Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 
Advertisements

Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
A Conserved Oligomerization Domain in Drosophila Bazooka/PAR-3 Is Important for Apical Localization and Epithelial Polarity  Richard Benton, Daniel St.
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Brian S. Robinson, Juang Huang, Yang Hong, Kenneth H. Moberg 
David Bilder, Saori L. Haigo  Developmental Cell 
Stratum, a Homolog of the Human GEF Mss4, Partnered with Rab8, Controls the Basal Restriction of Basement Membrane Proteins in Epithelial Cells  Olivier.
Sokol V. Todi, Josef D. Franke, Daniel P. Kiehart, Daniel F. Eberl 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
David Bilder, Saori L. Haigo  Developmental Cell 
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Dcr-1 Maintains Drosophila Ovarian Stem Cells
Drosophila PAR-1 and Inhibit Bazooka/PAR-3 to Establish Complementary Cortical Domains in Polarized Cells  Richard Benton, Daniel St Johnston 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Patronin/Shot Cortical Foci Assemble the Noncentrosomal Microtubule Array that Specifies the Drosophila Anterior-Posterior Axis  Dmitry Nashchekin, Artur Ribeiro.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (June 2006)
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Vitaly Zimyanin, Nick Lowe, Daniel St Johnston  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Naoyuki Fuse, Kanako Hisata, Alisa L. Katzen, Fumio Matsuzaki 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Todd Nystul, Allan Spradling  Cell Stem Cell 
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
APKC Controls Microtubule Organization to Balance Adherens Junction Symmetry and Planar Polarity during Development  Tony J.C. Harris, Mark Peifer  Developmental.
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (April 2006)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Cell Competition Drives the Formation of Metastatic Tumors in a Drosophila Model of Epithelial Tumor Formation  Teresa Eichenlaub, Stephen M. Cohen, Héctor.
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 14, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
ASPP2 Regulates Epithelial Cell Polarity through the PAR Complex
Drosophila oogenesis Current Biology
Aeri Cho, Masato Kato, Tess Whitwam, Ji Hoon Kim, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Regulation of Invasive Cell Behavior by Taiman, a Drosophila Protein Related to AIB1, a Steroid Receptor Coactivator Amplified in Breast Cancer  Jianwu.
The Drosophila Homolog of C
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Oocyte polarity is disrupted in the presence of FP41 mutant PFCs
Drosophila embryonic hemocytes
The receptor tyrosine phosphatase Dlar and integrins organize actin filaments in the Drosophila follicular epithelium  Jack Bateman, R.Srekantha Reddy,
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
Dan T. Bergstralh, Holly E. Lovegrove, Daniel St Johnston 
The Cytoplasmic Dynein and Kinesin Motors Have Interdependent Roles in Patterning the Drosophila Oocyte  Jason E Duncan, Rahul Warrior  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Presentation transcript:

The Role of the Actomyosin Cytoskeleton in Coordination of Tissue Growth during Drosophila Oogenesis  Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 15, Pages 1349-1355 (August 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.067 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Oogenesis and Follicle Cell Development Egg chambers are oriented such that anterior is to the left and posterior is to the right. (A) Schemes depict egg-chamber development and a polarized follicle cell. (B) Stage 3 egg chamber stained for actin (red) and pRMLC (green). The yellow overlap at the apical site of the follicular epithelium indicates the formation of the apical restriction of myosin activity. (C) Two egg chambers stained for the lateral marker FasIII (red) and pRMLC (green). Vasa (blue) highlights the germline cyst. (D) Stage 6 egg chamber stained for pRMLC and Arm to mark the adherence junctions. The shape of the cyst has changed from round to ellipsoid. (E–G) pRMLC localization in a stage 10a egg chamber. A sagittal section through three follicle cells is shown (E). Myosin activity at the basal and apical cortex of the follicular epithelium is visible. Confocal sections at the apical and basal cortex of the follicular epithelium reveal different patterns of Myosin activity (F and G). Current Biology 2007 17, 1349-1355DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.067) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 pRMLC Localization in Mutants Affecting Apical Polarity, and Coprecipitation of Baz and pRMLC (A–F) Stage 4/5 egg chambers. A wild-type egg chamber shows apical restriction of pRMLC (green) (A). Egg chambers with follicle cell clones homozygous mutant for the indicated genes are shown (B–F). Clones are marked by the absence of either green fluorescent protein (GFP) (C and E) or β-Galactosidase (B, D, and F) shown in blue. In all egg chambers, the clones cover the whole follicular epithelium, with the exception of (D). Follicle cell clones mutant for a null allele of arm are shown in (B). Only very few large clones were obtained, all of which strongly affected the morphology of the epithelium. Nevertheless, pRMLC is restricted apically. In (C) and (F), arrowheads point to ectopic myosin activity at the basal cortex. Arrows indicate the absence of apical pRMLC in crb mutants. An egg chamber with two large par-6 clones showing complete absence of pRMLC at the apical cortex is shown in (D). The few wild-type cells (blue) retain apical myosin activity. (G) Immunoprecipitation of Baz from an ovarian extract. The western blot was incubated with the indicated antibodies, revealing that aPKC and pRMLC precipitate with Baz (left half). pRMLC, aPKC, and Baz did not bind to protein A agarose in the control experiment (right half). Experiments in which an antibody against the transcription factor Twist was used as a control gave the same result. The pRMLC signal is not visible in the input lane because of the short exposure time of the film shown. Current Biology 2007 17, 1349-1355DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.067) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Morphological Defects in Egg Chambers with Homozygous sqh and rok Follicle Cell Clones Stainings and genotypes of clones are indicated. (A) Clones in the follicular epithelium of stage 5/6 egg chambers. Clones are marked by the absence of green in the left column. The right column shows actin cortex stained with phalloidin alone. The arrow marks an increased nucleus in a sqh mutant clone, indicating a failure in cytokinesis. The lower two panels compare sqh and dia clones, both spanning three cells with fused nuclei. Note that in the sqh clone, the central epithelial cell collapses (arrowheads), and the cyst bulges outward. This is in contrast to the dia clone, in which the central cell maintains its rectangular (arrowheads) shape and the cyst does not extrude significantly. (B) Stage 7 egg chamber with a rok mutant follicle cell clone. The clone is marked by the absence of β-gal (red) in the nuclei. Coinciding with the clone border, pRMLC levels drop. The inset shows the pRMLC channel alone. (C) sqh mutant cells are stretched but retain aPKC localization at the apical membrane. Clones are marked by the absence of green. (D) Follicle cell clones in a stage 8 (up) and stage 9 (down) egg chambers mutant for sqh and dia. Clones are marked by the absence of green. The two lower pictures show the same egg chamber. Arrows mark mutant cells with increased nuclei due to cytokinesis defects, and arrowheads point toward wild-type nuclei. (E) Lateral Dlg localization in the mutant cells (arrowheads) indicates the presence of septate junctions in a sqh mutant clone of a stage 6 egg chamber. Note the outward bulging of the cyst in regions where follicle cells are mutant. (F) Wild-type stage 6 egg chamber showing a typical ellipsoid shape. (G) Rupture of the follicular epithelium in a sqh mutant clone in a stage 8 egg chamber. (H) Confocal section at the level of the adherence junctions of a stage 9 egg chamber. rok mutant cells stretch, whereas neighboring wild-type cells retain a normal shape. (I) Stage 5/6 egg chamber with one large anteriorly located and two small posteriorly located rok mutant clones. Cells in the large clone are flat, whereas cells in small clones retain cuboidal shape to some extent. Note the irregular shape of the germline cyst and the outward bulging of the cyst (arrows). Current Biology 2007 17, 1349-1355DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.067) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Block of Cyst Growth Suppresses Morphological Defects of sqh Clones Ovarioles are stained as indicated. Clones are marked by the absence of GFP. (A) sqh clones in a wild-type background result in epithelial deformation and outward bulging of the cyst (arrows). Note the size increase of egg chambers between stages 2 and 5. (B) sqh clones in an ovoD1 mutant background retain rectangular shape, and the cyst does not bulge outwards. Note that stage 5 and stage 6 egg chambers have the same size, indicating growth arrest. (C) Magnification of the clones shown in (A) (up) and (C) (down). Arrows compare the apical basal extent of sqh mutant and wild-type follicle cells. Current Biology 2007 17, 1349-1355DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.067) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions