Assessment Form for Periodic Reporting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.
Advertisements

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Management Effectiveness in Multiple Sites Sue Stolton, Equilibrium, UK.
World Heritage Periodic reporting Latin America and the Caribbean Carolina Castellanos / Mexico.
General Analysis of the (European) Questionnaire Jorun Poettering Consultant WHC.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
Presentation and Management of Heritage Assets
2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites ICOMOS Discussion points.
Developing a Knowledge and Understanding of English Language Teaching Resources Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Standards.
DIGIT Directorate-General for Informatics DIGIT Directorate-General for Informatics EUSURVEY Creating online surveys DIGIT EUSURVEY SUPPORT.
The Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit Sue Stolton, Equilibrium Research, UK.
Management Effectiveness Training Seminar: Europarc 2008 Management effectiveness assessments – a tool for maintaining high standards in protected area.
Interagency Cooperation Dr Laura Cleary. Scope Terminology Rationale Benefits National Security Strategy & Border Management: Two Examples Critical Factors.
Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool. 902 METT assessments included in the global study A major data source.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Management Effectiveness and Quality Criteria in European Protected Areas: April 2008 World Heritage Convention and the Assessment of Management Effectiveness.
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Module INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Module
Microsoft Office 2013: In Practice Chapter 2 Using Design View, Data Validation, and Relationships Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
RESULTS OF SECTION II 1 Final meeting of the Second Cycle of the Periodic Reporting exercise for the Latin America and Caribbean Region. 2 – 5 December.
2 e Periodic reporting exercise for Europe Sub-regional workshop for Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe Tbilissi 14 – 16 November 2012.
UNESCO ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, Periodic reporting for World Heritage … Proposed list of ‘Factors affecting World Heritage’
OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE
This submission will be used by Area of Distinction Juries and the Caudill Class Jury. The slides may also be paired with jury comments in the Convention.
Processes related to the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting Sub-regional Workshop for World Heritage National Focal Points in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern.
Main conclusions of the previous Meetings on World Heritage Periodic Reporting Reflection Meeting of the Periodic Reporting Reflection Year UNESCO Headquarters,
How to develop a questionnaire. a structured series of written questions that generally ask respondents to select from a limited set of possible answers.
Experts reflection meeting on the state of World Heritage properties: Theme 2: Management „issues“ Rapporteur: Birgitta Ringbeck Dakar, 15. April 2011.
Iain Wheeldon.  Issues & Ideas: ICS8038 (20 Credits)  Management: ICS8039 (20 Credits)  Communication & Interpretation: ICS8040 (20 Credits)  Heritage.
Submission Requirements & Instructions
WEB TESTING
Integration of sustainable development approach
Setting Best-Practice Standards for World Heritage Management
Carol Levin, PhD Department of Global Health
Lecture 23 Collecting Primary data through Questionnare
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
2007 Reflection Year on Periodic Reporting
Europe’s Environment Assessment of Assessments EE-AoA 2011
The revised Periodic Reporting Questionnaires: general features Alessandra Borchi Policy and Statutory Meetings Section UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
ECOLNET Training Approach
ECOLNET Training Approach
Competence Pack Guide to Assessment.
Discussion and collecting ideas Session 1
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Competence Pack Guide to Assessment.
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Biodiversity Learning Manager, Field Studies Council.
Summary of Scoping Document and feedback
Session 5.2. Step 4.c. Reporting
Sustainable Development
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
ECOLNET Training Approach
Assessment of quality of standards
Assessment of current management plan (EoH Tool 5)
Management Strategy for Natura 2000 sites in Finland
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Guidance Document - Generic Outline
Chapter 8 Using Document Collaboration and Integration Tools
Quality Management Anita Téringer– ITS Hungary
GENERATING ISSUE-ORIENTED STATISTICS AND INDICATORS
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Portfolio Committee on Communications
Revised emission reporting Guidelines – Projection issues
The Statement of Significance (SoS)
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Form for Periodic Reporting Sue Stolton and Carolina Castellanos

Key Points re Design Support and input from many sources Assessment against best practice Simpler for managers to complete Easier for statistical analysis and correlations of key questions Text fields for comments linked to summary table Linked to OG Word document – hot off the press!

Key Elements Part of an electronic tool Assessment form: links and assesses the information verified in the datasheet and generates the information for the summary table Provides breadth of information for managers, state party and WHC

Contents Outstanding Universal Value Factors affecting the property (OUV, Integrity and authenticity) Boundary and buffer zones Protective measures (legislation and regulation) Management systems Resources: Finance and Infrastructure

Human resources, expertise and training Visitor use Education, information and awareness building Research Monitoring World Heritage Status Assessment of the Periodic Reporting Exercise

Format of Questionnaire Three types of questions Yes/No questions Ranking: three of four scale rankings from good to poor Multiple choice questions: from best practice to poor practice Questions Compulsory questions Questions when appropriate (i.e. related to buffer zones, indigenous people) Discretionary boxes (limited characters)

Key Points re Text Standard terminology Simple language (easy to translate and inline with the OG) Current text draft but main areas covered

Types of Questions 8.1 Are there statistics on visitation to the property? Yes No

8.2 Please rate the availably to visitors to the WH property of the following? (Rating on a 3 point scale on adequacy: excellent, adequate, poor, not provided)   Visitor centre Site museum Information booths Guided tours Trails / routes Information materials Transportation facilities Other

10.2 Is there a planned programme of research at that property which is directed towards management needs and/or improving understanding of OUV? Tick one box only There is no research taking place in the WH property or buffer zone, despite an identified need. There is a small amount of research, but it is not planned. There is considerable research but it is not directed towards management needs and/or improving understanding of OUV There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of research, which is relevant to management needs and/or improving understanding of OUV

Next Steps Period of comment and reflection ‘Informal’ field testing of content Elaboration of uses, statistical analysis and possible correlations