WAYS TO ANSWER ARGUMENTS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Advertisements

Debating Year 10 extension. By the unit of this unit, you will be able to: Understand debating terms and apply them to your own and others’ debates. Form.
What Makes a Debate? Although millions of people all over the world enjoy a good debate, they do not all debate in the same way, in the same format, or.
Argumentative Writing
Debating the case.
Chapter 32: How to Read an Essay. General Questions (pp ) What does the word, phrase, clause, or sentence mean? Is the claim true? Are the claims.
Argumentative Writing. The Elements of an Argument claim  A claim evidence  Based on evidence of some sort warrant how the evidence supports the claim.
 MYuE0IZQ34 MYuE0IZQ34.
 4 th stock issue  Significance means that the issue addressed by the Affirmative team is a major force affecting a large group.  The penalty for not.
R HETORICAL Q UESTIONS. W HAT DOES RHETORICAL MEAN ‘Rhetorical’ comes from the word ‘rhetoric’ – which is a special kind of talking ‘Rhetoric’ is used.
“Comparative Analysis” Training Session 28 Feb 2014.
What is Debate?. Debate is a formal contest in which the affirmative and negative sides of a proposition are advocated by opposing speakers. Each team.
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Refuting, Attacking, and Cross-Examination
Affirmative vs. negative
Chapter 3 What are the reasons?.
You will need your journals today!
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
I Can Tackle Test-Taking!
Answering the Edexcel Impact of War Paper
The Body Paragraphs American Literature 11.
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Debate: Claims.
Scientific Method The scientific method is a guide to problem solving. It involves asking questions, making observations, and trying to figure out things.
Logical Fallacies ENGL 101.
Elements of Argument The Toulmin Model.
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Create a balanced argument by representing the opposition
Introduction to Argument and Debate
Team Leader Training The Chief’s Briefing
Debate Prep!.
Josh Carey & Joseph Tyler
Chapter 18: Supporting Your Views
WAYS TO ANSWER ARGUMENTS
Points of information.
Objections to the Design Argument
Emperor Chin’s Tomb. Do you think we should?.
Performing speeches Date:
How did we prove that the world was not flat?
Asking Questions Diego Aguirre.
Part Three: Topic Sentences & Evidence
Using Textual Evidence Effectively in a Literary Essay
How to approach the synthesis exam
Midterm Discussion.
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Claims, Warrants, and Impacts
The discursive essay.
No Warmup You need: Your binder Worksheet from the back
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Introduction to Argument and Debate
Claims, Warrants, and Impacts
Create a balanced argument by representing the opposition
CX Purpose and Strategies
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
SAT Word of the Day Pretentious Part of Speech: Define: Adjective
Do Now Quick Write What is one thing you enjoyed doing over the vacation? What is one thing you wished you had done over the vacation?
Flowing & Cross-Examination
Short Answer Responses
CX Purpose and Strategies
Argument Writing What you need to know.
CERCA Argumentative Structure
Who is the intended audience? When and where was it created?
Advanced Debate Speaking Drills Discuss First Exam Impact Calculus
Argument Writing: Defend, Refute, Qualify.
History is the account of the past.
How to Write a Document Based Question Essay
Numbers & Stats ASK YOURSELF:
Presentation transcript:

WAYS TO ANSWER ARGUMENTS Pam have other suggestions for this? Argument in Debate

Things to Consider Sharing Evidence Examine their evidence and arguments carefully: Why doesn’t the argument work? Is the source valid? Outdated? Does the evidence actually support the claim? You need to get a copy of your opponent’s evidence. Depending on the conventions of your circuit, you will get this either after they speak or before, and in hard copy or by sharing the speech document (most often by flash drive). You want their evidence so that you can read their arguments and evidence to find arguments/answers you can make. [Note: check your area rules—not all areas require teams to give evidence to opponents.] The first thing to consider is if there are reasons why the argument just doesn’t work or make sense. These answers would begin with something like: “Their argument doesn’t work because……” Attack the source. Use the information in the discussion about valid/good sources from above, and ask yourself: is it valid, biased, or outdated? If the answer to any of these questions is no, it can become an answer to the argument. Example: “This argument is outdated because it talks about nuclear arms talks from the 1990’s, not the current arms talks.” OR “This argument is invalid because it comes from a blogger who has no qualifications to support the claims being made.” Attack the warrants- ask yourself if they are they missing or unclear? If the answer is yes, these things can become arguments. Examples: “There is nothing in the evidence that proves that global warming can be reduced by the action of the affirmative.” OR “The evidence only says that this will happen, but it doesn’t explain why or how it happens.” Language from Pam and Joe Why slide – overall goal

Other Possible Answers Qualifiers Reservations or Exceptions Opposite Examples Look for “qualifiers” or conditions within the evidence. These will be words or phrases that put conditions on their claims. Words that create qualifications or conditions include: “might”, “could”, “should”, “probably”, “if”, “when”, “under certain circumstances”. Example arguments: “The evidence that they read to prove that global warming will result in extinction only indicates that extinction might happen if a set of conditions are true. They don’t prove that those conditions are happening.” These answers are particularly useful on any claim of solvency. Look for “reservations” or “exceptions” in the evidence. Words or phrases that cue you in to reservations/exceptions include: “unless”, “except”, “is doubtful”. These can become arguments by pointing out how the exception affects the argument. Example: “The evidence indicates that the argument is true “except when x is happening, and x is happening now.” Find “opposite examples.” Try to find historical examples where the opposite of the other team’s claim has happened Language from Pam and Joe Why slide – overall goal

Questions?

Pam have other suggestions for this?