Submitted by the Expert of Sweden

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Fire suppression systems in the engine and heater compartments Proposal for amendment to UN Regulation No. 107 Informal document GRSG (105th GRSG,

Advertisements

OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)

ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF

1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF

3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.

Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF

Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF

1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF

Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF

Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)

In September of 2012 the RA Government made amendments in the Resolution No 168 on ‘Regulation of Procurement Procedures". 1. It is the responsibility.

5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.

Emergency Stopping Signal 80th GRRF session Submitted by the experts from IMMA Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, Agenda item.

CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.

ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF

Proposal Netherlands Tyre Noise Limits Original GRB Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3.

1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.

Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)

Informal Document: ACSF-06-16

Discussion paper – Major Issues

7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016

Presentation of ACSF C tests

Informal Working Group on ACSF

Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-06-25

Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12

Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 39 (Speedometer)

Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

Lane change driver reaction times

HARD SHOULDER SOFT SHOULDER CARRIAGE WAY Slow Lane Center Lane Express Lane.

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

The specified maximum speed of ACSF system

Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization

Informal document GRRF-86-36

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy

ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris

PN Levels in UN Regulation N°83.07

Submitted by the experts of OICA

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

52nd GRSP, 11 – 14 Decemer 2012, agenda item 14

ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

Signalling of information and warnings

Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan

ACSF B1+C functional description

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin

Informal Document: ACSF-10-08

Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1

Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver

Maximum allowable Override Force

ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances

ACSF B1+C functional description

Emergency Steering Function

Interpretation of CSF warnings #2

ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation

Request of clarification on

ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3

Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre

Complete Vehicle Systems.

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI

Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases

Automated Lane Keeping Systems

Presentation transcript:

Submitted by the Expert of Sweden Informal Document - ACSF-15-14 Amend 5.6.4.1.1. to read: A vehicle equipped with an ACSF of Category [C1] shall also be equipped with an ACSF of Category B1 complying with the requirements of this Regulation and in addition aiming to be in the center of the lane. Justification: This will increase the possibility that the lateral movement before the Lane change maneuver starts near the center of the lane and indicate the intention to change lane in a way that is detectable for the driver.