Benchmarking of SEPA AREAs through the results of the Feasibility Studies Responsible partner: CTNC 06/12/2018 Benchmarking of SEPA areas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
SPO UVER 5-11 November 2007 Carlo Amati.
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Organizational Design, Diagnosis, and Development Session 11 Organizational Diagnosis, I.
Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Focus on performance incentives Thomas Tandskov Dissing Senior Adviser Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs Danish.
A DAPTIVE MANAGEMENT: S TRATEGIES FOR COPING WITH CHANGE AND UNCERTAINTY J. BRIAN NYBERG FRST 532 COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEM, GLOBAL CHANGE SCIENCE AND ECOLOGICAL.
CP methodology adapted to Stockholm Convention Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.C United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology.
Customer Focus Module Preview
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Qatar Planning Council 1 Best Statistical Information to Support Qatar’s Progress Statistical Capacity Building for Information Society in Qatar.
A Comparative Analysis of the Social Dimension surrounding the project partners Hannah Leichsenring Ghent | 12. November 2013.
The Statistical Metadata System: its role in a statistical organization Jana Meliskova Joint UNECE / Eurostat / OECD Work Session on Statistical Metadata.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF. Work Package 4 & Methodology for Open Living Lab O4.1.7 Budapest,
LAA Judging Criteria & Process 2015
Program Evaluation & Research In Service-Learning Service-Learning Mini-Institute Lynn E. Pelco, Ph.D. Division of Community Engagement.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
COGITA is made possible by Bologna, 23 October 2014 European Public Policies on CSR: The perceptions SMEs Eleni Apospori, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of.
HyRaMP Work Plan 2008/2009 Dr. Andreas Ziolek 1 st HyRaMP General Assembly Brussels, October 15, 2008.
Private Client Group Information Technology Strategy Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Disability Rights Promotion International- Canada Monitoring.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Applied Research.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
11/22/ The ALBI model Lucca, Knowledge seminar January 21st, 2014 Provincia di Lucca.
ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 The Region’s Plan Policy Development.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Behavior Based Energy Efficiency (BBEE) October 2011.
UNSD Recent international developments in Energy Statistics.
33 3. IS Planning Issues Scope of IS planning Barriers in IS planning Overview of IS planning Inputs to IS planning Process of IS planning Outputs from.
5t5t Domain Governance Ron Eckoff. BIO Ron Eckoff.
© 2007 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Walker: Introduction to Hospitality Management, 2 nd edition Chapter 15 Planning.
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Department of Water Affairs.
Consulting LAB Anticipating, sustaining and monitoring the change is an highly demanding activity for the whole organization.
(I)WRM indicators A GWP PERSPECTIVE Water Country Briefs Project Diagnostic Workshop, Geneva, December 2010 Mike Muller : GWP-TEC.
Ricardo Furman Senior Evaluation Officer- Geneva EIA Evaluation and Impact Assessment Section International Programme for the Elimination of Child Labour.
Terms of Reference for RCs Training of Trainers Rome, 31 May – 4 June 2010.
Module 2 National IEA Process Design and Organization Stakeholder’s consultative workshop/ Training on Integrated assessments methodology ECONOMIC VALUATION.
Energetická náročnost budov
Building an ENI CBC project
Quality Assurance MENTEP Yves Beernaert, Educonsult
The Impact of Accountable Care Organizations in Radiology
Strategic Initiative for Resource Efficient Biomass Policies
REDD+ Methodology: Issues Coming Out from Country Presentations
Marketing & Innovation
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
LAA Judging Criteria & Process
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regeneration
Monitoring and Evaluation
Financial Analysis.
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
Modernization Maturity Model and Roadmap
C H A P T E R C H A P T E R Planning 15.
MSFD Socio-economics, OSPAR approaches
What defines an international statistical standard and other types of international statistical publications in economic statistics? Second Meeting of.
Monitoring & Reporting 2019
LAA Judging Criteria & Process
SEPA feasibility study in the Central-Transdanubian Region
Principles Of Management-II
Mumtaz Ali Rajput +92 – SOFTWARE PROJECTMANAGMENT– WEEK 4 Mumtaz Ali Rajput +92 – 301-
Ohio SAMHSA Grantee Meeting
We Need Your Feedback Please complete your learning evaluations
(System Development Life Cycle)
Ricardo Furman Senior Evaluation Officer- Geneva
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
Dramatic reduction of forest cover in Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
Gio.net First Proposal to discuss during Barcelona Meeting
SFIC and the international dimension of the ERA Framework Riitta Mustonen – SFIC Chair / Academy of Finland NORDFORSK SEMINAR 28/2/2012.
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking of SEPA AREAs through the results of the Feasibility Studies Responsible partner: CTNC 06/12/2018 Benchmarking of SEPA areas

Benchmarking of SEPA areas Milestones Strategy Approach: functional benchmarking mixed with benchlearning Goal: better knowledge and implementation of internal operation Definition of the fields of investigation Data collection Inputs from feasibility studies Data processing Interpretation Benchamarking report following an agreed methodology Continuous coordination with the partners if needed Feedback key success factors eliminate development barriers define valuable and integrated approaches for all SEPA AREAs 06/12/2018 Benchmarking of SEPA areas

Main fields of investigation Systematic comparison and evaluation Economic and social issues Environmental issues Financial issues Policy relations Organizational aspects Services Success factors – Problems and barriers – Methods – Planning and implementation strategies – Made and needed steps – impact to the whole area 06/12/2018 Benchmarking of SEPA areas

Benchmarking of SEPA areas Expected results Giving valuable inputs for all SEPA areas Concrete areas of intervention Giving the opportunity to integrate the results Supporting each other to implement good practices Supporting to develop joint methodology and scouting of investors 06/12/2018 Benchmarking of SEPA areas

Benchmarking of SEPA areas Processes (need to be shceduled) FSs Template for Benchmarking report Inputs Data processing Interpretation Implementation Draft report Final report Outputs Feedback to FSs 06/12/2018 Benchmarking of SEPA areas