2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration Date: Authors:
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
TGax SLS MAC Calibration Test 4 Results
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
MAC Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
OFDMA Performance Analysis
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
OFDMA Performance Analysis
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Power Save Simulation Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
OBSS Preamble Detection
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2
Simulation Results for Box5
UL MU Random Access Analysis
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box 5 Calibration Result
OFDMA Performance Analysis
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Coex Simulation and Analysis
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Performance evaluation of deterministic service for EHT
Presentation transcript:

2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134 Month Year doc: IEEE 802.11-13/xxxxr0 11ax PAR Verification Date: 2016-09-12 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Email Wilson Tsao MediaTek Inc. 2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134 Wilson.Tsao@mediatek.com Paul Cheng Paul.Cheng@mediatek.com Russell Huang Russell.Huang@mediatek.com Tianyu Wu Tianyu.Wu@mediatek.com James Yee James.Yee@mediatek.com Yonggang Fang, ZTETX

Outline Introduction Simulation results with OBSS Next Step 36BSS with 5STA of each BSS Simulation set up Simulation result analysis Next Step

Introduction Show the performance comparison between OFDMA and legacy (11ac) devices in OBSS dense environment By sharing our simulation results, we encourage more companies to join the PAR verification effort.

Multiple BSS Simulation Set Up Topology Based on residential scenario in the 11ax simulation scenarios document [1]. There are 5 floors. Each floor has 2 rows and 10 columns of apartments. Each apartment is 10x10x3m. Only 1/3 of apartments will be using the same channel. 36 BSS with 5 STA in each BSS. There are total 180 STA. AP is at the center of the BSS. STA is randomly placed in the BSS. PHY abstraction and SINR calculation Follow 11ax evaluation methodology [2]. MAC protocol, such as CCA, backoff, trigger frame, and etc. Based on 11ax draft D0.3 [3].

Multiple BSS Simulation Set Up (cont.) Parameters Value Traffic type Full buffer UDP UL/DL traffic UDP packet size 100 Bytes MCS 5 AP/STA # of tx/rx antenna 1 Access Protocol parameters EDCA with default parameters Bandwidth 80 MHz Aggregation 64 MPDU per AMPDU RTS/CTS No OFDMA allocation Five 242-tone RUs and one 26-tone RU OBSS PD -75 dBm

Topology (1/3)

Topology (2/3)

Topology (3/3)

Simulation Result

Result Analysis DL Better PER provides gains for 11ax MU. With OBSS PD, the extra tx opportunities give more performance gain. UL UL OFDMA gets better PER but total throughput is lower. Need OBSS PD to provide more trigger frame transmission opportunities to have performance gain compared to 11ac. With better tone efficiency, smaller packet size (100Byte) and some spatial reuse (OBSS PD), 11ax OFDMA is getting about 1.6 (DL) and 1.3 (UL) performance gain over 11ac in a residential scenario.

Next Step Try more STA in each BSS. Hope to see more gain with more dense scenario.

References [1] 11-14-0980-16-00ax-simulation-scenarios.docx [2] 11-14-0571-12-00ax-evaluation-methodology.docx [3] Draft P802.11ax_D0.3.pdf