Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANOVA Two Factor Models Two Factor Models. 2 Factor Experiments Two factors can either independently or together interact to affect the average response.
Advertisements

Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs
Chapter Fourteen The Two-Way Analysis of Variance.
N-way ANOVA. Two-factor ANOVA with equal replications Experimental design: 2  2 (or 2 2 ) factorial with n = 5 replicate Total number of observations:
Statistics for Business and Economics
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition
Experimental Design Terminology  An Experimental Unit is the entity on which measurement or an observation is made. For example, subjects are experimental.
Chi-Square and F Distributions Chapter 11 Understandable Statistics Ninth Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by Yixun Shi Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 11 Multifactor Analysis of Variance.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 10-1 Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Understanding the Two-Way Analysis of Variance
Chapter 14Prepared by Samantha Gaies, M.A.1 Chapter 14: Two-Way ANOVA Let’s begin by reviewing one-way ANOVA. Try this example… Does motivation level affect.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 7 Chapter 15: Factorial Models (15.5) Chapter 17: Random Effects Models.
QNT 531 Advanced Problems in Statistics and Research Methods
© 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 11-1 Analysis of Variance IE 340/440 PROCESS IMPROVEMENT THROUGH PLANNED EXPERIMENTATION Dr. Xueping Li University of Tennessee.
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 4 – Introduction to Factorials
© 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 9-1 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 3 rd Edition Chapter 9 Analysis of Variance.
Chapter 11 HYPOTHESIS TESTING USING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
Analysis of Variance (Two Factors). Two Factor Analysis of Variance Main effect The effect of a single factor when any other factor is ignored. Example.
CHAPTER 12 Analysis of Variance Tests
Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 10-1 Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Inferential Statistics
Design Of Experiments With Several Factors
Lecture 9-1 Analysis of Variance
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)
Single-Factor Studies KNNL – Chapter 16. Single-Factor Models Independent Variable can be qualitative or quantitative If Quantitative, we typically assume.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 9 Chapter 17: Models with Random Effects Chapter 18: Repeated Measures.
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication KNNL – Chapter 19.
Topic 24: Two-Way ANOVA. Outline Two-way ANOVA –Data –Cell means model –Parameter estimates –Factor effects model.
1 Experimental Statistics Spring week 6 Chapter 15: Factorial Models (15.5)
Chapter 4 Analysis of Variance
Chapter 9 More Complicated Experimental Designs. Randomized Block Design (RBD) t > 2 Treatments (groups) to be compared b Blocks of homogeneous units.
1 Mixed and Random Effects Models 1-way ANOVA - Random Effects Model 1-way ANOVA - Random Effects Model 2-way ANOVA - Mixed Effects Model 2-way ANOVA -
1 Experimental Statistics - week 8 Chapter 17: Mixed Models Chapter 18: Repeated Measures.
Analysis of Variance l Chapter 8 l 8.1 One way ANOVA
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
SPSS Homework SPSS Homework 12.1 Practice Data from exercise ) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 3rd Edition
Two-Way Analysis of Variance Chapter 11.
Nested Designs Ex 1--Compare 4 states’ low-level radioactive hospital waste A: State B: Hospital Rep: Daily waste.
Factorial Experiments
An Introduction to Two-Way ANOVA
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
Comparing Three or More Means
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
More Complicated Experimental Designs
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Unbalanced 2-Factor Studies
Unbalanced 2-Factor Studies
More Complicated Experimental Designs
Review Compare one sample to another value One sample t-test
Two Factor ANOVA with 1 Unit per Treatment
Two Factor ANOVA with 1 Unit per Treatment
Example of chai square test (1) false dice
More Complicated Experimental Designs
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections
Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Chapter 14: Two-Factor Analysis of Variance (Independent Measures)
Chapter 12 A Priori and Post Hoc Comparisons Multiple t-tests Linear Contrasts Orthogonal Contrasts Trend Analysis Bonferroni t Fisher Least Significance.
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Experimental Statistics - week 8
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication KNNL – Chapter 19

Two Factor Studies Factor A @ a levels Factor B @ b levels  ab ≡ # treatments with n replicates per treatment Controlled Experiments (CRD) – Randomize abn experimental units to the ab treatments (n units per trt) Observational Studies – Take random samples of n units from each population/sub-population One-Factor-at-a-Time Method – Choose 1 level of one factor (say A), and compare levels of other factor (B). Choose best level factor B levels, hold that constant and compare levels of factor A Not effective – Poor randomization, logistics, no interaction tests Better Method – Observe all combinations of factor levels

ANOVA Model Notation – Additive Model Halo Effect Study: Factor A: Essay Quality(Good,Poor) Factor B: Photo: (Attract,Unatt,None) A=EQ\B=Pic j=1: Attract j=2: Unatt j=3: None Row Average i=1: Good m11 = 25 m12 = 18 m13 = 20 m1● = 21 i=2: Poor m21 = 17 m22 = 10 m23 = 12 m2● = 13 Column Average m●1 = 21 m●2 = 14 m●3 = 16 m●● = 17

ANOVA Model Notation – Interaction Model Halo Effect Study: Factor A: Essay Quality(Good,Poor) Factor B: Photo: (Attract,Unatt,None) A=EQ\B=Pic j=1: Attract j=2: Unatt j=3: None Row Average i=1: Good m11 = 23 m12 = 20 m13 = 20 m1● = 21 i=2: Poor m21 = 19 m22 = 8 m23 = 12 m2● = 13 Column Average m●1 = 21 m●2 = 14 m●3 = 16 m●● = 17

Comments on Interactions Some interactions, while present, can be ignored and analysis of main effects can be conducted. Plots with “almost” parallel means will be present. In some cases, a transformation can be made to remove an interaction. Typically: logarithmic, square root, square or reciprocal transformations may work In many settings, particular interactions may be hypothesized, or observed interactions can have interesting theoretical interpretations When factors have ordinal factor levels, we may observe antagonistic or synergistic interactions

Two Factor ANOVA – Fixed Effects – Cell Means

Two Factor ANOVA – Fixed Effects – Factor Effects

Analysis of Variance – Least Squares/ML Estimators

Analysis of Variance – Sums of Squares

Analysis of Variance – Expected Mean Squares

ANOVA Table – F-Tests Source df SS MS F* Factor A a-1 SSA MSA=SSA/(a-1) FA*=MSA/MSE Factor B b-1 SSB MSB=SSB/(b-1) FB*=MSB/MSE AB Interaction (a-1)(b-1) SSAB MSAB=SSAB/[(a-1)(b-1)] FAB*=MSAB/MSE Error ab(n-1) SSE MSE=SSE/[ab(n-1)] Total abn-1 SSTO

Testing/Modeling Strategy Test for Interactions – Determine whether they are significant or important – If they are: If the primary interest is the interactions (as is often the case in behavioral research), describe the interaction in terms of cell means If goal is for simplicity of model, attempt simple transformations on data (log, square, square root, reciprocal) If they are not significant or important: Test for significant Main Effects for Factors A and B Make post-hoc comparisons among levels of Factors A and B, noting that the marginal means of levels of A are based on bn cases and marginal means of levels of B are based on an cases

Factor Effect Contrasts when No Interaction

Factor Effect Contrasts when Interaction Present