© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Mathematics and Science
Advertisements

Educationeducation Improving Scottish Stirling Mathematics Conference.
Action Research Project By Sohayla M. Lajevardi 2013.
Welcome to Algebra for All Year 2 October 29, 2010.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
LOGO Kwangho Lee Korean Elementary School Teachers’ Mathematical Textbook Use Korea National University of Education.
MH502: Developing Mathematical Proficiency, Geometry and Measurement, K-5 Seminar 1 September 28, 2010.
Adolescent Literacy Cadre February 2, 2010 Jane Awtry & Marnie Leiferman AEA 13 Reading Consultants.
Planning for Instruction Chapter 6 NC Teaching Standard IV.
SE 521 Dr. Lola Taylor Unit one. INTRODUCTION This week's seminar will focus on getting acquainted and understanding the expectations for the course.
Ayoub Kafyulilo DUCE Challenges and Opportunities of Integrating ICT in Education.
13 strategies to use Powerpoint to support active learning in classroom.
Welcome! Please arrange yourselves in groups of 6 so that group members represent: A mix of grade levels A mix of schools 1.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
Stage 1 – Desired Results Level I – Quarter 1 – Art History Established Goals Enduring Understanding: The Elements & Principles of Design are found throughout.
Table 3. Management of the Learning Process M. Haviz et al. Cooperative Learning Model on Developmental of Biology. American Journal of Educational Research,
Appendix 1. Mean and standard deviation of the study sample grades on a scale of Developmentally Appropriate Teaching Practices Eman Gheith et al. Correlation.
Table 3. shows the means, standard deviations, and the level of assessment for female teachers’ views about the causes of low achievement in Rhetoric Haifa.
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Table 1. Τhe grid analysis with conceptual categories and subcategories by NRC (2012) Tsetsos Stavros et al. The Scientific Practices on the Science’s.
A project is a set of series of tasks that need to be completed in order and in time to reach specific goals. A project is a temporary that means it has.
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Assessment of the model
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Model Types Instructional Decisions Associated Lesson Plans
Software Name (Function Type)
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
student achievement scores
Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions
Nilai rata-rata total validitas
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. Conceptual Framework Learning Outcomes
Table 3. Standardized Factor Loadings of EFA
Table 1. Summary of SETE Factors Considered in Previous Studies
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 1. Technological aspects of formation of teaching and research skills of students through orderly system of tasks # The purpose of the organization of students Activities of students Technological comment for a teacher 1. Determine the level of formed educational experience of students of mathematical concepts that will be studied according to the topic of the next lesson. Formulation of objectives and hypotheses of teaching and research tasks. A frontal survey is carried out. The responses are summarized. The misconceptions are identified. The stated purpose and the hypothesis of teaching and research tasks are adjusted. 2. Form the students' skills in planning, working out the stages of the teaching and research tasks. Independent reading and understanding the stages of implementation of teaching and research tasks. Attention is paid to the sequence of stages of implementation of teaching and research tasks. 3. Form students' attitudes towards mathematics as a tool for modeling and study of the world, discussing examples from the environment, which can be correlated with the geometric concepts under study. Students independently analyze images on the drawings. They summarize information and offer their own example that will continue series of drawings, given specified properties and attributes of the object corresponding images. A part of the problem, which concerns the choice of an example of the environment and its image, students perform at home as a part of homework. 4. Motivate the feasibility and importance of formation of the idea or concept, its role and place in the mathematical knowledge system. Students are introduced to the historical material about the origin of the term or concept. Students independently complete the task "Refresh the meaning of the text entitled" Historical origins of the term or concept". 5. Form the ability to argue logically and justify mathematical statements, apply mathematical methods in the process of learning and solving practical problems, use mathematical knowledge and skills while learning other subjects. Students perform tasks by modifying the shape of teaching activities in accordance with the type of a task. The teacher leads students to understand the nature of the geometric material and gives them an opportunity to move informing their teaching and research skills, changing the form of learning activities of students. The teacher determines the tasks that students perform at home and in the classroom. 6. Summarize and organize the material studied. Students complete the task independently, summing up digestible training information. The teacher checks the validity of the assignment. The formulated hypothesis of teaching and research tasks is checked. Golodiuk Larisa et al. On the Problem of Shaping Teaching and Research Skills of Mathematics Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 12B, 41-45. doi:10.12691/education-2-12B-8 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.