Developing a Team Environment Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Advertisements

Twelve Cs for Team Building
Assessing Students in Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education Center/
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Teamwork and Project Management
Teamwork and Project Management Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota December 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute.
What is Teamwork & Team Building Team work : Concept of people working together as a team. Team Player : A team player is someone who is able to get.
Teams As Used In CVEN 349 Module Revised: January 16, 2003 Original Developed by Jim Morgan for ENGR 111/112.
Project Management Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota MOT 8221 Spring, 2002.
Computer Engineering 203 R Smith Management Skills 02/ What are Engineering Management Skills? Engineering Management requires a combination of both.
Teamwork and Leadership
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Assessing Students in Team-Based Learning
TOGETHER EVERYONE ACHIEVES MORE
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing and Supporting.
Teamwork and Project Management Karl A. Smith Purdue University/ University of Minnesota Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society.
Teamwork 101.
Developing Team Norms. Today’s Class Listen to a presentation on developing team norms (5 min) Work in teams to identify characteristics of effective.
1 Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Elder Care.
10 Aug 2010 ECE/BENG-492 SENIOR ADVANCED DESIGN PROJECT Meeting #2.
Team Charter Examples & Research
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Tower Design Exercise.
TEAMWORK AND TEAM BUILDING KEYS TO GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY.
Cooperative Teams. Essential Elements of Cooperative Teams-1 Positive interdependence Promotive interaction Individual accountability Learning and practicing.
Building Blocks of Effective Teamwork
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota -
Why Teams?. Teams Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Often necessary to lead deep and lasting.
Teambuilding For Supervisors. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives You will be able to: Recognize the value of team efforts Identify.
Cooperative Learning and Problem- Based Learning: Working with Teams Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
Building and Managing Successful Teams for Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
1 Project-Based Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Developing a Team Environment Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota January 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota.
Teams & Teamwork “A small group of people with complementary skills, who are committed to a common performance, goals, and approach for which they hold.
1 Interprofessional Health Care Team Meetings OBJECTIVES: Identify key principles and characteristics of effective interprofessional team meetings Identify.
Prepared By :ANJALI. What is a Team? Two or more persons work together to achieve same goal or complete a task. Teams make decisions, solve problems,
Team Building and Assessment
High Performance Teamwork
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
High-Performance Teamwork
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
An Introduction to Teamwork
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
High Performance Teamwork
Effective Designs and Practices for Formal Cooperative Learning
High Performance Teamwork
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Project-Based Cooperative Learning
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
Barbara McKenzie 2016 – 2017 Membership Coordinator
Innovation in a Team Environment High-Performance Teamwork
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Project-Based Cooperative Learning
Changing Families All families are different, just as each person in a family is different. We need to learn to celebrate our differences and be assured.
Tips for Leading Effective Meetings
Tips for Leading Effective Meetings
CSC 492 – Senior Design – Spring 2019
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Changing Families All families are different, just as each person in a family is different. We need to learn to celebrate our differences and be assured.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Teaming Class 2 Notes – Sections 2 & 3
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Effective Designs and Practices for Formal Cooperative Learning
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
High-Performance Teamwork
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Project Management Managing Project Teams Teamwork and Leadership
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Team Environment Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota ksmith@umn.edu www.ce.umn.edu/~smith December 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society for Professional Engineers

Teambuilding and Project Management Perspectives Capitalizing on individual differences Leading a team to consensus; the importance of buy-in Expanding a team’s capabilities Perspectives on the role of project manager Key components to project and/or team success Project coordination 2

Design team failure is usually due to failed team dynamics (Leifer, Koseff & Lenshow, 1995). It’s the soft stuff that’s hard, the hard stuff is easy (Doug Wilde, quoted in Leifer, 1997)

Top Three Main Engineering Work Activities (Burton, Parker & LeBold, 1998) Engineering Total Design – 36% Computer applications – 31% Management – 29% Civil/Architectural Management – 45% Design – 39% Computer applications – 20% Burton, L., Parker, L, & LeBold, W. 1998. U.S. engineering career trends. ASEE Prism, 7(9), 18-21. 4

Teamwork 5

Characteristics of Effective Groups Common goal Communication Respect for one another on the team Willing to help Desire to succeed/commitment to succeed Chain on command Clear leadership/facilitation Adequate resources especially adequate budget Clear objective Clear, defined timeline Specific or assigned tasks delegated Innovative, creative Consistent accountability Ownership – sense of responsibility Belief in your objective Element of feedback Team members roles well defined 6

--Katzenbach & Smith (1993) A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable • SMALL NUMBER • COMPLEMENTARY SKILLS • COMMON PURPOSE & PERFORMANCE GOALS • COMMON APPROACH • MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY --Katzenbach & Smith (1993) The Wisdom of Teams

Six Basic Principles of Team Discipline Keep team membership small Ensure that members have complimentary skills Develop a common purpose Set common goals Establish a commonly agreed upon working approach Integrate mutual and individual accountability Katzenbach & Smith (2001) The Discipline of Teams 8

Group Task and Maintenance Roles Group Task Roles Group Maintenance Roles Initiating Encouraging Seeking Information Expressing Feelings Giving Information Harmonizing Seeking Opinions Compromising Giving Opinions Facilitating Communications Clarifying Setting Standards or Goals Elaborating Testing Agreement Summarizing Following

