1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCIC Perioperative Initiative February 14, 2006 Operating Room Briefings.
Advertisements

Critical Event Review (Root Cause Analysis)
Your Class Jeopardy Your Name Topic Life Earth Space Grab Bag II Physical.
Universal Protocol Guide for Anesthesia Nerve Blocks
Implementation of a Surgical Safety Check List
Building Your SUSP Team Part II
Introduction to Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar March 2013.
Ensuring Patient Safety In Radiology June 2007 John Thomas.
© 2011 Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority Applying the Universal Protocol to Improve Patient Safety in Radiology Services Theresa V. Arnold, D.P.M.
Introducing the Checklist 101: Hard Lessons Learned From Life Bill Berry, MD, MPH Sunil Eappen, MD Lizzie Edmondson.
Department Spotlight: The Operating Room (OR) Data Problem As much as 40 percent of a hospital’s budget goes to OR expenses, specifically, the cost of.
Cohesive Approach to Surgery PSAC ǀ Ministry of Health ǀ BCMA ǀ Health Authorities ǀ BCPSQC November 16, 2012.
Universal Protocol for Correct Site Surgery/Procedures and Kaleida Health’s Protocols What is it? How does it apply to you? Who is responsible? When will.
Creating a Culture of Safety: Challenges in Ophthalmology James P. Bagian, MD, PE Director, Center for Health Engineering University of Michigan Founding.
SAFE ACCOUNT Dana M. Langness, RN, BSN, MA Senior Director – Perioperative Services Regions Hospital, St. Paul.
The Perioperative Nursing Role January 12th, 2009.
Certification of Central Venous Lines Georgia Health Sciences Medical Center Augusta, Georgia November 13, 2012.
HealthGov Conference December 2007 “CASE STUDY – REMOVAL OF THE WRONG BREAST” The uneasy balance between systematic/individual responsibility Helen.
Enhancing Safety for Patients With Limited English Proficiency
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
Safety Basic Science December 22 nd, Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns.
Pre-operative Assessment and Intra operative Nursing Role
Revised for 2013 Shannon Hein RN, CPN(C).  published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in May 2004  Found an overall incidence rate of adverse.
Morning Briefings and Huddles
Talking to Your Nursing and Surgical Tech Colleagues.
PATIENT SAFETY through COMMUNICATION March 11, 2008.
Call 3: Background of Each Checklist Item. Topics Covered on the Last Webinar Review of articles that have been written about the impact of the checklist.
Topic 10 Patient safety and invasive procedures. Learning objective The objective of this topic is to understand the main causes of adverse events in.
National Patient Safety Goals 2011
Operating Room Orientation For Medical Students Angela L. Lawrence, BSN, RN, MPA, CNOR.
To remain compliant with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME®) regulations, it is necessary to disclose to my audience that.
244 responses A Questionnaire on the Prevention of Wrong-sided Nerve Blocks in the North Western Deanery Lie J 1 & Naylor K 2 1 Specialty Trainee (ST6),
Project JOINTS: Joining Organizations IN Tackling SSIs Use of an alcohol-containing antiseptic agent for pre-op skin prep.
Call 7: Review Call and the Importance of Hospital Visits.
Department of Quality and Regulatory Affairs Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center The Karmanos Cancer Center Regulatory Readiness (for Non Clinical Staff)
Survey Methodology Four Point Scale Very SatisfiedSatisfiedDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied.
Pre-Procedure Checklist Verification of patient, procedure, site at time of admission or entry Relevant documents match to the correct patient, procedure.
Ward Round Note Study/Audit Professor Hill’s Team Grand Rounds Presentation
Check-In Call. Welcome Back Where Are You? 1.What is the percentage of cases that now use the South Carolina Checklist? –< 50% –> 50% –Every team uses.
Topic 10 Patient safety and invasive procedures. LEARNING OBJECTIVE The objective of this topic is to understand the main causes of adverse events in.
Preventing Surgical Infections Through Effective Perioperative Antibiotic Administration Project Team Members: Anesthesia Infectious Disease Pharmacy Surgical.
Check-In Call June 21 st, Welcome Back Today’s Topics A series of polls Common barriers Checklists for special needs Monitoring your progress How.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission 2015 National Patient Safety Goals.
PRI 1 Introduction to Perioperative Nursing A Primer for Perioperative Education.
A site check to prevent wrong side blocks
Introduction to Universal Protocol (Pre-Procedure “Time-Out”) Office of Graduate Medical Education Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania.
The Implementation of Medication Reconciliation in PAC Enhancing Patient Safety The Implementation of Medication Reconciliation in PAC Enhancing Patient.
SURGICAL FORMS AND RECORDS. TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Complete selected forms and records.
Mutual Support. Mutually supportive??? Mutual support & teamwork  Willingness and preparedness to assist others, and to ask for assistance when needed.
Patient Identification at DUH “ALWAYS the Right Patient” We put the person who needs our care at the center of everything we do Requirements for Staff.
Increasing Post-Surgical Debriefing Completion Rate Quality Improvement Study Ambulatory Surgery Center.
HANDOFF REPORTING Using SBAR for exchange of information.
STOP THE LINE! For patient safety.
Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC
The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals
Operating Room Nursing
Implementation of a Surgical Safety Check List
Pre-Induction Time Out
Pre-operative Assessment and Intra operative Nursing Role
Tools & Strategies Summary
The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals
Improve the Safety of Using Medications
ADMISSION TO THE OPERATING ROOM SUITE
Questionnaire Ensuring Correct Surgery and Invasive Procedures
Universal Protocol Module 2 Patient Identification
The Assessment Process Part I
Education Abroad Program Director Training
Universal Protocol Module 2 Patient Identification
Presentation transcript:

1

Minnesota Safe Surgery Coalition Coalition Goal: Eliminate Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure and Wrong Patient Events within 3 Years. Members Minnesota Hospital Association Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Medical Association Minnesota Medical Group Management Association MMIC Group 2

The Minnesota Time Out Campaign Phase 1 of the Safe Surgery Project Targets Wrong Site Events Objective: Administration, physicians and front-line staff will join together to hold each other accountable for conducting robust, effective Time Outs for every patient, every invasive procedure, every time. Kick-off on National Time Out Day (June 15) 3

Why is the Campaign Necessary? Reports of adverse events involving procedures performed on the wrong site/side/level have been increasing in Minnesota. Last year, 66% of wrong site procedures were on the wrong side (right vs. left). 4

Sample Minnesota Events The Anesthesia Care Provider inserted the needle to perform an anesthesia block.  The patient felt a twitch in their leg and stated that the twitch was on the left side and the surgery should be on the right side. The patient was correct. No site marking or Time Out had been performed for the block. Site mark for right stent placement placed on arm and was not visible after prepping and draping. Left stent placement performed. Site mark was not visualized during the Time Out.

Sample Minnesota Events Surgeon consulted on patients in two different rooms. Surgeon performed knee aspiration on incorrect side thinking it was the other patient. Patient identity was not verified and Time Out was not performed. Patient consented to left knee arthroscopy. Right leg placed in holder and tourniquet placed.  Surgical site had been marked but when initials were not seen on the right leg surgeon thought marked was removed by surgical prep.  Site marked was not visualized during the Time Out.

Sample Minnesota Events Patient consent for a right knee arthroscopy. All documents indicated right knee and right knee was site marked by surgeon. Surgeon and nurse put leg holder on left side of table and positioned left leg in holder.  Left knee injected, prepped and draped.  Time Out conducted and incision made to left knee.  When nurse started documentation, she noted that the left knee was intended and informed the surgeon.   Site mark was not visualized during the Time Out. All members of the team were not engaged in the Time Out process.

Why Focus on Time-Out? Almost all of the 2010 wrong site procedures in Minnesota were breakdowns in basic best practices - primarily in the Time Out process. Observational studies of time out in Minnesota ORs show that: Site mark not visualized Source documents not referenced Stating “I agree” rather than independent verification In a number of instances, such as an anesthesia block prior to a surgical procedure, there was no process in place to conduct site marking and a Time Out. 8

Development of MN Time Out Developed by University of MN Center for Human Factors Research and Design Observed 58 procedures across 8 hospitals Direct observations Focus groups

Addressing Gaps MN Time Out addresses observed gaps Uncertainty about initiation No cessation of activity No acknowledgement of accuracy of information No referral to source documents No or incorrect site marks Team members not cognitively engaged

Minnesota Time Out Step Rationale 1. Person performing procedure initiates The team is more likely to cease activity and come together for the Time Out. 2. Team ceases all activity Active listening/participation. 3. Designated staff, other than person performing procedure (OR – circulator), verbally states patient name, procedure and location while referring to source documents. (In the OR, ACP also provides patient name and procedure from their documentation). -Surgeon is the last to verify to control for hierarchy/power differential, i.e. if the surgeon states information first, the team is more likely to agree rather than provide independent verification. -Source documents have been verified prior to the procedure and should be an accurate source of information. 4. Designated staff, other than person performing procedure (OR – scrub), locates and verbally confirms visualization of site mark and states where it is located. -Providing an active role (rather than “I agree”) for all team members counters rote recitation. -Team members more likely to be cognitively engaged in the process. 5. Person performing procedure verbally states procedure including location from memory. Decreases memory interference to focus on this procedure. 11

Call to Action for Physicians All steps of the Time Out must be conducted before every invasive procedure for every patient, every time. Key areas where a Time Out is not consistently applied across the state: OR procedures Blocks and injections prior to OR procedures Stand alone anesthesia blocks Interventional radiology procedures

Stop the Line Practice Any person who observes or becomes aware of harmful situation in patient care has the authority and responsibility to speak up and request the process be stopped in order to clarify the patient safety situation. This person needs to say in a firm, clear and respectful manner: “STOP, I have a patient safety concern.” Staff are to assertively voice concern at least two times to ensure the request has been heard. If there is noncompliance to respond to this time out, the Chain of Command process is invoked.

Success stories An elderly patient undergoing repair of a hip fracture was prepped for a right-sided procedure, consistent with the consent, history and physical, and a consultation report. During the time out, the surgical team determined that the patient had a left hip fracture, which was then confirmed by x-ray. The procedure was performed on the correct side. Wrong knee was marked in pre-procedure area. Verification of the site marking against source documents uncovered the discrepancy and correct site was marked and surgery completed.

Take-Home Points A Time Out must be completed prior to any invasive procedure across the organization for every patient, every time. All Time Outs must be completed following the 5 key steps in the Time Out process. If there are any discrepancies during the Time Out or a step is not completed, members of the team will “Stop the Line” until resolution and agreement by the team. Staff and physicians will be supported by administration in “Stopping the Line.”