Benoit Tesson, Michael I. Latz  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Direct Measurements of the Mechanical Stability of Zinc-Thiolate Bonds in Rubredoxin by Single-Molecule Atomic Force Microscopy Peng Zheng, Hongbin Li.
Advertisements

Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages (October 2013)
Mechanical Stability and Reversible Fracture of Vault Particles
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Sukant Mittal, Ian Y. Wong, William M. Deen, Mehmet Toner 
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Hydration Force in the Atomic Force Microscope: A Computational Study
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
M. Maraldi, C. Valero, K. Garikipati  Biophysical Journal 
Guillaume T. Charras, Mike A. Horton  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Local Viscoelastic Properties of Live Cells Investigated Using Dynamic and Quasi-Static Atomic Force Microscopy Methods  Alexander Cartagena, Arvind Raman 
Susanne Karsch, Deqing Kong, Jörg Großhans, Andreas Janshoff 
Maxim E. Dokukin, Nataliia V. Guz, Igor Sokolov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Tensile Properties of Single Desmin Intermediate Filaments
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Volume 96, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Mapping Diffusion in a Living Cell via the Phasor Approach
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Stiffness Tomography by Atomic Force Microscopy
Anton Arkhipov, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Klaus Schulten 
Regulation of Contraction by the Thick Filaments in Skeletal Muscle
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher 
Thermal Memory in Self-Assembled Collagen Fibril Networks
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Formed by Hybrid Films of Agarose and Lipids Display Altered Mechanical Properties  Rafael B. Lira, Rumiana Dimova, Karin A.
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Critical Timing without a Timer for Embryonic Development
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanics of Biomimetic Liposomes Encapsulating an Actin Shell
Actin-Regulator Feedback Interactions during Endocytosis
Juan Guan, Harrison Liu, Xiaoyu Shi, Siyu Feng, Bo Huang 
The Elastic Properties of the Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Real-Time Nanoscopy by Using Blinking Enhanced Quantum Dots
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Chemically Mediated Mechanical Expansion of the Pollen Tube Cell Wall
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Motility at High Pressure
Ave Minajeva, Michael Kulke, Julio M. Fernandez, Wolfgang A. Linke 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Change in Rigidity in the Activated Form of the Glucose/Galactose Receptor from Escherichia coli: A Phenomenon that Will Be Key to the Development of.
Inherent Force-Dependent Properties of β-Cardiac Myosin Contribute to the Force- Velocity Relationship of Cardiac Muscle  Michael J. Greenberg, Henry Shuman,
Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Ralf Blossey, Fabrizio Cleri 
The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Bekele Gurmessa, Shea Ricketts, Rae M. Robertson-Anderson 
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Ricksen S. Winardhi, Qingnan Tang, Jin Chen, Mingxi Yao, Jie Yan 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

Mechanosensitivity of a Rapid Bioluminescence Reporter System Assessed by Atomic Force Microscopy  Benoit Tesson, Michael I. Latz  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages 1341-1351 (March 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Images of a living Pyrocystis lunula cell. (A) Cantilever probe with approximate position of attached glass sphere (circle) positioned over the cell. (B) Same cell without the cantilever. (C) Scanning electron micrograph of the cantilever with attached 10 μm diameter glass sphere. Scale bar for all panels is 20 μm. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1341-1351DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of the living Pyrocystis lunula cell surface as imaged by atomic force microscopy. (A) Low-resolution image showing a grid pattern. Scan size is 10 μm. Inset: high-resolution image of the cell surface. Scan size is 2 μm. (B) Height (Z) profile of the cell surface from (A) inset. (C) Low-resolution image of elongated structures, which may be extruded trichocysts, occasionally imaged on the cell surface of Pyrocystis lunula by atomic force microscopy. Scan size is 9.4 μm. Inset: high-resolution image of a trichocyst. Scan size is 2 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1341-1351DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cumulative percentage of Pyrocystis lunula cells responding at (A) constant stimulation velocity of 390 μm s−1 and various forces, and (B) constant force of 14.5 μN and various velocities. For each experiment, the second stimulus at maximum force and velocity “(2)” always elicited a response. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1341-1351DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sequence of bioluminescence produced by a Pyrocystis lunula cell stimulated by the atomic force microscope probe. (A) The probe contacts the cell at time 0 with a force of 14.5 μN and velocity of 390 μm s−1. A flash is visible in the next frame at time 20 ms, reaches maximum intensity at time 40 ms, and then undergoes slow decay. For this cell, the flash intensity decayed to 90% of maximum in 220 ms. (B) The second flash produced by the identical cell exhibited a lower intensity and shorter duration. Both (A) and (B) have the identical intensity scaling. (C) Composite of the six flashes produced by the identical cell based on the maximum intensity of emission. The images are autoscaled so that the background appears brighter when the bioluminescence is dimmer. Scale bar for all panels is 50 μm. (D) Time course of each of the flashes, based on average pixel intensity for the region of bioluminescence. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1341-1351DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Viscoelastic properties of Pyrocystis lunula cells. (A) Force curve (solid line) fitted with the Hertz model (dashed line) used to calculate Young’s modulus. (B) Force deformation curves from a single cell measured for velocities of 20 (dashed line) and 390 μm s−1 (solid line). (C) Stress relaxation curve (dots) of a living cell fitted using the model described in D (solid line). (D) Viscoelastic model consisting of two sets of dashpot and a spring and a single spring arranged in parallel. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1341-1351DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of compressive force applied by atomic force microscopy. (A) Schematic representation of cell deformation by a colloidal probe showing relaxation mechanism. Gray arrows represent relaxation of the cell wall (gray) and blue arrows represent relaxation of the protoplast (blue). (B) Hypothetical model for strain rate dependent conformational change of mechanosensor. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1341-1351DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.009) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions