Developing Preceptor Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Advertisements

Issues and opportunities for a common career path
. . . a step-by-step guide to world-class internal auditing
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Overview for Parents and Guardians Fall 2010
Teachers development. It can not be longer accepted that academic career gives automatically qualifications for new didactic tasks It is anachronic to.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Development and Implementation of a Theme Based Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE) Program S. Scott Wisneski, Pharm.D., MBA, Louis D. Barone,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
PRESENTED BY: Michael T. Flannery, M.D., F.A.C.P. Professor of Medicine GME Internal Review Director.
1311A.2 Club Leadership Training Session Achieving Success As Vice President Education.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Performance Management
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Overview of RPT Process and Guidelines John C. Carey, M.D., M.P.H. Chair, ad hoc RPT & DAC Committees.
Meeting the Intent of the Accreditation Standard: Making ResiTrak® Work for Your Residency Program Beth Bryles Phillips, PharmD, BCPS Jamie Kalus, PharmD,
THE HR APPRENTICERICHMOND THE HR APPRENTICE RICHMOND Marvelous Membership Mavericks.
Safety and Health Program Section B of the Forest Activities Code.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
Preceptor Orientation
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
Resident Credentialing Project: From Procedures to Portfolios Ruth H. Nawotniak, MS Program Coordinator - Surgery University at Buffalo State University.
Pharmacy Practice Model Initiative
That dreaded “PC”: Keeping your Residency Program Healthy Mark Sinnett, PharmD, FASHP Director, Clinical and Educational Services Montefiore Medical Center.
1 College of Pharmacy. The mission of the University of Michigan, College of Pharmacy is to prepare students to become pharmacists and pharmaceutical.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
College of Education Graduate Programs
PREPARING A FELLOWSHIP NOMINATION PROCESS & RESPONSIBILITIES The primary nominator is a CAHS Fellow. In addition to providing a letter of nomination that.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
The Power of Parents: National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness Family Leadership Training Program It all begins today!
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
2016 Accreditation Services/COC Update and Pharmacademic Update James Kalus, PharmD, BCPS, FASHP PGY1 RPD and Director of Pharmacy Henry Ford Health System.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Creating Customized Resident Self-Evaluation Assessments in PharmAcademic TM Andrea Weeks, PharmD PGY1 Residency Co-Director and Preceptor Paoli Hospital.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Site Visitor Training Post Professional Standards June 22, 2016 Baltimore Marriott Inner Harbor Stadium Ballroom 1-3 and 4-5 Baltimore, MD.
Continuing education: Delivering Quality Programs Across Texas
Coordinator Course Managing Satellite Locations,
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Preparing a fellowship Nomination
The STFM Graduate Medical Education Committee
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Navigating the Resident Quarterly Development Plan
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Michelle W. McCarthy, PharmD, FASHP
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure
Brittany L. Riley, PharmD, MS, BCPS
Site Visits and Clerkship Coordinators – Defining a Best Practice
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Non-Tenure Track Promotion Workshop
Will Seavey PharmD, BCPS MSHP Treasurer
Presentation transcript:

Developing Preceptor Development Kyle A Gustafson, PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP PGY-1 Residence Program Director Southwest General Hospital

Objectives Identify current weaknesses in preceptor development nationally Develop a system to encourage and track individual preceptor development Institute departmental practices that allow for preceptor development

Why Preceptor Development? Simply: because ASHP requires it Reduces areas of partial compliance 4.4 RPDs have responsibility for… C: implementing use of criteria for appointment and reappointment of preceptors D: evaluation, skills assessment, and development of preceptors in the program E: creating and implementing a preceptor development plan for the residency program 4.7 Preceptors must… D: demonstrate practice expertise, preceptor skill, and strive to continuously improve 4.8 Preceptor qualifications A: …by use of clinical teaching roles (instructing, modeling, coaching, facilitating) at the level required by the resident F: ongoing professionalism, including a personal commitment to advancing the profession ASHP Accreditation Standard For Postgraduate Year One Pharmacy Residency Programs (2016)

Why Preceptor Development? Precepting is a difficult skill to master Many preceptors are clinically trained Less are educationally trained Open opportunity to interact with other preceptors Idea exchange and practice development Encourages preceptor consistency across key points Evaluation style Evaluation definitions Learning experience write-ups

