New active substance median approval time for six regulatory authorities in 2006-2015 530 180 Key messages The last decade, 2006-2015, saw a continuation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulatory Pathway for Platform Technologies
Advertisements

UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION AUGUST, 2014 Biologics & Biosimilars: An Overview 1.
Introduction to Regulation
SOURCES OF PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION. 1-Pharmacopeias Pharmacopoeia is a book containing an official list of the drugs used in medicine together with.
Biopharmaceutical Regulatory Requirements 40. Marketing Authorization for New Chemical Entities Health Canada’s (HC) Therapeutic Products Directorate.
Pharmacologist & Toxicologist CTE Introduction. What is a Pharmacologist? Develop new drugs to cure, treat, and prevent disease. Develop new drugs to.
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
LEADERSHIP FLY-IN Washington, D.C. June 26-28, 2012 US GAPP LEADERSHIP FLY-IN Washington, D.C. June 26-28, 2012 US GAPP.
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
1 Operation of the Prescription Drug User Fee Program Janet Woodcock, M.D. Deputy Commissioner for Operations November 14, 2005.
“Supporting the Industry through Communication” The pharmaceutical industry is committed to the research, development, quality manufacturing and logistics.
GMP- A Regulatory Perspective. Regulatory Perspective in entering Global Pharma Markets.
1 COMMON TECHNICAL DOCUMENT / ORIGIN OF CTD… ICH EWG CTD WAS OFFICIALLY SIGNED OFF IN NOVEMBER 2000, AT 5 TH ICH CONFERENCE; SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA.
The association between European Medicines Agency approval and Health Technology Assessment recommendations Iga Lipska 1,2, Anke Hövels 2, Neil McAuslane.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Aspects of pharmacovigilance: Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs)
IDMP Overview December 2015.
Regulated Product Submission Eileen M. Girten, MS i3 Statprobe 1DIA Education SIAC.
Pharmacology Science that studies interactions of drugs with organism on different levels (subcellular, cellular, organ, systemic) Studies: - relationship.
iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013
Off-label Use.
Regulatory Updates Health Sciences Authority Singapore
Contingent Workforce: Cerner Quality System & Regulations
POST APPROVAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Paediatric Medicine: The Paediatric Investigation Plan
MEP Interest Group on Brain, Mind and Pain
Security Research Institute
Going Global Vincent J. Amoruccio, M.A. How Data Standards
FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development
Presentation on Good Manufacturing Practice
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
The percentage of NASs approved by CDER
NASs approval time by therapeutic area:
Median 25th and 75th percentile
Median approval time for new active substances approved by ICH agencies by approval year Methodology For each new active substance (NAS) approved between.
Comparing HTA recommendations
Ten Quality Decision-Making Practices for organisational decision making for pharmaceutical company leadership team and sub-teams In order for organisations.
Speeding access to therapies
Percentage Key Message
2002–2006 Mid and Other sized companies continued to launch the majority of NMEs APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON.
Median submission gap, median approval time and percentage approved as expedited for new active substances (NASs) approved by six authorities:
Median time to internationalisation
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
New active substances approved by EMA and FDA over 10 years
EMA: The European Medicines Agency
From Regulatory Approval to Subsidized Patient Access in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparison of Systems Across Australia, China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand,
“Metro Map” analysis of FDA facilitated regulatory pathways and their influence on median approval times  The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has.
Building quality in HTA process and decision making
NME/NAS launches in 2005/6 APRIL 2007
Implantable Medical Devices: Accelerating Standards Development to Streamline Regulation Joshua Price | August 2,
Fundamentals of Electronic Submissions and eCTD
Rollout time breakdown: 24 common NASs in 7 jurisdictions
INTERNATIONALISATION – FOCUS ON EMA AND FDA
Development time for new molecular entities first launched onto the world market between MARCH 2008 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS.
Cycle times decreased in larger but not smaller, companies
Drug-device combinations regulated as medicines - Revised regulatory
HPRA preparedness for Brexit
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Median, Box : 25th and 75th percentiles
Assessment routes and timelines in Australia (2011)
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
Assessment of quality decision making in regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies with QoDoS (Quality of Decision Making Orientation Scheme) Not.
BioCapital Europe 2019, Amsterdam
Introduction to Basic Research Methods
Out of the 52 NASs approved by all six authorities during :
Median times to submission and licensing for 70 new active substances approved in five markets from 1997 to 2010 Note: EMA approval.
FDA Regulation of Animal Biotechnology Products
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Assessment routes and timelines
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
Presentation transcript:

New active substance median approval time for six regulatory authorities in 2006-2015 530 180 Key messages The last decade, 2006-2015, saw a continuation of the convergence and general decrease in the approval times amongst six major regulatory authorities, namely the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the US Food and Drug Authority (FDA), the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), Health Canada, Swissmedic and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The difference in median approval time between the fastest and the slowest agency decreased from 530 days in 2006 to 180 days in 2015. This may reflect the improving quality of submissions from companies, as well as implementation of quality measures by agencies, such as pre-submission activities in order to verify the quality of the dossier ahead of the review. In 2015, PMDA was the agency with the shortest median approval time (284 days), followed by FDA (351), Health Canada (355), TGA (373), EMA (417) and Swissmedic (464). The gap between FDA and PMDA has further widened in 2015 to 67 days. Amongst the cohort of EMA, Health Canada, TGA and FDA the gap is similar at 66 days, but has been narrowing. The large drop in the PMDA approval times that has occurred since the beginning of the decade reflects the continual improvements and resource commitments made by the agency. Although the FDA timing has increased slightly since 2013, this likely reflects the pre-Prescription Drug User Fee (PDUFA) two-month filing period introduced to the review timeline under the fifth iteration of PDUFA. This modification aims to enable further improvements to company submission quality and to optimise the FDA review process and increase the number of one-cycle approvals. From: Bujar M, McAuslane N, Liberti L. 2016. R&D Briefing 59: The impact of the evolving regulatory environment on the approval of new medicines across six major authorities 2006-2015. Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science. Definitions: New active substance (NAS): A chemical, biological, biotechnology or radiopharmaceutical substance that has not been previously available for therapeutic use in humans and is destined to be made available as a ‘prescription only medicine’, to be used for the cure, alleviation, treatment, prevention or in vivo diagnosis of diseases in humans; Approval time: Time calculated from the date of submission to the date of approval by the agency. This time includes agency and company time. © CIRS, R&D Briefing 59 Approval year *The EMA approval time includes the EU Commission time.