TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 5. Adapting And Implementing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 1)
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 3. Designing and Integrating Design-Implement Experiences November 2007.
TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 2. Designing An Integrated Curriculum
THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: Introduction November 2007.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
COUNSELOR EDUCATION PEDAGOGY TRAINING Session One: Significant Learning and Counselor Education.
Instructional Leadership: Building Consensus Name Workshop Facilitator.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Good teaching for diverse learners
Welcome the participants and jump right in to the session.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Embedding generic skills in the curriculum
New Hanover County Schools
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Welcome! Enhancing the Care Team May 25, 2017
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Leveraging the Work of Mathematics Leaders
Building Momentum: getting teachers excited about C3
Quarterly Meeting Focus
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Chartered College of Teaching
Mastery-Based Learning:
NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Martha Rankin
How does it differ from community service?
Designing for Engagement
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
MNPS Institute Working with Partners July 13-14, 2017
The School Counseling Program at {Your School Name}
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Curriculum.
Competency Based Learning and Development
Identify Key Factors that Impact Effective Change Efforts
rigor November minutes
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
Early Childhood Higher Education Program Enhancement Institute
Peer Review & Enhancement Promoting enhancement through reflective critical friendship Quick guide Version 2, LEAD, October 2017.
Introductory Workshop THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION
From the Ground Up: Getting Everyone Thinking About Assessment
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Training Officers Consortium
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
Engaging Institutional Leadership
Overview of the Intent of the Iowa Core Curriculum
SVP Connecticut Values Retreat Session – November 7th
Q uality uestioning Henrico County Public Schools
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Cooperative Learning Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Applying for promotion on learning and teaching 1 Gathering Evidence
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Presentation transcript:

TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 5. Adapting And Implementing THE CDIO APPROACH TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 5. Adapting And Implementing The CDIO Approach November 2007 Refer to “Rethinking Engineering Education”, Chapter 8. Be sure to introduce yourself, and give participants your email address.

PLAN FOR TODAY’S WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION CDIO AS THE CONTEXT THE CDIO SYLLABUS WHY WHAT PRO-GRAM EVALU-ATION INTEGRATED CURRICULUM LEARNING DESIGN-IMPLEMENT EXPERIENCES HOW ASSESSMENT Highlight the word “Implementation” -- the focus of this session. It is not , in itself a CDIO Standard, though “model” CDIO programs will have a defined implementation plan in place. WORKSPACES INTRO TO ENGINEERING HOW WELL FACULTY COMPETENCE IMPLEMENTATION

SESSION FIVE OBJECTIVES Recognize key factors that influence change in an organization Examine the implementation process in a selected CDIO program Describe resources that facilitate the adoption of CDIO in engineering programs

KEY FACTORS THAT PROMOTE CULTURAL CHANGE GETTING OFF TO THE RIGHT START 1 Understanding the need for change 2 Leadership from the top 3 Creating a vision 4 Support of early adopters 5 Early successes (see examples) BUILDING MOMENTUM IN THE CORE ACTIVITIES OF CHANGE 6 Moving off assumptions 7 Including students as agents of change 8 Involvement and ownership 9 Adequate resources INSTITUTIONALIZING CHANGE 10 Faculty recognition and incentives 11 Faculty learning culture (see examples) 12 Student expectations and academic requirements The 12 key factors are described in the Handbook. Resist the temptation to talk about all of them here. In the next three slides, you will give examples of #5 Early Successes #11 Faculty Learning Culture Participants will then find examples of the remaining 10 factors in the exercise that follows.

EXAMPLES: #5 EARLY SUCCESSES Identify learning outcomes for several courses. Start, or modify, a first-year engineering course that includes a simple design-implement experience. Modify an upper-level course to include a simple, low-cost design-implement experience. Modify an appropriate meeting room or flexible classroom space to create a design-implement workspace that supports hands-on and social learning. Point out that additional examples can be found at http://www.cdio.org.

EXAMPLES: #11 FACULTY LEARNING CULTURE Enhancement of CDIO Skills Hire faculty with industrial experience Give new hires a year to gain experience before beginning program responsibilities Create educational programs for current faculty Provide faculty with leave to work in industry Encourage outside professional activities that give faculty appropriate experiences Recruit senior faculty with significant professional engineering experience Mention that faculty enhancement of CDIO skills is the focus of CDIO Standard Nine. In the year before beginning teaching responsibilities, new hires might gain experience by Working in industry Co-teaching a course with a more experienced instructor Visiting other CDIO programs Designing a project-based course

EXAMPLES: #11 FACULTY LEARNING CULTURE Enhancement of Teaching Skills Hire faculty with interest in education and ask them to discuss teaching during their interviews Encourage faculty to take part in CDIO workshops Connect with the teaching and learning centers at your universities Invite guest speakers on teaching topics Organize coaching by educational professionals or distinguished peers Participate in teaching mentorship programs Mention that the enhancement of faculty teaching skills is the focus of CDIO Standard Ten.

