USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Advertisements

Module N° 6 – Prescription/Performance based environment.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
ICAO Safety Oversight Audit and Safety Oversight Status in Nepal
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010
Presentation of the proposed Annex 19 – Safety Management
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
EASA Verification Milen Dentchev ANS Standardisation Section Manager.
Page 1 USOAP CMA on SSP – Rollout. Page 2 Annex 19 Adopted by the Council on 25 February 2013; Became effective on 15 July 2013; and Became applicable.
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations (ICCAIA)
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Annex 19 Safety Management 1st edition
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Presented to: Pacific Aviation Directors’ Workshop By: Jim Spillane, Sr. FAA Representative, Pacific Rim Date: 3/14/2012 Transition to the USOAP Continuous.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office 1 ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
Harmonizing AOC & Operations Specifications. April 2008ICAO harmonization of the AOC & Ops Specs Outline Historical and current situation – ICAO Problem.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
The Canadian USOAP Experience
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Requirements - background
USOAP Comprehensive Systems Approach
6-1. 항공안전평가프로그램 항공안전본부 항공기술과 항공사무관 이광희 6-1. 항공안전평가프로그램 항공안전본부 항공기술과 항공사무관 이광희
AIS-AIMG/1-SN No.6. 19/11/08 AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES TO AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STUDY GROUP (AIS-AIMSG)
An Update Of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme An Update Of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme.
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
AIS-AIMG/1-SN No.6.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
Juan Vázquez Sanz EUROCONTROL SRU
System of Systems (DRAFT) To be approved by the ICAO Council
Technical Oversight Working Group
ICAO USOAP CMA Seminar Exercise 1: LEG/02 – Article 83 bis
NAM/CAR/SAM Quality Assurance Workshop Gustavo De León
HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/7
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
COSCAP-SEA Work Programme Discussion Paper 3
USOAP CMA Workshop Module 5 Updates on CMA Online Framework and
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP Presented by: ESAF Regional Office
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Module 5 Functionalities of the CMA Online Framework
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
NCMC/2 – P/* Name of State/Territory Second Regional Meeting for National Continuous Monitoring Coordinators (NCMCs) Presented by ***/NCMC November.
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Amendment 40 to ANNEX 15 Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
AIM Global Strategy Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
AIS Manual (Doc 8126) Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
PANS-AIM (Doc 10066) Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
COSCAP – SOUTH ASIA 19th MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO SAFETY INITIATIVES Certification of Aerodromes
USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE
RSOO Role in Relation to New ICAO Strategies
NCMC/3 – P/* Name of State/Territory Third Regional Meeting for National Continuous Monitoring Coordinators (NCMCs) Presented by ***/NCMC November.
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Briefing to ICAO TCB Seminar
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop Module 3 Information on the amendments to the Protocol Questions (PQs)

Objective The objective of this module is to inform States about: the PQ revision; their applicability (May 2013); their impact on the LEI; and actions to be taken by States as a result of these changes.

Outline Overview of the PQ revision Change in PQ methodology Mapping between old and revised PQs The impact of PQ revision on PQ status Highlights of PQ changes per audit area Actions required by States

Overview of the PQ revision

Overview of the PQ revision In preparation for USOAP CMA, all PQs from the CSA cycle were revised and updated to reflect the latest changes in ICAO provisions. Note: The review also took into consideration comments from States, ICAO (ROs, ANB, etc.), USOAP audit team members and external stakeholders. In the future, PQs will be reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to reflect emerging issues and changes in Annex provisions and guidance materials.

Overview of the PQ revision These summary of amendments tables are now available on the OLF under the CMA Library icon. Extract A summary of amendments for each of the 8 audit areas has been provided for States.

Overview of the PQ revision The new USOAP CMA has a total of 1016 PQs addressing the 8 audit areas. Deleted PQs: 15 PQs merged with other PQs: 53 New PQs: 105 Several PQs revised 5 PQs without a CE assignment have been deleted. (final numbers may vary slightly)

Overview of the PQ revision Revised PQ template layout Update of references (in “ICAO Ref.” column) to reflect recent changes to applicable ICAO documents; Enhanced contents in “Guidance for review of PQ” column; and Reassignment of CEs associated with some PQs. Other related PQs linked to this PQ

Change in PQ methodology (F&R based to PQ based)

Change in PQ methodology (F&R based to PQ based) Old system New system ORG/01 ORG/01 ORG PEL ANS . Finding text One CAP/CAP update 2.011 One CAP assessment 3.101 7.327 2.011 3.101 3.103 4.027 5.021 5.023 5.045 7.031 7.053 7.203 7.271 7.327 … Finding text The current organizational structure of the CAD is not determined in sufficient detail as to provide a clear definition of the regulatory and safety oversight functions and responsibilities related to PEL, IOS, AIR< ANS and AGA. In addition, the available organizational charts have not been approved yet. One CAP/CAP update including: Item 1 . Item 20 One CAP assessment -Previous cycle findings and recommendations -New cycle PQ findings

Mapping between old and revised PQs

PQs in CMA Online Framework As of 1 January 2013 All modules of CMA online framework have been launched based on old PQs Revised PQs are available online – CMA Library As of 1 May 2013 All modules of CMA online framework will be updated with revised PQs

Mapping between old and revised PQs F&R CAP/CAP Update OLD PQ NEW PQ OPS-01 OPS-01 OPS 4.037 Merged LEG 1.107 ANS-01 ANS-01 ANS 7.041 AGA-01 AGA-01 AGA 8.043 Divided AGA 8.327 AGA-01 AGA-01 AGA 8.327 AGA 8.328 Deleted Subject for merging example: Empowerment of inspectors Subject for dividing example: Aerodrome operating procedures OLD: - 8.327: Regulations and procedures New – 8.327 Regulations only New 8.328 Procedures only Deleted example: LEG 1.301: Not relevant to LEG.. LEG-01 LEG-01 LEG 1.301 - Newly added ORG 2.010

