1 P. Lecoq CERN April 2011 Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Factors influencing time resolution in scintillators Paul Lecoq CERN,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Advertisements

New developments of Silicon Photomultipliers (for PET systems)
1 A first design of the PEP-N Calorimeter A first design of the PEP-N Calorimeter Presented by P. Patteri Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INFN for PEP-N.
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
POLARIMETRY of MeV Photons and Positrons Overview Beam Characterization – undulator photons – positrons Basics of the Transmission Method – for photon.
Compton Photon Calorimeter Gregg Franklin, B. Quinn Carnegie Mellon Design Considerations Light Yield and Photoelectrons Detector Geometry, EGS Simulations,
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
CALENDAR.
0 - 0.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, fractions, decimals, proportion & probability.
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? Decimal Edition Question 1.
Liverpool Group presentation 22/07/2009
What are PET basics?.
Geant 4 simulation of the DEPFET beam test Daniel Scheirich, Peter Kodyš, Zdeněk Doležal, Pavel Řezníček Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University,
MPPC Nicola D’Ascenzo, Erika Garutti, Martin Göttlich
Scintillator Tile Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype (analog or semidigital) M.Danilov ITEP(Moscow) CALICE Collaboration LCWS04, Paris.
Mental Math Math Team Skills Test 20-Question Sample.
1 Electronics Simulation in the Photon Transport Monte Carlo Preamp model Receiver/discriminator circuit CAFÉ driver circuit model Examples Summary January.
VOORBLAD.
WP2 summary of activities at Oxford Dr B Camanzi On behalf of the University of Oxford Group.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Sets Sets © 2005 Richard A. Medeiros next Patterns.
23-8 3x6 Double it Take Away 6 Share By 9 Double it +10 Halve it Beginner Start Answer Intermediate 70 50% of this ÷7÷7 x8 Double it Start Answer.
Before Between After.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
2 x0 0 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!. 2 x1 2 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
Measurements of Angular and Energy Distributions of Prompt Neutron Emission from Thermal Induced Fission Vorobyev A.S., Shcherbakov O.A., Gagarski A.M.,
Graeme Henchel Multiples Graeme Henchel
0 x x2 0 0 x1 0 0 x3 0 1 x7 7 2 x0 0 9 x0 0.
7x7=.
1 Continuous Scintillator Slab with Microchannel Plate PMT for PET Heejong Kim 1, Chien-Min Kao 1, Chin-Tu Chen 1, Jean-Francois Genat 2, Fukun Tang 2,
PET Design: Simulation Studies using GEANT4 and GATE - Status Report - Martin Göttlich DESY.
S. Seifert, H.T. van Dam, D.R. Schaart
1 A Design of PET detector using Microchannel Plate PMT with Transmission Line Readout Heejong Kim 1, Chien-Min Kao 1, Chin-Tu Chen 1, Jean-Francois Genat.
8/18/2015G.A. Fornaro Characterization of diffractive optical elements for improving the performance of an endoscopic TOF- PET detector head Student: G.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
P. Lecoq CERN 1 October 2012 NSS-MIC Annaheim, October 30th, 2012 How Photonic Crystals can improve scintillator timing resolution Paul Lecoq, E. Auffray,
Department of Radiology UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 1 Investigation of LaBr 3 Detector Timing Resolution A.Kuhn 1, S. Surti 1, K.S. Shah 2, and J.S. Karp.
P. Lecoq CERN 1 February 2012 ICTR-PHE 2012, Geneva, February 27-March 2, 2012 Novel multimodal endoscopic probes for simultaneous PET/ultrasound imaging.
P. Lecoq CERN 1 March 2014 Fast timing workshop, Clermont Fd, March 12-14, 2014 Ultimate Time Resolution in Scintillator-based detectors for Calorimetry.
Optimization of Detectors for Time of Flight PET Marek Moszyński, Tomasz Szczęśniak, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Increase in Photon Collection from a YAP:Ce Matrix Coupled to Wave Lenght Shifting Fibres N. Belcari a, A. Del Guerra a, A. Vaiano a, C. Damiani b, G.
1 Geant4 Simulation :MCP PET 4’’(102mm) Scintillator ( LSO) 4’’(102mm) 10mm Glass( Borosilicate) PhotocathodeI(Carbon) Space(Vacuum) MCP(Alumina) Space(Vacumm)
P. Lecoq CERN 1 November 2010 Workshop on Timing Detectors - Cracow 2010 Time of Flight: the scintillator perspective Paul Lecoq CERN, Geneva.
P. Lecoq CERN February SiPM Workshop, CERN, February, 2011 New Approaches in Scintillation Detectors in the Context of HEP Calorimetry and.
Peter Dendooven LaBr 3 and LYSO monolithic crystals coupled to photosensor arrays for TOF-PET Physics for Health in Europe Workshop February 2-4, 2010,
Potential Advantages of Digitally Sampling Scintillation Pulses in Time Determination in PET Q. Xie 1,2, C.-M. Kao 1, X. Wang 2, N. Guo 2, C. Zhu 2, H.
Fondazione Bruno Kessler Centre for Materials and Microsystems.
P. Lecoq CERN2 February ENVISION WP2 Meeting CERN Group contribution to ENVISION WP2 Paul Lecoq CERN, Geneva.
MCP PET Simulation (7) – Pixelated X-tal
md-NUV PET project meeting
Status Report on MCP PET Simulation
Presentation transcript:

1 P. Lecoq CERN April 2011 Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Factors influencing time resolution in scintillators Paul Lecoq CERN, Geneva

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Where is the limit? Philips and Siemens TOF PET achieve –550 to 650ps timing resolution –About 9cm localization along the LOR Can we approach the limit of 100ps (1.5cm)? Can scintillators satisfy this goal?

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Development of new biomarkers First clinical targets: pancreatic/prostatic cancer Tool: dual modality PET-US endoscopic probe –Spatial resolution: 1mm –Timing resolution: 200ps –High sensitivity to detect 1mm tumor in a few mn –Energy resolution: discriminate Compton events

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 For the scintillator the important parameters are –Time structure of the pulse –Light yield –Light transport affecting pulse shape, photon statistics and LY Timing parameters decay time of the fast component Photodetector excess noise factor number of photoelectrons generated by the fast component General assumption, based on Hyman theory

5 P. Lecoq CERN April 2011 Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 d = 40 ns N phe d = 40 ns N phe Statistical limit on timing resolution LSO N phe =2200 W(Q,t) is the time interval distribution between photoelectrons = the probability density that the interval between event Q-1 and event Q is t = time resolution when the signal is triggered on the Q th photoelectron

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Light generation Rare Earth 4f 5d

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Factors influencing the scintillation decay time Three important aspects Dipole and spin allowed transitions Short wavelength of emission High refractive index

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Light Transport –-49° < < 49° Fast forward detection 17.2% –131° < < 229° Delayed back detection 17.2% –57° < Fast escape on the sides 54.5% –49° < < 57° and 123° < < 131° infinite bouncing 11.1% For a 2x2x20 mm 3 LSO crystal Maximum time spread related to difference in travel path is 424 ps peak to peak 162 ps FWHM

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 W(Q,t) is the time interval distribution between photoelectrons = the probability density that the interval between event Q-1 and event Q is t = time resolution when the signal is triggered on the Q th photoelectron Rise time is as important as decay time Rise time

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Time resolution with rise time The intensity of light signal of a scintillating crystal can be described by the Shao Formula Coincidence time resolution CTR : Arrival time of first photon : The number of photo-electrons firing the photo-detector N(t) between 0 and t after simplifications is given by :

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Photon counting approach LYSO, 2200pe detected, d =40ns r =0ns r =0.2ns r =0.5ns r =1ns

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Variation of CTR for different crystals with different rise times

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Crystal specifications for 200ps CTR Impossible for LuAG:Ce

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Coincidence SiPM-SiPM

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 FWHM in coincidence Hama. 25μ FWHM in coincidence Hama. 50μ FWHM in coincidence Hama. 100μ Fill Factor:30.8%61.5%78.5% Number of Pixels: Best Settings:73V Bias 150mV Th. 72.4V Bias 100mV Th. 70.3V Bias 300mV Th. LSO with LSO 2x2x10mm 3 : 340±9ps220±4ps280±9ps LFS 3x3x15mm 3 : 429±10ps285±8ps340±3.2ps LuAG:Pr with LuAG:Pr 2x2x8mm 3 : 1061±40 ps672±30 ps826±40 ps LuAG:Ce with LuAG:Ce 2x2x8mm 3 : 1534±50 ps872±50 ps1176±50ps LYSO with LYSO 2x2x8mm 3 : 282±9ps LYSO with LYSO 0.75x0.75x10mm 3 : 360±22ps208±20ps Summary of results

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Reproducibility LSO vs LSO SiPM Hamamatsu 50 m

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 CrystalsNbre pe firing SiPM CTR Measured SiPM 25μm Predicted with Shao formula LSO 2x2x10mm ps330ps LYSO 0.75x0.75x10mm ps336ps LuAG:Ce 2x2x8mm ps1492 ps (decay 60ns) 1553ps (decay 65ns) LuAG:Pr 2x2x8mm ps842ps (rise time 200ps) 1031 ps (risetime 300ps) Comparison between predictions & experimental results

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011Conclusions Timing resolution improves with lower threshold Ultimate resolution implies single photon counting High light yield is mandatory –100000ph/MeV achievable with scintillators Short decay time –15-20ns is the limit for bright scintillators (LaBr 3 ) –1ns achievable but with poor LY Crossluminescent materials Severely quenched self-activated scintillators SHORT RISE TIME –Difficult to break the barrier of 100ps

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Our Team CERN –Etiennette Auffray –Stefan Gundacker –Hartmut Hillemanns –Pierre Jarron –Arno Knapitsch –Paul Lecoq –Tom Meyer –Kristof Pauwels –François Powolny Nanotechnology Institute, Lyon –Jean-Louis Leclercq –Xavier Letartre –Christian Seassal

P. Lecoq CERN April Workshop on Timing Detectors – Chicago 28-29April 2011 Light output: LYSO example Statistics on about 1000 LYSO pixels 2x2x20mm 3 –produced by CPI –for the ClearPEM-Sonic project (CERIMED) Mean value = ph/MeV For 511 KeV and 25%QE: 2378 phe Assuming ENF= 1.1 Nphe/ENF 2200 phe