Quarter Car Suspension

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) and Climate Change Talking Points Mark Berliner, Ohio State Issues of continuing interest: Models, Data, Impacts & Decision.
Advertisements

Insert Date HereSlide 1 Using Derivative and Integral Information in the Statistical Analysis of Computer Models Gemma Stephenson March 2007.
Uncertainty Quantification & the PSUADE Software
 Modeling Harmonic Oscillations and its Applications By Dallas Gosselin and Jonathan Fernandez.
CCMT Validation of Shock Tube Simulation Chanyoung Park, Raphael (Rafi) T. Haftka and Nam-Ho Kim Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University.
Robust control Saba Rezvanian Fall-Winter 88.
Vladimir Fonoberov (Aimdyn Inc, USA) Igor Mezic (UC Santa Barbara, USA)
Numbers
Quantifying Uncertainties in Radiative Shock Experiments Carolyn C. Kuranz CRASH Annual Review Fall 2010.
Educational Progress and Plans Ken Powell. Page 2 About Our Students Each UM and TAMU student has a home department Current students from –Atmospheric,
Presenter: Dan SnyderDate: 10/5/2010Overhead sheet 1 File: /home/u9/engr/snyded/pub_html/EP/alternative_project.odp Assessing Sensitivity of Vibratory.
Surface Variation and Mating Surface Rotational Error in Assemblies Taylor Anderson UGS June 15, 2001.
1 Zissimos P. Mourelatos, Associate Prof. Daniel N. Wehrwein, Graduate Student Mechanical Engineering Department Oakland University Modeling and Optimization.
Preliminary Sensitivity Studies With CRASH 3D Bruce Fryxell CRASH Review October 20, 2009.
Ken Powell and Ryan McClarren CRASH Review, October 2010 CRASH Students and Courses.
Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Monte Carlo Simulation Robert C. Patev North Atlantic Division – Regional Technical.
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
INTRODUCTION TO CONTROL SYSTEMS
CAMP-G/Matlab Vehicle Crash Test
dynamic software & engineering GmbH
Equation-Free (EF) Uncertainty Quantification (UQ): Techniques and Applications Ioannis Kevrekidis and Yu Zou Princeton University September 2005.
1 Synopsys Saber Simulation Performance Measure(s) Performance Measure(s) Model(s) Nominal Design Nominal Design Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity Analysis.
Simulation of Motor Bike Suspension System ME 270 Advanced Computer Aided Design of Dynamic System Guided By: Professor Jose J. Granda Department Of Mechanical.
Crystal Linkletter and Derek Bingham Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science Simon Fraser University Acknowledgements This research was initiated.
A. Betâmio de Almeida Assessing Modelling Uncertainty A. Betâmio de Almeida Instituto Superior Técnico November 2004 Zaragoza, Spain 4th IMPACT Workshop.
Jean-François Collard Paul Fisette 24 May 2006 Optimization of Multibody Systems.
Modelling protocols Marcel van Oijen (CEH-Edinburgh) With input from participants Garmisch Mar & May 2006, Protocol-GMP team, Protocol-UQ/UA team.
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Assessment of predictive capability Derek Bingham 1.
Amaldi 9 Cardiff University July 2011 Parameter estimation for LISA Pathfinder Giuseppe Congedo University of Trento for the LTPDA team.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
M. Ronen, G. Chandy, T. Meyer & J.E. Ferrell. Curve Feature Extraction basal storage Sustained (delta/ratio) Max amplitude (delta / ratio) Max slope Time.
Newton’s 2nd Law: Translational Motion
Lecture 6: Time Response 1.Time response determination Review of differential equation approach Introduce transfer function approach 2.MATLAB commands.
Lecture 16: Introduction to Control (Part II)
Derivative-Enhanced Variable Fidelity Kriging Approach Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, USA Wataru YAMAZAKI 23 rd, September, 2010.
Uncertainties in fluid-structure interaction simulations
Ch 8 : Conservation of Linear Momentum 1.Linear momentum and conservation 2.Kinetic Energy 3.Collision 1 dim inelastic and elastic nut for 2 dim only inellastic.
LTP Barcelona_26_27_06_2007 S. Vitale1 Master Plan Analyses DA#6.
Operation Space Hamster Monday 08 June Statement of Work ver1 Design, fabricate, and deliver a complete and functional test system for the attitude.
By : Rohini H M USN : 2VX11LVS19.  This system includes sensors for measuring vehicle speed; steering input; relative displacement of the wheel assembly.
A Challenge Problem on Uncertainty Quantification & Value of Information 1 Patrick Koch Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA 2013 NAFEMS World Congress Salzburg,
IIASA Riku Suutari, Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont Wolfgang Schöpp A methodology to propagate uncertainties through the RAINS scenario calculations.
A Kriging or Gaussian Process emulator has: an unadjusted mean (frequently a least squares fit: ), a correction / adjustment to the mean based on data,
Sarah Maddox Under Hamish Gordon, Jasper Kirkby University of Michigan CERN REU Design of Experiments for the 2015 CLOUD Run.
EQT 373.  An ability to acquire fundamental concepts of probability distributions and statistics.  An ability to apply knowledge of statistics in analyze.
ME /01/2008 Hydro-Mechanical Hydraulic Drive Train Hydro-Mechanical Hydraulic Hybrid Drive Train Chen Chu Koji Intlekofer Vigneshwar Kalyanasundaram.
Uncertainty quantification in generic Monte Carlo Simulation: a mathematical framework How to do it? Abstract: Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is the capability.
A Study of Uncertainty Quantification of CIPS
Uncertainty Quantification and Validation Using RAVEN
Application of the Bootstrap Estimating a Population Mean
Vibration in turbine blades must be prevented
2nd Homework: Cervical Syndrome
From: Uncertainty Quantification of Large-Eddy Spray Simulations
Variable Selection for Gaussian Process Models in Computer Experiments
تحليل الحساسية Sensitive Analysis.
Today (2/11/16) Learning objectives (Sections 5.1 and 5.2):
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.3 – Quantifying Uncertainty
Filtering and State Estimation: Basic Concepts
Efficient Quantification of Uncertainties Associated with Reservoir Performance Simulations Dongxiao Zhang, The University of Oklahoma . The efficiency.
قوانين برگزاري مناقصات و آيين نامه مالي و معاملاتي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي و خدمات بهداشتي ،درماني تهران
Optimized Vibration Mitigation in Design of Satellite Payload Support
The M2 parameter in space ---beam quality factor
Nonlinear Dynamic Control Systems
Homework-2.1: 1-DOF quarter car model.
C.2.10 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
Warm Up A 1996 study investigated if the weight (kg) of Rocky Mountain Elk could be estimated by measuring their chest girth (cm). A random sample of 18.
Quarter Car Suspension System
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
Presentation transcript:

Quarter Car Suspension Gautam Lageju ME 498/599: Sensitivity Propagation and Uncertainty Quantification

𝒎 𝒃 →𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔(𝒄𝒂𝒓 𝒃𝒐𝒅𝒚+𝒂𝒅𝒅_𝒘𝒕) 𝒌 𝒔 →𝒔𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒕(𝒔𝒖𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏) 𝒃 𝒔 →𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝒇 𝒔 →𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄𝒆 𝒎 𝒘 →𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 (𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒆𝒍 𝒔𝒚𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒎) 𝒌 𝒕 →𝒔𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒕(𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒆𝒍) 𝑿 𝒃 → 𝒎 𝒃 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑿 𝒘 → 𝒎 𝒘 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒓→𝒓𝒐𝒂𝒅 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒃𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆

Linearized State Space Model 𝑿 𝟏 = 𝑿 𝒃 𝑿 𝟐 = 𝑿 𝒃 → 𝑿 𝟐 = 𝑿 𝒃 𝑿 𝟑 = 𝑿 𝒘 𝑿 𝟒 = 𝑿 𝒘 → 𝑿 𝟒 = 𝑿 𝒘 𝒎 𝒃 𝑿 𝟐 =− [𝒌 𝒔 𝑿 𝟏 − 𝑿 𝟑 + 𝒃 𝒔 𝑿 𝟐 − 𝑿 𝟒 − 𝒇 𝒔 ] 𝒎 𝒘 𝑿 𝟒 =− 𝒌 𝒔 𝑿 𝟏 − 𝑿 𝟑 + 𝒃 𝒔 𝑿 𝟐 − 𝑿 𝟒 − 𝒌 𝒕 𝑿 𝟑 −𝒓 −𝒇 𝒔

Actuator Force – Active Suspension Actuator force = -350 N Amplitude = 0.13 cm

No Actuator Force Actuator force = 0 N Amplitude = 3.22 cm

Centered Parameter Study

Centered Parameter Study Road input has clearly a dominant effect on response Shock absorber and weight on car has nominal effects

Centered Parameter Study

Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) - UQ

Correlation

Correlation

Correlation

Correlation

Correlation

LHS Sampling

Correlation with data samples

References "Robust Control of an Active Suspension." Robust Control of an Active Suspension - MATLAB & Simulink. MATLAB, n.d. Web. 07 June 2017. Hines, William W. Probability and Statistics in Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003. Print.

Thank you !