Discuss what the factor means ACTIVITY: DISCUSSION Working with the key change factor assigned to your group, and the descriptions found in the Handbook: Discuss what the factor means List 3 or 4 examples of ways that you can apply that change factor in your engineering program Share an example with the whole group Assign key factors #1 through #12 to the partners, skipping #5 and #11. Ask them to read their assigned key factor in “Key Success Factors That Promote Cultural Change”, found in the Handbook.

DEVELOPMENT OF A CDIO APPROACH Refer to “Rethinking Engineering Education”, pp. 187-188. Point out the steps that have been discussed in today’s workshop. Note the C-D-I-O phases of development.

AN IMPLEMENTATION STORY The Change Process At École Polytechnique de Montréal This implementation story can be changed to accommodate the person who is facilitating the workshop, and to give a relevant example to the audience. Othe examples include: The U. S. Naval Academy, Daryl Boden, boden@usna.edu KTH-The Royal Institute of Technology, Kristina Edström, kristina@kth.se Queen’s University Belfast, Perry Armstrong, pjarmstrong@qub.ac.uk

NEED FOR CHANGE To adapt the program in order for students to achieve the new outcomes To address the drop in enrollment and low retention (output) despite high-quality students (input) To create better connections between mathematics, science, and engineering as required by the new common first-year program To help students, who are good technically, to integrate what they learn, and develop personal and interpersonal skills

Evolution To modernize the programs, WHY REVISE OUR PROGRAMS? taking into account the needs of society. while focusing on students’ strengths Evolution

EDUCATIONAL PROJECT OBJECTIVES Increase general satisfaction and student success Increase student retention in the program Make academic programs more attractive Change perceptions of the common first year Answer today’s needs of organizations

VISION Educate mechanical engineering professionals competent in the development of complex products and systems who will be leaders in their domains Align project with the CDIO approach to structure, support and accelerate the implementation

CURRICULUM GOALS The development of the new curriculum is articulated around four principles. To educate graduates With a strong knowledge of fundamental sciences With a solid experience in design Who master personal and interpersonal skills Ready for multidisciplinary international projects

INTEGRATION OF SUBJECTS Projects, Design and Engineering Practice

DESIGN-IMPLEMENT PROJECTS Built on past experience Collaboration with industry C-D-I-O

CDIO-BASED INITIATIVES Stakeholder survey completed in 2006-2007 Personal and interpersonal skills: communication, teamwork, critical thinking, listening, leadership C-D-I-O projects and workspaces Teaching Technology CDIO Chair Design Chair Initiative: Engineering-Industrial Design-Business schools collaboration

ADVICE FOR ADOPTERS Evaluate your program. What are your strengths and weaknesses with respect to the CDIO Syllabus? Identify some early successes Easy to implement Quick payoff Visible results Generate buy-in from faculty Give them tools to help with changes Reward faculty who embrace CDIO Give faculty ownership in the project Be ready to assess changes Identify resources needed before you embark on large changes – especially project-based courses

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT CDIO … Visit www.cdio.org! Ask how many people have already found and used the CDIO website. What parts have been most useful? Was there something you could not find?

OPEN-SOURCE RESOURCES Available at http://www.cdio.org The CDIO Syllabus The CDIO Standards Start-Up Guidance Implementation Kit (I-Kit) Instructional Resource Materials (IRMs) Other Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach by Crawley, Malmqvist, Östlund, & Brodeur, 2007 Annual international CDIO conference Local, regional, and international workshops Ask how many have seen the book. What parts have been most useful? Mention the upcoming conferences. Encourage participants to attend and/or give presentations.

CHALLENGES ACTIVITY: DISCUSSION Identify 3 key challenges that you face in implementing a CDIO approach in your program. What resources can you draw on to address these challenges? This may be a whole-group discussion. At this point in the workshop, participants should feel comfortable contributing to a large-group discussion. Point out the “Frequently Asked Questions and Answers”, found in the Handbook. Parking Lot: Address questions still remaining in the Parking Lot. Alternately, ask questioners to write their email addresses on their questions, if they would like follow-up answers. (Later, you can decide with your co-facilitators who will follow up on specific questions.)

Please write additional comments on the back of this page. SUMMARY: How much progress did you make toward the workshop objectives? Little or no progress Some progress Very good progress Explain the CDIO approach to engineering education Determine ways in which the CDIO approach may be adapted to your own programs Share your ideas and experiences of engineering education reform Other (please specify) There is a copy of this form at the end of the Handbook. Ask participants to complete the form and leave it with you today. Recall that this format for checking for understanding or collecting data was used earlier in the workshop. (rating the challenges to integrating design-implement experiences) Thank the group for their participation. Please write additional comments on the back of this page.