Interoperability as a cornerstone for EIONET

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEIS does matter! sa ɪ z d ə z mæt ə !sa ɪ z d ə z mæt ə ! Towards a Shared Environmental Information System.
Advertisements

Reportnet Reportnet is a system of integrated IT tools and business processes creating a shared information infrastructure optimised to support European.
INSPIRE and MSFD Examples of using spatial data within MSFD context Darja Lihteneger, European Environment Agency,
April 2009 Main issues for WISE infrastructure Stefan Jensen.
WISE GIS Workshop 2012 SensorWeb and WISE as a distributed system Jon Maidens, Atkins 8 May 2012.
Future trends on geospatial distributed infrastructures How EEA leverage upcoming technologies and brings its daily needs into cost effective but interoperable.
EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER Beograd, | Slide 1 Membership of Serbia and Montenegro to the European Environment.
Air quality e-Reporting basics Concepts, data model & resources to support users Tony Bush ETC/ACM AQ e-Reporting task leader 18th EIONET Workshop - Dublin,
7-8 November 2006 Belgrade, Serbia Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water 1 The EIONET-Water.
1 Joint Drafting Group on State of the Environment and Eionet Workshop — Overview task 4 and 5 — 13/14 November 2006 EEA Copenhagen.
Country Visit LT Towards a Shared Environmental Information System SEIS Bernt Röndell.
Country Visit Norway Towards a Shared Environmental Information System SEIS – A European perspective Chris Steenmans.
Stefan Feigenspan Umweltbundesamt - Unit II 4.2 – Air Quality Assessment German air quality database – country experience on e- reporting.
Towards a Shared Environmental Information System for Europe SEIS Chris Steenmans Head of Group Data Access and Management.
SEIS and EEA SDI Stefan Jensen - head of group SEIS and data centre services GeoForum
Artur Gsella European Environment Agency Transition to e-Reporting and the new process flows at the EEA 18th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment.
1 Information Infrastructure for European Environmental Reporting The contribution through Reportnet Stefan Jensen EEA, Copenhagen, Denmark Openforum Santa.
Implementing air quality e-Reporting Data deliverables in 2013 and 2014 and the process of reporting Tony Bush ETC/ACM AQ e-Reporting task leader 18th.
Shared Environmental Information System Bernt Röndell – SEIS Coordinator at EEA.
Armin Müller Ministerium für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft Ernährung, Weinbau und Forsten Rheinland-Pfalz WISE Water Information System.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Workshop on the INSPIRE registry and registers Søren Roug European Environment.
Shared Environmental Information System for Europe for Europe SEIS 25 October 2007, Dublin.
WISE Working Group D September 2009, Brussels Jon Maidens.
Technical group meeting UNEP-WCMC/EEA/ETC-BD 29 August 2011 Practicalities Wireless Coffee Lunch.
European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET NRC Meeting on Biodiversity October 2011, Copenhagen Progress.
SOER 2010 and SENSE Milan Chrenko European Environment Agency.
Participation of KEPA in the work of the EEA Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning Kosovo Environmental Protection Agency Kosovo Environmental.
1 New reporting tools for WISE Stefan Jensen WFD Art.8 – WISE GIS workshop
Reportnet – progress and next steps Søren Roug European Environment Agency.
EEA - recent developments and national comparisons David Lee Environment Statistics and Indicators.
SOER 2010 country assessments and SENSE Lessons learned and the way forward – The European perspective Bernt Röndell (SES), SEIS coordinator at EEA.
1 The EEA/EIONET Information System current applications and further developments relevant for EECCA countries Stefan Jensen.
Artur Gsella European Environment Agency Transition to e-Reporting and the new process flows at the EEA 18th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment.
Gordon McInnes, Deputy Director
EU Data Sources EEA & EuroStat Data.
ROBERT LOWSON EEA COORDINATOR GMES BUREAU.
Part 1: Practical steps for NiD integration into WISE
EEA/EIONET – Support to the Fitness Check Actions and Action Plan
WISE and the future of WFD reporting
Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Concept and state-of-play
The development of WISE and the status of WfD Art.8 submission
Natura 2000 dataflow & Standard data forms
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
Status on eu actions from the kick-off meeting
Centralised EU Registry for industrial entities
- lessons learned - SOE and WFD reporting - GIS/IT developments
Eionet NRC Information Systems Workshop
Towards WISE as a distributed system
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - preliminary lessons learnt
Natura 2000 dataflow (1) QA/QCs for Natura 2000 dataflow is now up and running (completeness & consistency of the tabular data) Individual QA/QCs now uploaded.
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission
E-PTRTR data flow in a Shared Environmental Information System
WISE - State of the art --- WISE - in the context of SEIS
Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS
Water Information System for Europe
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - lessons from implementation so far
Reportnet An Introduction
SCG Meeting Brussels, 18 February 2005
Water Information System for Europe
SCG Meeting Brussels, 18 February 2005
Submitting national data through Reportnet
Water Information System for Europe
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
Reportnet for absolute beginners
Large Combustion Plants dataflow management
CDDA alignment with INSPIRE
Challenges with distributed systems like WISE
Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting
WISEds & Proposed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Interoperability as a cornerstone for EIONET Jan Bliki 27 November 2008

The strategic perspective for SEIS towards 2020 The current data flows Live Information Systems Member states Organisations Member states Organisations One-way flow of information Humans to system Different formats (colors) Package data deliveries Omnipresent flow of information System to system One standard Live data deliveries OGC ?

INSPIRE in GI standards

European Environment Agency as Technical Committee Member For OGC Since July 2007

Web-service Providers Application Providers Data Providers WMS/WFS SWE/WFS-T/WCS Application Demandeur Data Demandeur End User End User

National Datasets to one unified European Dataset + + + National level + + + European level

National Datasets to one unified European Dataset + + + National level + + + European level Hourly data Daily data Monthly data

Improvement of EEA’s data/information flows (500 dataflows in ReportNet) 60% Questionairs 30% Standalone systems 10% Online systems

Data flow structure National system Object Based EU system Table 2 Table 1 Table 5 Table 4 Table 3 Object Based EU system Dataset Based

Type A Type B Type C Type D Data flow frequency High frequency Object Based Dataset Based ReportNet (500 Dataflows)

Data flow structure National system Object Based EU system Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 EU system Dataset Based

Type A Type B Type C Type D Data flow frequency High frequency OzoneWeb (2 Dataflows) Type A Type B Type C Type D Object Based High Frequency = Once a week, day, hour Low Frequency = Once a Month, Year, 2 Years Datasets we talk about in Type A is probably not more then 10% today. Type D = Questionair, small, one report per country, … , Slow changing databases such as Natura 2000?!? Slow changes makes this flow very costly. (Monitoring/infrastructure != possible) Spatial reference data not changing offten. (Lakes, Rivers, Land change) most probably is cheaper in a Type D rather then Type A Type A would be perfect for Monitoring stations, National system filled all year arround, Flood monitoring, Air stations, etc..., Interpolation results from other services feeding other services. Dataset Based ReportNet (500 Dataflows)

Similarities in data flows Fully automated flow !! Change Send Receive Aggregate INTEROPERABILITY = Using standards Measurement Values Co2 NoX Count Spatial Component Parameters Time of change Nuts code Grouping Country Rules Filtering Validation Aggregation Merge Goal should be that ”the less we need to think about the technical implementations, the easier agreements and re-use of data will be possible”

”the less we need to re-invent how data flows; the easier data flows”