Group Processing Plus/Delta Format Delta Plus Things That Group Did Well Delta Things Group Could Improve

Team Charter Team name, membership, and roles Team Mission Statement Anticipated results (goals) Specific tactical objectives Ground rules/Guiding principles for team participation Shared expectations/aspirations

•EVERY member is responsible for the team’s progress and success. Code of Cooperation •EVERY member is responsible for the team’s progress and success. •Attend all team meetings and be on time. •Come prepared. •Carry out assignments on schedule. •Listen to and show respect for the contributions of other members; be an active listener. •CONSTRUCTIVELY criticize ideas, not persons. •Resolve conflicts constructively, •Pay attention, avoid disruptive behavior. •Avoid disruptive side conversations. •Only one person speaks at a time. •Everyone participates, no one dominates. •Be succinct, avoid long anecdotes and examples. •No rank in the room. •Respect those not present. •Ask questions when you do not understand. •Attend to your personal comfort needs at any time but minimize team disruption. •HAVE FUN!! •? Adapted from Boeing Aircraft Group Team Member Training Manual

Ten Commandments: An Affective Code of Cooperation • Help each other be right, not wrong. • Look for ways to make new ideas work, not for reasons they won't. • If in doubt, check it out! Don't make negative assumptions about each other. • Help each other win, and take pride in each other's victories. • Speak positively about each other and about your organization at every opportunity. • Maintain a positive mental attitude no matter what the circumstances. • Act with initiative and courage, as if it all depends on you. • Do everything with enthusiasm; it's contagious. • Whatever you want; give it away. • Don't lose faith. • Have fun Ford Motor Company 13

Engineering Design – Team Exercise The engineering method is design under constraints Wm. Wulf, President, National Academy of Engineering Design in a major sense is the essence of engineering; it begins with the identification of a need and ends with a product or system in the hands of a user. It is primarily concerned with synthesis rather than the analysis which is central to engineering science. Design, above all else, distinguishes engineering from science (Hancock, 1986, National Science Foundation Workshop). A scientist discovers that which exists. An engineer creates that which never was. (Theodore von Karman, 1881-1963). 14

Team Member Roles Task Recorder Process Recorder Materials Manager 15

Design objective Design and build a tower which can support a standard book as high in the air as possible (at least 25 cm). The tower is built from index cards and office tape. Design rules Materials are 100 index cards and one roll of office tape Cards can be folded but not torn No piece of tape can be longer than 2 inches Tower cannot be taped to the floor Tower must be in one piece, and easily transported in one hand Time to design and build: 20 minutes Height is measured from the ground to the lowest corner of the book placed on top Tower must support book for at least 10 seconds before the measurement is made Room must be cleaned up before measurements are made.

Group Processing Plus/Delta Format Delta (∆) Plus (+) Things That Group Did Well Delta (∆) Things Group Could Improve

Teamwork & Project Management Heuristics--Examples Identify the weak link and Allocate resources to the weak link Freeze the design--at some stage in the project (when about 75% of the time or resources are used up) the design must be frozen Discuss the process and ask meta-level questions, e.g., What are we doing? Why are we doing it? How does it help? 18

Project Life Cycle? Wild enthusiasm Disillusionment Total confusion Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent Praise and honors for the non-participants 19

• Conceiving and defining the project • Planning the project The prevailing view of the project life cycle is that projects go through distinct phases, such as: • Conceiving and defining the project • Planning the project • Implementing the plan • Completing and evaluating the project • Operate and maintain project A typical construction project has the following seven phases (Kerzner, 1998): 1. Planning, data gathering, and procedures 2. Studies and basic engineering 3. Major review 4. Detail engineering 5. Detail engineering/construction overlap 6. Construction 7. Testing and commissioning Central Concept - Innovation Dominant Project Characteristics - Overlapping, Fewer boundaries Main Thrust - Modifying and Adapting Demands Metaphor - Designing Means - Creativity, Higher Technology Ability

21

22

The Project 50 – Tom Peters Traditional Create – 10% Sell – 0% Implement – 90% Exit – 0% The Project 50 Create – 30% Sell – 30% Implement – 30% Exit – 10% 23

Project Manager’s Role Over the Project Life Cycle: • Planning • Organizing • Staffing • Directing • Controlling See Smith (2004) p. 67-68 Central Concept - Innovation Dominant Project Characteristics - Overlapping, Fewer boundaries Main Thrust - Modifying and Adapting Demands Metaphor - Designing Means - Creativity, Higher Technology Ability

Engineering Method The engineering method is design under constraints – Wm. Wulf The engineering method is the use of heuristics to cause the best change in a poorly understood situation within the available resources – Billy Koen 25

Reflect on the session: Session Summary (Minute Paper) Reflect on the session: 1. Most interesting, valuable, useful thing you learned. 2. Question/Topic/Issue you would like to have addressed. 3. Comments, suggestions, etc Pace: Too slow 1 . . . . 5 Too fast Relevance: Little 1 . . . 5 Lots Instructional Format: Ugh 1 . . . 5 Ah 26