Jaehoon Lee, Tapan Mukerji, Michael Tompkins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secure Energy for America
Advertisements

Rock Physics Models for Marine Gas Hydrates
3-D Seismic Waveform Analysis for Reservoir Characterization
1 Convolutional Time-Lapse Seismic Modeling for CO 2 Sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield, Ness County, Kansas Jintan Li Advisor: Dr. Christopher Liner.
Statistical Characterization Using Automatic Learning Gaussian Mixture Models in Diamond M Field, TX David Lubo*, The University of Oklahoma, Simon Bolivar.
Using Simulation to Address Challenges of Subsalt Imaging in Tertiary Basins with Emphasis on Deepwater Gulf of Mexico (Paper 23566) Michael Fehler SEG.
2012 SEG/SPE/AAPG Summer Research Workshop
AVO analysis & rock physics based AVO inversion
Youli Quan & Jerry M. Harris
SEISMIC INVERSION TO FLOW SIMULATION
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
Marginal Field Development Advances in 3D Geological Modeling: How it can help?
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Si-Yong Lee Model development & Aneth site example.
Stochastic inverse modeling under realistic prior model constraints with multiple-point geostatistics Jef Caers Petroleum Engineering Department Stanford.
Induced Seismicity Consortium (ISC) Quarterly Review Meeting, Q Quantifying Seismic Hazard from Subsurface Fluid Injection and Production (SFIP)
1 RPSEA Project – Facies probabilities from seismic data in Mamm Creek Field Reinaldo J Michelena Kevin Godbey Patricia E Rodrigues Mike Uland April 6,
Céline Scheidt and Jef Caers SCRF Affiliate Meeting– April 30, 2009.
Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell
Adaptive Spatial Resampling as a McMC Method for Uncertainty Quantification in Seismic Reservoir Modeling Cheolkyun Jeong*, Tapan Mukerji, and Gregoire.
Sandy Chen*, L.R.Lines, J. Embleton, P.F. Daley, and L.F.Mayo
Using multidimensional scaling and kernel principal component analysis to interpret seismic signatures of thin shaly-sand reservoirs Piyapa Dejtrakulwong1,
Joel Ben-Awuah. Questions to Answer What do you understand about pseudo-well? When to apply pseudo-well? What are the uncertainties in reservoir modeling?
Retrospective Production Optimization Under Uncertainty Using Kernel Clustering Mehrdad Gharib Shirangi and Tapan Mukerji Department of Energy Resources.
Stright and Bernhardt – MA-MS Calibration AAPG 2010 Sub-seismic scale lithology prediction for enhanced reservoir-quality interpretation from seismic attributes,
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting The Stanford VI-E Reservoir: A Synthetic Data Set for Joint Seismic-EM Time- lapse Monitoring Algorithms Jaehoon.
Dario Grana and Tapan Mukerji Sequential approach to Bayesian linear inverse problems in reservoir modeling using Gaussian mixture models SCRF Annual Meeting,
Earth models for early exploration stages PETROLEUM ENGINEERING ÂNGELA PEREIRA Introduction Frontier basins and unexplored.
Hybrid Bayesian Linearized Acoustic Inversion Methodology PhD in Petroleum Engineering Fernando Bordignon Introduction Seismic inversion.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E.
Luca Colombera, Nigel P. Mountney, William D. McCaffrey
OBTAINING LOCAL PROPORTIONS FROM INVERTED SEISMIC DATA TOWARD PATTERN-BASED DOWNSCALING OF SEISMIC DATA Lisa Stright and Alexandre Boucher School of Earth.
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji 25th SCRF Annual Meeting May 9 – 11, 2012
Analyzing reservoir and overburden impacts on seismic and electromagnetic responses and the applicability of seismic/EM methods in deep water reservoir.
Thin sub-resolution shaly-sands
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting
Paolo Dell’Aversana, Gianluca Gabbriellini, Alfonso Amendola Eni SpA
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Guang Yang, Amit Suman, Celine Scheidt, Jef Caers
Cheolkyun Jeong, Céline Scheidt, Jef Caers, and Tapan Mukerji
A strategy for managing uncertainty
Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using direct non-linear inversion method: an application to time-lapse seismic data Haiyan Zhang,
Combining statistical rock physics and sedimentology to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization Per Åge Avseth Norsk Hydro Research Centre.
Addy Satija and Jef Caers Department of Energy Resources Engineering
Peipei Li, Tapan Mukerji
Quantitative Analysis of Older Logs for Porosity and Permeability; West Flank Reservoirs, Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela E.R. (Ross) Crain* (Spectrum 2000.
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting May
Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic
Yongduk Shin and Tapan Mukerji May 8th, 2014
Reservoir Characterization in Leming Lake, Alberta
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
Pejman Tahmasebi, Thomas Hossler and Jef Caers
Modeling sub-seismic depositional lobes using spatial statistics
Assessing uncertainties on production forecasting based on production Profile reconstruction from a few Dynamic simulations Gaétan Bardy – PhD Student.
Seismic attribute applications:
PHD IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING PEDRO PEREIRA Motivation
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Modeling Natural Fracture Networks in the Context of Flow Simulations: Teapot Dome, Wy Thomas H. Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia.
Céline Scheidt, Pejman Tahmasebi and Jef Caers
SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES
A Geologic Model 1m 75 m Perm 250 mD Sand Shale 0.1 mD 50 m Slide 16
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
SCRF High-order stochastic simulations and some effects on flow through heterogeneous media Roussos Dimitrakopoulos COSMO – Stochastic Mine Planning.
10. Inversion for acoustic and elastic impedance
Energy Resources Engineering Department Stanford University, CA, USA
Upscaling Petrophysical Properties to the Seismic Scale
Siyao Xu, Andre Jung Tapan Mukerji and Jef Caers
QUANTITATIVE RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING ROCK PHYSICS, SEISMIC AND GEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS – EXAMPLES FROM SEMLIKI BASIN IN ALBERTINE GRABEN By Nakajigo.
Presentation transcript:

Jaehoon Lee, Tapan Mukerji, Michael Tompkins Statistical Integration of Time-lapse Seismic and Electromagnetic Data for Reservoir Monitoring and Management Jaehoon Lee, Tapan Mukerji, Michael Tompkins

Motivation and Objective Joint integration of multidisciplinary geophysical data can provide complementary information not only in reservoir characterization but also in reservoir monitoring. Statistical Rock Physics Modeling (Avseth et al., 2001; Mukerji et al., 2001) Well logs Rock physics modeling Multivariate PDF To develop a statistical workflow to integrate time-lapse seismic and EM data with proper consideration of scale differences.

Example: 2-D Cross Section Stanford VI-E (Lee & Mukerji, 2012) A 3-layer fluvial channel system. 30 year simulation with 31 producers and 15 injectors . 150×200×200 cells. Dx = Dy = 25m, Dz =1m. Oil Saturation (30 years) Facies

Example: Impedances & Resistivity Acoustic Impedance Elastic Impedance (30°) Electrical Resistivity Born filtering Geometric moving average

Example: Well Logs Well 1 Well 2

Example: Well Log Data Extension Oil sand Shale Oil sand Brine sand Shale Brine sand Oil sand Brine sand Shale

Example: Well-scale Data PDF Well-log Data (Training Data) Field-scale Data (Classifying Attributes)

Example: Classification by Well-scale PDF True Facies Well-scale PDF Bad classification result caused by scale difference

Methodology: Analogous Reservoir Generation Field-scale Data Well-scale Data MP Geostatistics, SNESIM (Strebelle, 2000) Well-scale PDF

Example: Simulated Field-scale PDF Simulated Field-scale Data (Training Data) Field-scale Data (Classifying Attributes)

Example: Classification by Field-scale PDF Well-scale PDF True Facies Improved classification Field-scale PDF

Example: Classification by Field-scale PDF True Facies Only EM Seismic & EM Only seismic

Example: 2-D Cross Section (Time-lapse) Oil Saturation (20 years) Oil Saturation (30 years) Facies (20 years) Facies (30 years)

Methodology: Analogous Reservoir Generation Two different saturation profiles are simulated for each realization. Seismic and EM attributes are related to each other by porosity. Well-scale PDF

Methodology: Hexa-variate Gaussian mixture Hexa-variate Gaussian mixture models are used to incorporate time-lapse seismic and EM data into statistical integration. Acoustic Impedance Elastic Impedance Electrical Resistivity

Example: Classification with Time-lapse Data Gaussian mixture (with DAI, DEI, DR) True Facies Non-parametric (with DAI, DEI, DR) Gaussian mixture (with AIt-1, EIt-1, Rt-1)

Conclusions Developed analogous reservoir generation method to consider the scale differences between well logs, seismic and EM data. Consistent way with seismic and EM forward modeling and inversion. Filtering can be used to reduce computational time. A few realizations are enough. Realizations do not have to be as large as the target reservoir. Applied hexa-variate Gaussian mixture models to incorporate time-lapse data into field-scale joint PDFs with the analogous reservoir generation method.

Future Work The developed workflow will be applied to a three-dimensional synthetic reservoir and a real reservoir. Stanford VI-E layer 3 Norne field