TESTING PHILOSOPHY BREEDER VS. OVT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Advertisements

Peanut Provisions in the Farm Bill Nathan Smith, PhD Extension Economist Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia.
Hypothesis Testing making decisions using sample data.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
INFLUENCE OF PHC PRODUCTS ON POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD PT Summary Across Studies - WA Only PRE-HARVEST APPLICATION EFFECTS ON POST-HARVEST STORAGE.
State of the Region Overview of APR Data for the Western Region Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San Francisco, California.
BASE REVENUE PROTECTION AND REVENUE COUNTERCYCLICAL PROGRAMS Dwight Aakre, Ron Haugen, Andrew Swenson North Dakota State University Extension Service Fargo,
Unit 10: Hypothesis Tests. Effect of sample size Valesky vs. Brown: Both surveys below say 54% for V., so for CI, EV of sample % is.54. And for sig test:
The Scenarios An Analysis of Safety Net Alternatives and The Flex-fallow Program The was Prepared at the Request of Rep. Charles Stenholm The.
Grain Production Trends in Southeastern Michigan Initial Findings from FSEP Grain Survey: 2006 Presenters: Karl Buck and Ann Vail.
Variety Testing Hybrid Testing Dr. Chad Lee Grain Crops Extension Specialist (859) Grain Crops Extension.
Opportunities Canola (spring and winter) could be an important crop to help Michigan diversify its agriculture, complement its cropping systems, and maintain.
Hypothesis testing is used to make decisions concerning the value of a parameter.
ISU Agronomy Extension Fertilizer Price Effect on Optimum Corn N Rate Recommendations John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Recommendations from Elasticity Subgroup Bruce Babcock Angelo Gurgel Mark Stowers.
Making the Most of Spatial Technologies: from an Ag Retailer and Service Provider’s Perspective Clint Jayroe Director of Operations – OptiGro Jimmy Sanders,
SCC-33 National Variety Testing Meeting New Orleans – February 8-10, 2012 Rick Mascagni LSU AgCenter St. Joseph, LA.
Nutrient Management Research Conducted by Market Directions for the Conservation Technology Information Center.
National Economic Survey of Iraq 1 The Agriculture Survey Part 2 November 21, 2004.
Econ 338C, Spring 2009 ECON 338C: Topics in Grain Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
1 Corn 2007 Ouachita Fertilizer Boyce. 2 Ouachita Commitment to you Increase yields Lower costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
Louisiana Variety Testing 2010 SCC-33/UCTA St. Pete Beach, FL January 26-29, 2010 Rick Mascagni Northeast Research Station St. Joseph, LA.
Climate Change Adaptation: Crop Choice. Crop Choice As climate changes, net revenues of plants change – Crops move along their climate response function.
Grain Production Trends in Southeastern Michigan Initial Findings from FSEP Grain Survey: 2006.
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Canadian National Millers Association September 14, 2009 Jim Tobin VP, Grain & Crop Industry Affairs Monsanto Company.
Plant Science Crop ID. Cotton Flower Cotton Leaf.
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Cotton Varieties and Fiber Quality Selecting Cotton Varieties for 2003 Steve Brown and Philip Jost.
Impact of Rotation and Fumigation on 2006 Cotton Production in Reniform Infested Cotton Fields. Gazaway, W.S., K. Lawrence, and J.R. Akridge Auburn University.
Hypothesis Testing and Statistical Significance
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
Conservation Tillage in Cotton: A Mississippi Delta Perspective
Variable Rate Nitrogen
ACRE Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
The Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO)
2014 Farm Bill Commodity Programs PLC
Think Break #20 Suppose you are a corn-soybean farmer who currently custom hires all combining. You are thinking of buying a combine. Do a partial budget.
Economic Impact of Irrigation Along the McClusky Canal
No-Till Wheat and Grain Sorghum Rotations
SOYBEAN YIELDS: A STRATEGIC ISSUE?
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
Soil test results and how to use them
COMBO: Crop Insurance for 2011
The Extension Challenge of Crop Variety Selection in Colorado Plus LSD Alpha Level Revisited Plus Painting a Picture Jerry J. Johnson Professor and Extension.
Figure 1. Long term annual precipitation received at Bird City, Kansas
Concepts and Rationale for Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn
Who benefits from Biotechnology?
Tri-County Events Shannon Braswell.
What Is Up with Soybean Yields?
Precision Agriculture
Market Outlook & Farm Bill
More About Tests Notes from
4R Nutrient Stewardship Climate-Smart Agriculture
Biology: Study of Life (Bio: Living “Logos”: Study of)
Associate Professor/Crop Marketing Specialist
Associate Professor/Crop Markets Specialist
Crop Market Outlook Surviving and Thriving in Challenging Times:
Census of Agriculture 2007 Farms & Farming in Southwest Minnesota
The 2017/18 Crop Market Outlook: The Search for Higher Prices
Grain Price Forecasts and the Implications for Animal Agriculture
The 2014 Farm Bill Iowa Corn Growers and Iowa Institute for Coops
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Agricultural Marketing
What’s in the Farm Bill for Me?
Agriculture media Planning Guide
Multi-Peril Crop Insurance
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Presentation transcript:

TESTING PHILOSOPHY BREEDER VS. OVT

NULL HYPOTHESIS BREEDER- THERE ARE DIFFERENCES OVT – THERE ARE NO DIFFERENCES

ALPHA LEVEL BREEDER – NONE NEEDED OVT – Carmer 1976 Crop Sci. 16:95-99. .20 -.40

CHARACTERISTICS OF TEST SITES BREEDER – HIGH DISCRIMINATION OVT – REPRESENTATIVE OF GROWING REGION

DISCRIMINATION REGRESS ENTRY MEANS BY LOCATION ON ENTRY MEANS ACROSS LOCATIONS, Ref. Brown, Sorrels, Coffman. Higher ‘b’ values indicate better discrimination

REPRESENTATIVE OVTs CONDUCTED UNDER OPTIMUM, AVERAGE, AND BELOW-AVERAGE CONDITIONS TO REPRESENT AVERAGE GROWER’S CONDITIONS… Salmon, 1951

NUMBER OF TRIALS BREEDER HAS LIMITED SEED SO NEEDS A FEW DISCRIMINATING SITES OVT PROGRAM NEEDS TO SAMPLE ENVIRONMENTS

HOW MANY SITES ARE USED BY OVT PROGRAMS ?

Average and median number of sites BARLEY -5 CORN – 13 COTTON – 7 SOYBEAN -10 WHEAT - 9 MEDIAN BARLEY – 4 CORN – 9 COTTON – 6 SOYBEAN – 8 WHEAT - 7

RANGE OF ACRES PER TEST SITE BARLEY – 10,000 TO 30,000 CORN – 31,000 TO 417,000 COTTON – 33,000 TO 294,000 SOYBEAN – 75,000 TO 680,000 WHEAT – 28,000 TO 457,000

HOW MANY TEST SITES ARE ACTUALLY NEEDED?

Vmean =

WHAT IS AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF PRECISION? LSD = 10% OF THE MEAN SEEMS REASONABLE TO ME !

CORN EXAMPLE AVERAGE YIELD OF 140 BU/A LSD = 14 BU/A NEED S.E. OF MEAN DIFFERENCE= 7.0 USING 2 YEARS, 5 REPS THEN LOCATIONS NEEDED WOULD BE 4 AVERAGE NUMBER OF TESTS LOST = 1.5 SO I NEED 6 TESTS TO COVER 750,000 a

POINTS NULL HYPOTHESIS – DIFF. VS. NO DIFF. ALPHA LEVEL – NONE VS. 0.2 SITES – DISCRIMINATORY VS SAMPLE SITE NUMBERS – FEW DISCRIM. VS DESIRED LEVEL OF PRECISION