Time Calibration Tests Results using a waveform template Cross-talk measurements Stub asymmetry results Kalle Sulanke David Hardtke Bob Stokstad.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality control tools
Advertisements

Three Steps To Graphical Analysis Graphs are one of the tools of the trade for Physicists. There are three basic things you can do with a graph. 1. You.
Fill in missing numbers or operations
LE FONTANE DELLACQUANUOVA Assonometria monometrica in scala 1:25.
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Bob MichaelsParity Collab. Mtg. May 17, `07 Integrating Compton DAQ and Analysis Bob Michaels with Reminder about Nov 2006 Results Specification of new.
Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) 9th Designs Liaison Meeting – 7 October 2010 – Item No. 4.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
XFEL 2D Pixel Clock and Control System Train Builder Meeting, DESY 18 February 2010 Martin Postranecky, Matt Warren, Matthew Wing.
Objectives Uncertainty analysis Quality control Regression analysis.
Object Recognition Using Locality-Sensitive Hashing of Shape Contexts Andrea Frome, Jitendra Malik Presented by Ilias Apostolopoulos.
LaB6 Scanning Electron Source
Chapter 4: Basic Estimation Techniques
Instrumentation - Results from first season and plan for 2005 A. Karle Iceube Collabration meeting Berkeley March 19, 2005.
1 Electronics Simulation in the Photon Transport Monte Carlo Preamp model Receiver/discriminator circuit CAFÉ driver circuit model Examples Summary January.
Stimulus and Response. Simple Stimulus Verifying the Output Self-Checking Testbenches Complex Stimulus Complex Response Predicting the Output.
Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion
1 OTDR Studies First look with SM OTDR failed: not enough sensitivity to see RBS signal. Nice clear signals visible with MM OTDR (on free loan until 11/05/07).
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Summary Statistics When analysing practical sets of data, it is useful to be able to define a small number of values that summarise the main features present.
Number bonds to 10,
QR026 High Sensitivity VME Tuner Performance Data
CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting July 18, 2007.
1 Lab Equipment. 2 TopicSlides DC Power Supply3-4 Digital Multimeter5-8 Function Generator9-12 Scope – basic controls13-20 Scope – cursors21-24 Scope.
Master Clock for IceCube October 21, 2003 Contributors: Jerry Przybylski, Kalle Sulanke, Dave Nygren, Chuck McParland, Bob Stokstad Lawrence Berkeley National.
Timing calibration using WR P.Kooijman. Fibre network Had a PRR of the network Comments reasonably positive Complicated system Build a full testbench.
SJD/TAB1 EVLA Fiber Selection Critical Design Review December 5, 2001.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
AIDA design review Davide Braga Steve Thomas ASIC Design Group 9 June 2009.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
TDS8000 and TDR Considerations to Help Solve Signal Integrity Issues.
How to count PMT pulses Victor Kornilov Sternberg astronomical institute I count photons 25 years.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Design studies of a low power serial data link for a possible upgrade of the CMS pixel detector Beat Meier, Paul Scherrer Institut PSI TWEPP 2008.
David M. Webber University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign For the MuLan Collaboration A new determination of the positive muon lifetime to part per million.
25th June, 2003CMS Ecal MGPA first results1 MGPA first results testing begun 29 th May on bare die (packaging still underway) two chips looked at so far.
DAQ Hardware status - overview R. Stokstad DOM Main Board –Schedule (Minor) –Design (Przybylski) –Firmware (Stezelberger) –Testing (Goldschmidt) DOR Board.
Velleman Oscilloscope: Windows 7 by Mr. David Fritz.
Attenuation measurement with all 4 frozen-in SPATS strings Justin Vandenbroucke Freija Descamps IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Utrecht, Netherlands September.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Calibration summary Nov-Dec 09 R Apsimon. 10 Nov 09 Note, the power rail on the FONT5 board wasn’t working properly and so there is no good quality information.
5/9/03Andrei Sukhanov. Phobos BWMeeting1 Andrei Sukhanov – measurements, analysis Ioury Sedykh – software, calculations Piotr Kulinich – measurements,
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Jitter Monitor – Overview and Status Report Glenn Christian, Alexander Kalinin 30 May 2005.
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
DATA COMMUNICATION Lecture-28. Recap of Lecture 27  Frequency Ranges  Terrestrial Microwave Communication  Satellite Communication  Cellular Telephony.
Crashcourse Oscilloscope and Logic Analyzer By Christoph Zimmermann.
Improving IEEE 1588 synchronization accuracy in 1000BASE-T systems
A systematic study of cross-talk limitations in RPC timing
Time resolution measurement with Madison test-DAQ
Telecommunications Engineering Topic 2: Modulation and FDMA
String-21 Flasher Analysis
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
BESIII EMC electronics
Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Imperial laser system and analysis
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Presentation transcript:

