Opposition 6. Apples Opponent: Anastasiya Pantsialei Team of Belarus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unagi: The Gathering Team Introduction & Sketch of Strategy T. Akiba, Y. Iwata, K. Imajo, T. Kataoka, M. Kusumoto and K. Hosaka National Center.
Advertisements

Experiments and Variables
CIWMB Electronic Waste Recycling Program R.W. Beck, Inc. Humboldt State University Net Cost Report Training.
Numbers
Experiment 2 - overview. Experiment 2 part 1 - Summary – Raise hypothesis: What factors determine how high a ball bounces? (color, # of bounces, height,
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 4 – Multiple Regression.
Ch 6: Attitudes Part 3: Oct. 10, The Audience Are there strong individual differences in persuadability? – Self-monitoring effects: – Forewarning.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 11, 2003 Chapter 2 (Stanovich) – Cont. from Wed. Chapter 3 (Ray) – Developing the Hypothesis.
Simple Linear Regression NFL Point Spreads – 2007.
Chemical Compounds. Content Standards SC1. Students will analyze the nature of matter and its classifications. c.Predict formulas for stable ionic compounds.
California Victim Compensation Program Using Effective Performance Standards and Scorecards Julie Nauman, Executive Officer California Victim Compensation.
ICELW, New York, June PROJECT USABILITY : SCHMOOSABILITY …what does it matter?
Oral Presentations WISER. Overview Video clip Your topic Structuring your talk Visual aids You & your body!
UNPACKING THE TEACHING BEC STEM CONNECT How to be successful with kids!
Problem No. 8 Team China Taking the stage: ZENG Xiangjian.
Science as a Way of Knowing Mr. H. Clark Bethpage H.S.
Debate Pointers A debate Exhibition. Case case: set of arguments supported by evidences anatomy of a case: definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate.
Who are the strongest people alive?? Maybe… WRONG!!
Simple Machines Lab Practicum Mrs. Green 7 th Science.
The system PROBLEM 1 FEIO Poor loading Insufficient number of facilities Small number of parameters Unaccountable methodology for taxes calculation Poor.
Understanding Science 3. The Scientific Method © Colin Frayn,
Scientific Problem Solving Chapter 1 Nature of Science SC.N1.1, SC.N.1.2 Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Define a problem from the 8 th grade curriculum.
10-1 人生与责任 淮安工业园区实验学校 连芳芳 “ 自我介绍 ” “ 自我介绍 ” 儿童时期的我.
PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 9: Comparisons over time & between countries.
Quantitative Literacy at WOU. LEAP In November, Faculty Senate recommended that WOU adopt LEAP's (Liberal Education & America's Promise) learning outcomes.
REVIEWER PROBLEM NO.X X NFLS.
“Have you ever been a part of a true team?”
مباحث ویژه مدیریت دولتی
Team 1: 32 responses Team 2: 55 responses Team 3: 29 responses
Yahoo Mail Customer Support Number
Most Effective Techniques to Park your Manual Transmission Car
How do Power Car Windows Ensure Occupants Safety
The Scientific method What’s the difference between a theory & a law?
مراقبت خانواده محور در NICU
Adaboost Team G Youngmin Jun
استخراج فلزات 1 آماده‌سازی بار. استخراج فلزات 1 آماده‌سازی بار.
Reporter: Laplace Witches Opponent: New zealand reveiw: Switzerland
دانشگاه شهیدرجایی تهران
Links Keywords Chemical Reactions C3.3 Types of Chemical Reactions 
Debate Format 28 August 2017.
تعهدات مشتری در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی
Maria Krasnova Team from Belarus
Problem №5 Tempest In Water
THANK YOU!.
بسمه تعالی کارگاه ارزشیابی پیشرفت تحصیلی
دومین کمیته مترجمین حاکمیت بالینی دانشگاه
Opponent: Mate Sharvadze Team :Georgians
Exchange bias and magnetocaloric effect in LaCr0. 9Ru0
مـانــــــور زلـــزله
Introduction to Structured Programming
Opposition to the problem № 8 «Fair coin»
Debate Format 18 January 2018.
Problem #11 Puzzle in a beaker
Thank you.
Thank you.
Opposition 11. Grow light Opponent: Maria Krasnova Team of Belarus.
Stekolnikova Daria Voronezh - 2
Center for Research in Engineering Sciences and Technology
Shodmonov M.. The main goal of the work Analysis.
Unit 3 Review (Calculator)
Debate Format 13 January 2015.
Reviewer: Kseniya Shymborskaya
Debate Format 17 January 2019.
Review 1+3= 4 7+3= = 5 7+4= = = 6 7+6= = = 7+7+7=
Becoming a Good Test Taker
Calculate 9 x 81 = x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x =
Types of Errors And Error Analysis.
Review to the problem №22 «Montgolfiere»
Kickoff Presentation Date
Presentation transcript:

Opposition 6. Apples Opponent: Anastasiya Pantsialei Team of Belarus

Overview of the report

Summary on the report Strong points Weak points Simple methods Explanations of theory Determination … Wrong assumption of the role of iron in the oxidation process Insufficient science of method No clear explanations for dependencies

Points for discussion Accuracy of the method 0,5-2,2mg iron in 100g apples Large error of measurement Calculation of results Other methods to confirm the results

Summary

Thank you for attention! Opponent: Anastasiya Pantsialei Team of Belarus