables S5 and S6 and Tong et al. (2004). (E) Effects of the YKO libraries on individual confirmation test of dSLAM results. The top 151 candidate bim1Δ synthetic interactions initially identified by dSLAM were individually tested by transforming a bim1Δ::URA3 cassette into the MATa/α heterozygous diploid YKOs or by crossing a MATα bim1Δ::URA3 query strain to the preexisting haploid MATa YKOs. The resultant heterozygous diploid double mutants were studied for synthetic interactions between bim1Δ and the candidate YKOs by tetrad dissection and random spore analysis. Of the 151 interactions tested (black oval), 121 were confirmed by the diploid approach (blue oval), whereas 93 were confirmed by the haploid approach (green oval). Thus, 28 bim1Δ interactions (pink-shaded) could be confirmed only by using the MATa/α heterozygous diploid YKOs. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035)

Figure 5 Synthetic Interaction Analysis Concerning Essential Genes (A) dSLAM using a thermal sensitive (Ts) query allele of the essential gene CDC102 (cdc102-1). One copy of the CDC102 gene in the heterozygous diploid pool was replaced with a natMX cassette that confers resistance to CloNat (Nat). The resultant pool of diploid double YKOs was transformed with a centromere (CEN)-based plasmid that carries the cdc102-1 allele and was marked with URA3. Haploids were freshly generated from this pool after sporulation and selection on different media at semipermissive temperatures as indicated and analyzed by dSLAM. (B) Synthetic interaction identified with the cdc102-1 Ts allele as the query. Sporulated double YKO pools carrying the wild-type CDC102 gene and cdc102-1 on a centromere-based plasmid were independently germinated on a haploid selection medium with (MM−Ura+Nat; double YKO pool as experiment) or without (MM−Ura; single and double YKO pool as control) 50 μg/ml CloNat at 28°C or 30°C. The growth of each YKO in the control and experimental pool was compared by microarray analysis. The C/E ratio that represents the relative strength of interaction between each of 80 YKO mutations and both CDC102 alleles was plotted. (C) Synthetic haplo-insufficiency screen with tub1Δ::URA3 as the query mutation. One copy of the essential TUB1 gene was replaced with a URA3 dominant selectable marker in the heterozygous diploid YKO pool by homologous recombination to create an experimental pool (TUB1/tub1Δ::URA3 XXX/xxxΔ::kanMX). A ura3Δ::URA3 cassette was transformed back into the endogenous URA3 locus to create a control pool (URA3/ura3Δ0 XXX/xxxΔ::kanMX). The growth of each YKO in the control and experimental pools was compared by microarray analysis. The Log2 hybridization C/E ratios of a set of confirmed tub1Δ synthetic haplo-insufficiency interactions were plotted. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035)

Figure 6 Other Systematic Gene-Gene Interaction Screens (A) Screen for essential gene YKOs suppressed by the query mutation in a dSLAM experiment. A synthetic lethality screen with sml1Δ::URA3 as the query mutation was performed. A low C/E ratio of a TAG (or green spot on microarray chip) indicates that a growth defect caused by the YKO is suppressed by sml1Δ::URA3. (B) Suppression of mec1Δ, lcd1Δ, and rad53Δ mutations by sml1Δ. The Log2 C/E ratios of the TAGs representing mec1Δ, lcd1Δ, and rad53Δ were plotted. (C) Dosage synthetic lethality and suppression screen with LCD1 overexpression. A pool of heterozygous diploid YKOs with the SGA reporter was independently transformed with a control vector (YCplac33) and a LCD1 overexpression plasmid (pXP465; GAL1pr-LCD1). The two resultant pools were sporulated and spread on a haploid selection medium (MM) with galactose as the sole carbon source to induce LCD1 overexpression. The growth of each regenerated haploid MATa haploid YKO in these two pools was compared by microarray hybridization of the representing TAGs. A high C/E ratio of vector/GAL1pr-LCD1 indicates a growth defect of the YKO caused by LCD1 overexpression. A low C/E ratio reflects suppression of the growth defect of that YKO by LCD1 overexpression. Log2C/E ratios of a set of individually confirmed interactions were plotted. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 487-496DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.035)