Revised PQ status Status: Archived Details of Revision Deleted (-) New (+) Moved From other Area to other Area Broken & Added Deleted &Merged Status: Archived PQs and their status will disappear from user Interface for States and ICAO

Revised PQ status Status: (S, NS, NA) No Change Status: New PQ Details of Revision Deleted (-) New (+) Moved From other Area to other Area Broken & Added Deleted &Merged Status: (S, NS, NA) No Change Status: New PQ They will not: have (S, NS, NA) status until validated affect the LEI

New PQs status will be based on the status of old PQ Revised PQ status Details of Revision Deleted (-) 2. New (+) Moved From other Area to other Area Broken & Added Deleted &Merged OLD PQ NEW PQs AIR 5.121(NS) AIR 5.121(NS) OPS 4.017(NS) New PQs status will be based on the status of old PQ

Revised PQ status Details of Revision Deleted (-) 2. New (+) Moved From other Area to other Area Broken & Added Deleted &Merged OLD PQs NEW PQ OLD PQs NEW PQ LEG 1.205 (S) LEG 1.205 (S) LEG 1.205 (NS) LEG 1.205 (S) PEL 3.011 (NS) PEL 3.011 (NA) OPS 4.421 (S) OPS 4.421 (S) If the status of any of the old PQs is NS the new PQ status is NS If the status of any of the old PQs is S or NA, the new PQ status is S

Mapping status summary Deleted PQs will not be counted, regardless of their previous status. For deleted PQs which have now been merged with other existing or new PQs, USOAP CMA will adopt the following approach: S N/S N/S S S S If the deleted PQ is (S), it will not impact the status of the existing or new PQ to which it has been merged; If the deleted PQ is (N/S), the status of the existing or new PQs will automatically change to (N/S); and If the deleted PQ is (N/A), the status of the existing or new PQ will remain unchanged. N/A S S N/A N/S N/S

PQ assessment options Status of “not satisfactory” PQs may be changed by CMO on the basis of existing evidence provided for some PQs related to CE-1 to CE-5. PQs related to CE-6, CE-7 and CE-8 will typically require an evaluation through an on-site USOAP CMA activity to verify effective implementation.

The impact of PQ revision on PQ status

The impact of PQ revision on LEI New PQs are not automatically assessed. PQs are validated after evidence is provided. LEIs change after the PQ is validated. Assessment of new PQs may be carried out through offsite or onsite activity will determine depending on the CE.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area All audit areas Addition of new PQs on new ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) and guidance material; Moving of certain LEG and ORG PQs to other audit areas (i.e. OPS and ANS); and Harmonization of text for PQs to attain common terminology for ease of understanding.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area LEG Area-specific PQs previously under LEG are now moved to the relevant audit areas, such as: 2 PQs on interception of civil aircraft  OPS and ANS; PQ on units of measurement  ANS; and PQ on journey log book and documents to be carried on board an aircraft  OPS.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area ORG New PQs have been added on mechanisms to avoid perceived or potential conflict of interest of inspectorate staff. 5 PQs have been deleted that were not associated with any CEs (3 ORG, 1 PEL and 1 OPS; related information now obtained from State Aviation Activity Questionnaire or SAAQ).

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area PEL ICAO Reference column revised to include: ICAO Doc 9379 — Manual of Procedures for Establishment and Management of a State’s Personnel Licensing System (Second Edition).

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area OPS 2 PQs on flight data recorders have been moved to AIR (AIR PQs 5.204 and 5.205). The following PQs have been moved from LEG to OPS: 1 PQ on interception of civil aircraft; 1 PQ on journey log book; and 1 PQ on documents to be carried on board an aircraft.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area AIR New PQs have been added, examples: Aircraft registration (identification plate and use of registration marks ); Safety Management System; and AIR-related approval of CAT II and III instrument approaches.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area AIG New PQs have been added on procedures for inclusion of safety recommendations in draft final report forwarded to States and organizations concerned.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area ANS Revision includes PQs on: New RVSM monitoring requirements; Performance-based navigation (PBN) implementation; Implementation of SMS/State Safety Programme (SSP); and Runway safety programme.

Highlights of PQ changes per audit area AGA PQs associated with multiple CEs (CE-2, CE-5, CE-6 and CE-7) are split into PQs associated with single CEs. New CE-2 PQs have been added to address all chapters of Annex 14, Volume I. New PQs have been added on minimum qualifications for aerodrome inspectors.

Actions required by States

Actions required by States Using the OLF, States shall: Continuously update PQ compliance status; Provide evidence related to compliance; Reply promptly to MIRs; Follow-up on status of compliance of merged PQs; and Continuously update SAAQ and the CCs/EFOD.

Review Overview of the PQ revision Change in PQ methodology Mapping between old and revised PQs The impact of PQ revision on PQ status Highlights of PQ changes per audit area Actions required by States What conditions will generate PQ changes in the future? In the future, PQs will be reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to reflect emerging issues and changes in Annex provisions and guidance materials. Will Protocol Findings in the future involve multiple or individual PQs? Individual PQs When will the new PQs become effective? As of 1 May 2013-All modules of CMA online framework will be updated with revised PQs When will a new PQ have the (S, NS, NA) status? After validation What are the 2 options for PQ validation? Offsite validation (with reference with CE-1 to CE-5) Onsite validation activity (CE-1-CE-8)