Beau James Brock Manasseh, Gill, Knipe & Belanger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
/0403 © 2004 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLRs Training Presentations Privacy Issues in the Workplace.
Advertisements

What to when you have an unexpected OSHA inspection.
H,F # v11 “AMBUSH” INTERVIEWS Dealing with the Surprise Government Interview David M. RosenfieldJoseph P. Dooley CounselManaging Director Herrick,
Association of Corporate Counsel Houston Chapter Meeting of June 8, 2010 What to Do When the Feds Come Knocking In-House Responsibilities for Criminal.
National Health Information Privacy and Security Week Understanding the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule.
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
Participants in a Criminal Trial. Principles Canada’s criminal justice system has two fundamental principles: an accused person is innocent until proven.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Introduction to Interviewing and Investigating.
© Copyright 2014 Saul Ewing LLP Who’s That Knocking On The Door: Preparing For OIG Audits and Investigations Timothy J. Lyon, Esq.
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
Ethics in Business Research
Bad Situations Become Worse The Migration of Family Law Issues into Criminal Cases By Larry Pozner, Esq. Hoffman Reilly Pozner & Williamson LLP 511 Sixteenth.
Section 2.2.
ISSUES IN FBI LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO COUNTER-TERRORISM INVESTIGATIONS Ranjana Natarajan National Security Clinic University of Texas School of Law.
Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.
Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations, Second Edition
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS.  Review the Complaint Is the complaint within the jurisdiction of your agency? If not, forward to appropriate agency.Is the complaint.
Section 2.2.
INSPECTIONS AND SEARCHES PREPARATION AND RESPONSE Richard E. Glaze, Jr. Balch & Bingham LLP Atlanta, GA AWMA August 3, 2011.
ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS – INFRINGEMENT SEIZURE IN FRANCE Didier Intès French & European Patent attorney AIPPI – November 7, 2013.
WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE KNOCKS DOJ Enforcement Trends: What to Expect and How to Respond Jacqueline Arango Shareholder Akerman Senterfitt.
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
Criminal Procedure Week 2. U.S. CONSTITUTION PURPOSE WHICH GOVERNMENT IT REGULATES Bill of Rights.
Laws and Resources. Understanding Case Law  Technology is evolving at an exponential pace  Existing laws and statutes can’t keep up change  Case law.
Material Covered in Assignment 4-1: The Attorney-Client Privilege A. Rationale for the Attorney-Client Privilege (p. 318) B. Criteria for Attorney-Client.
Trial Procedures Law 120 MHS Mr. Binet.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
1. Importance of Being Prepared Before OSHA Arrives During an OSHA Inspection After OSHA Leaves Informal Conference Contesting Citation 2.
Session 5 Anti-Money Laundering & Financial Crime Conducting or Supporting the Investigation Process Presented by ERM Institute Monday, 24 February 2014.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
CJ210: Interrogation: Purpose, Guidelines, Procedures, and the Miranda Ruling Unit 6 Seminar: Miranda, Interrogation, Interviews, and other.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
Search Warrants. A search warrant… is a legal order, signed by a judge, allowing law enforcement to search a particular area or premises. Search warrants.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
The Empire Strikes Back: How to Prepare & Respond to Environmental Criminal Investigations Andre Belanger Attorney at Law Beau James Brock Attorney at.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Resolution of Fraud FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 16.
Trial Procedures Business Law Chapter 6. Trial Procedures Civil Cases are brought by individuals Civil Cases are brought by individuals Injured party.
 Know the rights people have when arrested and their potential criminal liability for the action of others  Name and describe the two typs of defenses.
MANAGEMENT of INFORMATION SECURITY, Fifth Edition
Recognizing the Client
Keeping Students and Families Safe: Healthcare Breakout Session
Requests for Records: The Office of the Registrar
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Courtroom Participants
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Safety Director Training
Investigative Applications 29.6
Tuesday, October 14th, 2014 Do Now: Under Day #1
The Participants.
Steps of a Crime.
The Criminal Justice Process
Section 2.2.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
The Litigation Process
TIPS FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR DEPOSITIONS
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
How to Handle an OSHA Inspection
Internal Investigations For Small Police and Fire Departments
Civil Pretrial Practice
YOU WILL NEED YOUR STUDY GUIDE OUT & A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Section 2.2.
On-Site Investigations
Presentation transcript:

Federal Search & Seizure What to do When the Government Raids the Plant or any Business Beau James Brock Manasseh, Gill, Knipe & Belanger Dorothy (Dee) M. Taylor Liskow & Lewis Pauline F. Hardin Jones Walker, LLC.

Government Investigations Investigations can be difficult to deal with because: You often do not know what triggered it. It could be a “whistleblower” complaint, an audit result, an initiative focusing on a particular issue, etc. Initially, you may not know whether your company and/or its employees are viewed as “targets” or merely as witnesses.

Government Investigations Tools of Government Investigators Search Warrant Catch a sample Find a particular item in a particular place Grand Jury Request for interviews Surveillance

Investigative Tools Search Warrant: a writ issued by a judge or magistrate that allow agents to search and seize tangible property (hardcopy and electronic) described in the warrant and located in a specifically identified area in the warrant. Be polite and cooperative, but do not consent to a search outside the scope of the warrant. Advise employees not to hide, destroy or alter documents.

The Search Warrant in Action No Affidavit is turned over to you. No split samples are provided. Have your environmental section perform them. No photos of where they searched given to you. No video given to you. They will ask for greater consent beyond the warrant. (like their home)

They are Leaving with… (Beau) Computers. Mirroring hard drives. Documents. Physical Evidence. Your Security tapes. Samples.

Search Warrant Interviews (BEAU) The Agents’ round up. “It’s a crime scene – and they are witnesses.” The Art of Deflection – not now…cooperate, later… No Miranda…

What else is coming next…(DEE) Anticipatory Search Warrants. Employees consenting to other searches. Greater surveillance. Consensual phone monitoring. Confidential Informants still there. Mr. Manager, “I just got served with a G.J. subpoena, what do I do?”

Investigative Tools (PAULINE) Search Warrant: “Do’s” Identify the lead agent and establish a line of communication. Ask the lead agent to wait until legal counsel is contacted and arrives to start the search (unlikely to agree). Request an initial sit-down with lead agent to discuss location(s) of documents identified in warrant. Fax or email copy of warrant to legal counsel. Request to inspect, and make record of, all agents credentials. Designate a representative to liaison with agents conducting search. Identify agent with IT responsibility and assign agent a company IT specialist.

Investigative Tools (Pauline) Search Warrant: “Do’s” Record agents’ responses to all requests and other communications—if possible. Try to negotiate procedure for copying items seized; at a minimum, obtain detailed receipt of seized items not copied. Request to close down business operations for the day. Notify all employees of unfolding events, whether they can leave for the day, their rights to speak (or not speak) with the agents, and right to await the arrival of counsel before deciding whether or not to do so.

Investigative Tools (DEE) Grand Jury Subpoena: A grand jury subpoena means there is a criminal investigation underway that might have very serious consequences. Agent(s) may serve the subpoena at an employee’s home instead of the workplace. It may seem like a civil subpoena, but it is not. Law enforcement has more power than any civil litigant. The agent serving the subpoena has consulted an Assistant United States Attorney, and the government has a legal and tactical plan. In a grand jury proceeding, a dispute might lead to an indictment for obstruction of justice or witness tampering.

Investigative Tools (BEAU) Grand Jury Subpoena: BEWARE: The agent serving the subpoena often will have preconceived ideas of what the “truth” is. For this reason, you should advise your client to never talk to agents without representation. Keeps the agent from catching you off guard and without benefit of any discovery or a legal strategy. Keeps the agent from seeking information, through friendly questions, while waiting to serve you with the subpoena. Talking to an agent without adequate preparation can complicate the situation. Lack of recall or precision could be interpreted as obstruction of justice or covering up.

Investigative Tools (DEE) Grand Jury Testimony: The witness’ lawyer is not entitled to be present in the grand jury with their client, but they can be present outside of the grand jury room and the witness can request to speak with them at any time. It is extremely rare to explain away a problem by testifying before a grand jury. The landscape of U.S. criminal cases is littered with individuals who have complicated their problems by testifying in the grand jury. Bottom line - Call legal counsel: Responding to a subpoena for grand jury testimony requires complex analysis that should be handled by experienced criminal defense counsel.

Investigative Tools (P) Request for Interviews: Inform employees through training about government visits and inform them that:. “Investigators have the right to contact you and to request an interview.” “You have the right to speak with investigators and to request a time and place for this interview which is convenient to you.” “You also have the right to decline to be interviewed.” “You have the right to consult with legal counsel prior to deciding whether to submit to an interview. The company has agreed to pay the costs of this consultation, and to recommend an attorney if you desire. You also have the right to retain your own attorney.”

Investigative Tools (P) Request for Interviews: For employee that consent to be interviewed, inform them that: “You have the right to have an attorney present during the interview, to confer with an attorney in advance, and to terminate the interview at any time.” “Statements made to investigators may constitute legal admissions, which may later be used as evidence against you, the company, or both, in legal proceedings.” “Remember that you should TELL THE TRUTH, and should state only matters you know to be a fact. A false statement to an investigator may constitute a criminal offense.” “You have the right to counsel before you sign any written statements.”

Investigative Tools (BEAU) Debriefing Interviewed Employees: Afterwards, counsel for the company should ask them: What the agent told them about the investigation. Whether the agent identified the targets of the investigation. What the agent told them about any alleged wrongdoing. What questions the agents asked: The questions asked are just as important as the interviewee’s answers since the questions can help counsel determine the focus and breadth of the investigation. What answers they gave the agent.

The Best Prevention is a Plan Train employees about what to do in the event of an investigation. Designate a team of individuals, including in-house counsel and compliance officers, tasked to respond to “the government’s knock” on your door. Team should include outside counsel and perhaps even a public relations person. Designate a representative for each site and make sure they are trained how to respond to all types of inspections and investigations. Maintain a list of qualified defense counsel whom you can call in the event of a civil or criminal investigation.