Time Calibration Tests Results using a waveform template Cross-talk measurements Stub asymmetry results Kalle Sulanke David Hardtke Bob Stokstad

DOR DOM

Scope at DOR Scope at DOM

One-way time = 1/2 round trip time ONLY IF Symmetry in pulse generation and transmission Signal processing same at both ends Golden Rule of Time Calibration

DOR DOM DOR - DOM testDOR - DOR test DOR-DOR has same clock for transmitting and receiving DOR-DOM Asymmetry Test

V t t= V/( V/ t) Clock period 50 ns Time resolution < 5 ns Rise time ~400 ns -> linear algorithm should be OK

DOR-DOR shifted by one clock tick = 50 ns

V t (ns) t av

Average asymmetry = -1.3 ns RMS asymmetry = 1.1 ns DOR - DOR test DOR

DOR Card Av. Asymm RMS asymm DOM A -1.3 ns 1.1 ns DOM B -1.2 ns 1.1 ns DOR Card Test of Two DOM Configuration DOM A = 20 cm stub DOM B = 40 cm cable DOR DOM A DOM B Runs A_02_04N B_02_04N

Timing Waveform Analysis To get roundtrip time, need to analyze waveform: –Template method -- compare two waveforms and calculate time shift –Fitting method -- Fit each waveform with function Failed fit functions -- Error Function, Gaussians, Polynomials Best fit functions: DOM A_13_188

Waveform Analysis (cont.) Linear fit over limited range, calculate crossing point with pedestal Fit range

Round-Trip times using three methods Waveform comparison rms = 0.9 ns Linear fit rms = 3.9 ns Complicated fit rms = 7.2 ns Note: absolute scale on x-axis not adjusted properly. OK for residuals, however.

Using measured waveform as template appears promising. Simple, fast, accurate. Robust? (likely) Candidate for use in ice. Waveform Analysis Summary

DOR - DOM waveforms

Better symmetry after some component adjustments

DOR - DOM typical results: Round trip time rms ~ 1 ns for 3.4 km cable in lab using template Boards otherwise "quiet" No transmission of data in other twisted pair.

Cross-talk studies DOR - DOM 3.4 km Ericsson quad on spool Measure round trip rms deviation with and without data xmission at (1 Mbit/s) in other twisted pair

Cross-talk measurement results round trip residual (rms ns) DOM A DOM B Data transmission off to Ericsson quad Data transmission on in Ericsson quad Runs X01_A,B NOX01_A,B Does Cross-talk occur in quad or on DOR card?

Cross-talk measurement results, cont. round trip residual (rms ns) DOM A DOM B Data transmission on to another quad Data transmission on in Ericsson quad Runs X01_A,B X03_A,B => Most Cross-talk occurs in quad

Cable cross-talk rms =4.4 nsNo cable cross-talk rms =1.5 ns Round Trip Time Residuals

Cross-talk, cont. Look at pedestal region: Communications OFF Communications ON

Cross-talk Calculate rms of signal in baseline region: Data transmission in another cable => Most cross talk is in cable

Cross-talk, cont. Try to reduce cross talk by using trapezoidal communications pulse Result rms DOM Arms DOM B 4.4 ns 6.0 ns => No Help Runs X05_A,B_trap

Timing error budget for clock calibration is 5 ns total -including frequency, offset, asymmetry DOM clock calibration randomsystematic quad sum frequency(sqrt 2 * intrinsic)2.82 clock drift1 offset(1/2 up-down asymmetry, component variations) 4 DOM clock calibration subtotal Conclude need to shut down data transmission during RAPCAL in order to meet timing requirement, given cross- talk levels in Ericsson quad. Synchronized shutdown of communications for calibration is now the planned operating mode.

Cable Stub Tests No Stub Configurations DOR DOMaDOMb 15 cm terminated unterminated 3.4 km cable end DOR DOMbDOMa 15 cm1750 cm3.4 km 12 DOR, DOMa, and DOMb are actually one DOR card

Cable Stub Tests Stub Configuration DOR DOMb DOMa 130 cm 1750 cm3.4 km 3

Stub test results (preliminary) DOMaDOMb asym rms (NB 1 clock tick = 50 ns. Above absolute asymmetry is due to systematic logic error and is < 1ns.) DOR card has single clock for all 3 channels => Can measure up - down asymmetry Use centroid of positive portion of pulse These results suggest that 1.3 m cable stub does not introduce an asymmetry with measurable effect on time calibration