Klaczynski, P.A. (2001) Analytic and Heuristic Processing Influences on Adolescent Reasoning and Decision-Making. Child Development Proposes a two process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opener With the person seated next to you, tell me how your lives would be different if you did not have any parental oversight. Break it up into 3 time.
Advertisements

Information on how we can better understand and develop children! DRAW A PICTURE OF A PIG Theorists in Child Development.
Streissguth et al.(1994) Seattle Longitudinal study started in 1974 to examined long term effects of PAE At this point there was little evidence that alcohol.
Cognition. Questions Why do people make mistakes? Are intelligence tests biased?
Cognition Thoughts, Beliefs, and Attitudes. Moving from thoughts to behavior Concepts Propositions Behavior Mental Models.
Intelligence. Evolution of the Concept of Intelligence Chinese tests for civil service. Chinese tests for civil service. Galton (mid 1800s)—speed of sensory.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
Decision Making How do people make decisions? Are there differences between making simple decisions vs. complex ones?
Growth and Development
Stages of Adolescence By Katelyn Dibrell.
Leaving Home Trends, Traditions and Emergent Adulthood.
Reasoning and Judgment PSY 421 – Fall Overview Reasoning Judgment Heuristics Other Bias Effects.
Profiling: What is it? Notes and reflections on profiling and how it could be used in process mining.
What makes us intelligent Or Not so intelligent
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Community Learning and Development Managers Scotland
Scientific Method.
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
3 Research Design Formulation
Visiting human errors in IR systems from decision making perspective
PHL 320 STUDY Future Starts Here/phL320study.com
Intergenerational Transmission of Work Values: A Meta-Analytic Review Ekin Seçinti, Zeynep Cemalcılar, Nebi Sümer, Murat Kezer INTRODUCTION Recent statistics.
Psychological research methods task
Chapter 10 Causal Inference and Correlational Designs
… and you suck at making decisions
A1. Physical development Birth to infancy 0-2 years-old
A CULTURAL APPROACH TO CHILD DEVELOPMENT
Pavle Valerjev Marin Dujmović
Developmental Stages in Middle and Late Adolescence
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Correlations and Lines of Best Fit Scatter Plots
PHl 320 STUDY Experience Tradition / phl320study.com.
PSYCH 600Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
Strengths and Weaknesses
Direction: Students who take longer to run the sprint typically have shorter jumps. This means there is a negative association between sprint time and.
Warm-up Solve for segment WV. Solve for x..
Solve: 1. 4<
What makes us intelligent Or Not so intelligent
Growth and Development
Julia ELD & Sarah Jacklin
Cognition and mental abilities
Uses multiple sources to examine differences
What makes us intelligent Or Not so intelligent
کارگاه مقدماتی روش تحقیق انتظارات از فراگیران در پایان این مبحث
In pairs complete the Agony Aunt task
Adulthood and Aging Module 06.
Life Stages Learning Aim A Outcomes: Identify the life stages
What makes us intelligent Or Not so intelligent
MIS2502: Data Analytics Field Experiments and Natural Experiments
Program Evaluation, Archival Research, and Meta-Analytic Designs
Modules 25-28: Thinking, Language, and Intelligence
Emergency telephone in Russia is 112.
Task Dependency and the Role of Category Typicality and Metamemory in the Development of an Organizational Strategy. Marcus Hasselhorn; Child Development,
PSYC 2314 Lifespan Development
October
General Social Competence (18)
Steps in the Research Process
Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood and adolescent body-mass index, weight, and height from 1953 to 2015: an analysis of four longitudinal, observational,
7. Decision Making.
What makes us intelligent Or Not so intelligent
Chapter 12 Midlife Robin Lee, Middle Tennessee State University.
Module 2 Research Methods
Becoming a Helper Chapter 3.
Information, data, maps & photos explanation & analysis
Trimester 3 Week 2 Final Major Project.
Statistics 101 CORRELATION Section 3.2.
Chapter One Introduction.
In 2010, 10,208,400 children and youth called Canada home
7. Decision Making.
Presentation transcript:

Klaczynski, P.A. (2001) Analytic and Heuristic Processing Influences on Adolescent Reasoning and Decision-Making. Child Development Proposes a two process model for adolescent reasoning- analytic and heuristic Examines reasoning of early adolescents (~12 y.o.) and middle adolescents (~16 y.o.) Uses several tasks including- conditional reasoning, contingency detection, statistical reasoning problems, conjunction problems, ‘gambler’s fallacy’ problems, outcome bias problems, and a hindsight bias problem. Adult normative responses increase with age Results correlated in two clusters, analytic and heuristic Analytic and heuristic reasoning responses were generally not correlated Analytic reasoning seems to change more with age than heuristic reasoning Analytic reasoning is less broadly correlated for early adolescents than for late adolescents Strengths: Large number of tasks Adolescents of different ages Easily comparable to adult-normed data Weaknesses: Cross-sectional No measurement of problem solving time(analytic problem solving takes longer)