How to Interpret Student Growth Plots

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achievement & Accountability Workgroup Meeting June 20, 2014 Krissy Johnson, MPA, Data Analyst Deb Came, PhD, Director of Student Information Damian Betebenner,
Advertisements

Understanding Individual Student WESTEST 2 Growth & Achievement Report Office of Assessment and Accountability.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
MEDIAN STUDENT GROWTH ANALYSIS December 2014 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
Using the WV Growth Model to Measure Student Achievement Nate Hixson Assistant Director, Office of Research.
Understanding Quick Scores & This Year’s ChangeUnderstanding Quick Scores & This Year’s Change Dr. Nakia TownsDr. Nakia Towns Assistant Commissioner for.
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Student Growth Percentiles 1.
Parent Training California Assessment for Student
Prepared by: Scott R. Morrison Director of Curriculum and Instructional Technology 11/3/09.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
SY PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, 11 Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS contact.
PPT Presentation Template: This PPT includes all slides to present a district or building level overview of PVAAS. This was used with a district- wide.
PVAAS – Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System added_assessment_system_(pvaas)/8751.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Robert Barnoski (Barney) Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
Understanding Your Student Score Report. Let’s start with side one.
Olympia School District School Board Study Session September Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Steps of School Improvement 2014 Results MSP-HSPE-EOC.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
Student Achievement Dashboard Training. Objectives ●PWBAT understand the purpose for using the dashboard to analyze student achievement ●PWBAT understand.
ISAT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. Why is OSBE making so many changes to the ISAT? The contract between NWEA & OSBE was due to expire. Even if the contractor.
PROGRESS & & ACHIEVEMENT Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) The Power of School District School District.
Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.
1 AMP Results Overview for Educators October 30, 2015.
ACT ASPIRE GROWTH REPORTS. DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS THAT PARTICIPATED IN ACT ASPIRE ASSESSMENTS (READING, MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND WRITING) WITH AN N COUNT.
PVAAS Overview: Evaluating Growth, Projecting Performance PVAAS Statewide Core Team Fall 2008.
March 26, 2012 North Scott School Board Presentation.
Student Growth Measures ODU Leadership Conference June 19, 2014.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.
Understanding Growth and ACT Aspire Reports.
Smarter Balanced Performance Levels and Scale Scores
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
A Growth Measure for ALL Students.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Release of PARCC Student Results
Understanding My Paper Score Report
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Growth Models Oklahoma
Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model
Pre K-20 Equity Discussion Warm Up
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
South Dakota’s Growth Model
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
Exploring topics related to equity in graduation success
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Transition of PA State Assessments
Validating Student Growth During an Assessment Transition
Overview of the GSGM Student Reports for Parents
Analysing your pat data
What is an Academic Peer
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model
Overview of the GSGM Student Reports for Parents
CORE Academic Growth Model: Step-By-Step
CORE Academic Growth Model: Step-By-Step
SGP What is it and where did it come from?.
Tuesday.
District Assessment Report
A Growth Measure for ALL Students.
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Spring 2019 MCAS Grade 10 Annotated Parent/Guardian Reports
Presentation transcript:

How to Interpret Student Growth Plots The smarter balanced transition and individual student growth reports

2014 Report For students who took the MSP* in the 2013-14 school year, student reports were similar to the following: *Students who took the Smarter Balanced field test did not have scores or SGPs OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2014 Report Scale scores were represented by the white dots, with the score displayed at the bottom of the report. For example, in 2013-14, this student scored 497 on the Math MSP. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2014 Report Achievement level was also indicated both in the chart and at the bottom of the report. In 2013-14, this student was in the L4: Advanced Achievement Level. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2014 Report SGPs were indicated by colored arrows between years, with the SGP itself displayed below. In 2013-14, this student received an SGP of 88. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2014 Report Reports also displayed the growth level (low, typical, or high) with the arrow color and text at the bottom of the report. In 2013-14, this student had high growth. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

Summary of Changes to the 2015 Report With the transition to Smarter Balanced, there are changes to the 2014-15 school year reports. There are still four achievement levels, but the MSP and SBA have different scales and thus the lines showing achievement levels shift for the 2014-15 school year. The reports display two proficiency levels, one aligned with the MSP and the other with the SBA. Color “fans” for potential 2015-16 achievement levels based on high, typical, or low growth will be shown for students in grades 4-7 Field test students do not have SGPs for 2013-14 and 2014-15 school years. SGPs for the 2013-14 school year are omitted from the individual student reports since they represent baseline-referenced SGPs that have a different interpretation. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report For students who tested in the 2014-15 school year, districts received reports similar to the following. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes The change to the SBA vertical scale results in a shift in the scales and the lines designating achievement levels. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes MSP achievement (scores through 2013-14) correspond to the four achievement levels on the left. SBA achievement (2014-15 scores) correspond to the levels on the right. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes Reports for students in grades 4-7 will include a “fan” showing a potential range of scores for the next year based on observed growth of students with similar scores. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes Students who participated in the SBA field test in 2013-14 did not receive scores for that year. SGPs require two years of valid scores. Field test students therefore do not have SGPs from the 2013-14 and 2014- 15 school years. After the 2015-16 assessment, OSPI will be able to calculate SGPs for these students. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes Students who participated in the SBA field test will not have SGP data for 2013-14 or 2014-15. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes This year, the individual student reports won’t display the 2013-14 SGPs. SGPs for the 2013-14 school year used a different methodology (“baseline” SGPs) and thus are not strictly comparable to earlier years and the 2014-15 school year (“cohort” SGPs). In the 2013-14 school year, roughly 30% of Washington students took the SBA field test and did not receive scores. The MSP subset of students might not have been representative of all students, so SGPs that year compared them to Washington students of previous years. That is called the baseline method. In the 2014-15 school year, due to the change in tests, the only potential comparison was to academic peers using the Smarter Balanced test. Thus the cohort method for SGPs was used, comparing students to the current cohort of testers with scores in two consecutive years. Since the interpretations of cohort and baseline SGPS are slightly different, baseline SGPs were excluded from the reports to avoid confusion. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Changes SGPs for the 2013-14 school year will not be displayed. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

Similarities of the 2015 Reports Despite the numerous changes, student growth plots will still display the same information as past years: Scale Score Achievement Level SGP Growth Level OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Similarities Scale scores are still represented by white dots and displayed at the bottom of the report. This student received a 2784 on the SBA Math in 2014-15. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Similarities Achievement levels are still displayed. This student was in the Level 4 Achievement Level for 2014-15 SBA Math. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Similarities SGPs are still represented by arrows, with the SGP listed at the bottom. This student received an SGP of 93 for the 2014-15 school year. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

2015 Report Similarities Reports still demonstrate high, typical or low growth by the color of the arrow and the growth level is included at the bottom of the report. This student experienced high growth in the 2014-15 school year. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018

For more information Please visit the OSPI website for answers to frequently asked questions, webinars, and other materials. http://www.k12.wa.us/assessment/StudentGrowth.aspx Or contact: Ashley Colburn Nick Hassell Deb Came Data Analyst Director, Student Information ashley.colburn@k12.wa.us nick.hassell@k12.wa.us deb.came@k12.wa.us (360) 725-4984 (360) 725-0430 (360) 725-6356 OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 12/6/2018