So... How Are We Doing Not that well… (2005 Standards) Standard % Citied NC or PC 5.9 Preceptors do not meet 4/7 criteria for commitment and contribution to pharmacy (PGY-2 Standard) 77% 4.4e The RPD serves as the organizationally authorized leader of the residency program and has responsibility for creating and implementing a preceptor development plan for the residency program 45% ASHP Communique Fall 2016

So… How Are We Doing? 2014 Standards Standard % Citied NC or PC 3.4.c At the end of each learning experience, residents receive, and discuss with preceptors, verbal and written assessment on the extent of their progress toward achievement of assigned educational goals and objectives, with reference to specific criteria 88% 4.8.f Preceptors demonstrate ongoing professionalism, including a personal commitment to advancing the profession 57% 3.3.c Learning experiences include expectations of residents ASHP Communique Spring 2017

Raising the Bar New guidance documents by ASHP (April 2018) Tighter definitions of 4.8e (recognition) “Preceptors must have one of the following” Board certification Multidisciplinary certification (DE, CHC, etc) Fellow status Advanced degree Formal recognition from peers (Awards) Credentialing and privileging >30% fail to meet, will impact duration of accreditation https://www.ashp.org/professional-development/residency-information/residency-program-directors/residency-accreditation/accreditation-standards-for-pgy1-pharmacy-residencies

Raising the Bar 4.8.f “ongoing professionalism, including a personal commitment to advancing the profession” Increase from 1 activity to 3 activities in past 5 years Serve as a reviewer Presentation/poster/publication Co-author with student or resident at a professional meeting Active service in professional organization Evaluator at regional residency conference Routine in-service presentations to pharmacy or other providers Primary preceptor for pharmacy students Pharmacy technician educator Preceptor development on site Public health activities Publication of original research Publication or presentation of case reports Didactic education of pharmacy or professional students (non-precepting) https://www.ashp.org/professional-development/residency-information/residency-program-directors/residency-accreditation/accreditation-standards-for-pgy1-pharmacy-residencies

What Makes A Preceptor Eligibility (4.6) (Critical Factor) ASHP accredited PGY-1 residency followed by a minimum of one year of experience ASHP accredited PGY-2 residency followed by six months of experience Three or more years of pharmacy practice experience

What Makes A Preceptor Qualification (4.8) (Critical Factor) Demonstrate the ability to precept a residents learning experiences by meeting one or more qualifying characteristics in all of the following six areas Demonstrating the ability to precept residents’ learning experiences by use of clinical teaching roles (instructing, modeling, coaching, facilitating) at the level required by residents The ability to assess residents’ performance Recognition in the area of pharmacy practice for which they serve as preceptors An established, active practice in the area they serve as preceptors Maintenance of continuity of practice during the time of residents’ learning experience Ongoing professionalism, including a personal commitment to advancing the profession

3 Keys To Compliance Documentation Organization Preceptor engagement

Documentation Standardized formatting to meet ASHP criteria Academic and professional record (APR) Replaces curriculum vitae Addresses the old 2005 standards (4/7) Doesn’t address several key preceptor qualification Demonstrate ability to precept residents’ experience by using learning roles Ability to assess residents’ performance Maintenance of continuity of practice during the time of residents’ learning experiences Southwest uses a “Preceptor Application” to ensure preceptors have appropriate qualifications

Documentation Preceptor development tracking In addition to updated APR Must track preceptor growth over time Must demonstrate competence in areas where APR is lacking Southwest has opted for an every two year preceptor model Coincides with RPD/Preceptor meeting Ensures follow-up with: Learning experience updates Evaluation timing and quality Professional growth and contribution Keep attendance records for specific events RAC meeting minutes

Organization ”Doable” and repeatable Complicated or aggressive policies are difficult to enforce RAC should help with the development Standing meetings and agenda items Limited number of documents Kept in the same place Schedule “preceptor development” activities well in advance Post activities online for those who can’t attend live Take advantage of existing resources Pharmacist Letter Colleges of pharmacy (student precepting) Regional and national preceptor conferences Leverage what you are already doing Pearls, student presentations, skills fairs

Preceptor Engagement Many preceptors but only 1 RPD Shift responsibility for development to the preceptors Documentation should fall on the preceptors Encourage preceptors to “lead” on-site development sessions Tackle key areas of partial compliance Allows preceptors to become more familiar with ASHP standards RAC involvement in creation and enforcement of the standards

What Are Your Best Practices?