NWCCU update February 13, 2018.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.

Advertisements

Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government

NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.

LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.

College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.

Core Themes, Objectives, Achievement Indicators, Planning, & Effectiveness Carroll College February 19, 2010 NWCCU Plenary II Nominations for Best Picture.

SEM Planning Model.

Session 6 Common Problems Associated with Writing Learning Outcomes Comments from your reports.

The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII WEST OAHU REAFFIRMATION OF WASC ACCREDITATION The journey here and the path ahead April 17, 2015 Teri Cannon, Higher Education Consultant.

N “If you bring the appropriate people together in constructive ways with good information, they will create authentic visions and sustainable responses.

Msubillings.edu/futureu PROVOST FORUM October 15, 2012 msubillings.edu/futureu.

MEGAN CARLSON & BOGDAN HOANCA UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE Plenary II – Core Themes, Objectives, Achievement Indicators; Planning; Effectiveness.

Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.

2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,

Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,

MEGAN CARLSON & BOGDAN HOANCA UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE Plenary II – Core Themes, Objectives & Achievement Indicators.

Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.

2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,

Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.

Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.

Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.

FY15 Academic Affairs Budget Planning & Discussion UC Raccoon Mountain Room March 17, 2014.

Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.

The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment

SPRING 2014 CONVOCATION. AGENDA Organizational Chart Revisions and Reporting Structure Key Elements to Turn Planning Into Action Accreditation.

MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.

Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”

STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.

Self Study Workshop Plenary V Self Study Report Considerations Philosophy and Tone February 2, 2007 Sonya Christian.

SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.

Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.

Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)

Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.

Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,

Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.

Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.

A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.

Role of the Development Officers Curriculum for Excellence.

Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.

Accreditation, Strategic Planning, SPOL Implementation Sigrid Davison Associate Director, Analytics & Research, Office of Institutional Effectiveness Audrey.

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

Academic Program Review

Mission fulfillment: How do we know?

Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015

Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update

YEAR ONE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT

DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs

Institutional Effectiveness Plan

Core Themes, Objectives, and Achievement Indicators

Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect

IEPI Indicators Workshop

Budget & Planning Calendar.

27 February 2017 College Planning Council

Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009

Integrated Budget Process as Evidence of Institutional Effectiveness

HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW

College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process

Budget Development Process

Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015

Assessment Presentation

Accreditation Summary

A primer for the April 2019 visit

CORPORATE & ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE

Presented To: College Planning Council

Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW

AQIP Accreditation Systems Appraisal 2010

Overview of Program Review Categories

Accreditation follow-up report

Presented To: College Planning Council

Presentation transcript:

NWCCU update February 13, 2018

NWCCU 2016 Recommendation WOU Action taken and reported to NWCCU 1. Clarify Mission Strategic Planning Committee clarified mission 2. Define Mission Fulfillment WOU identified Objectives How their achievement results in mission fulfillment 3. Objectives & Indicators for Core Themes Core Themes (Student Success & Academic Excellence) Objectives, indicators & targets 4. Learning Outcomes Academic programs Identified course goals and program outcomes Aligned goals/outcomes with institutional learning outcomes Engage in assessment of program learning outcomes (quality assurance) Will engage in Academic Program Review (quality)

NWCCU 2016 Recommendation WOU Action taken and reported to NWCCU 5. Planning for Academic Technology University technology committee is in the process of being formed 6. Planning & Budget Units charged with developing action plans aligned with WOU SP University Budget committee established & reviewing budget requests 7. Assessment & Continuous Improvement Units charged with developing assessment plans; Academic programs continue assessment activities; University Council established to review priorities and progress, and track mission fulfillment

2016 Seven Year Report and Evaluation resulted in a Notice of Concern—the Notice of Concern has been removed Recommendation 1 – clarify mission -- is fulfilled. Recommendation 2 and 3 – define mission fulfillment, core themes, objectives and indicators – are in substantial compliance and fulfilled Recommendation 4, 6 & 7 – learning outcomes, planning & budget, assessment & continuous improvement – are in substantial compliance and in need of improvement

What’s to improve? We have appropriate systems in place. Now we need to consistently follow through on assessment, program review, aligned planning and budgeting, and continuous improvement in academic programs and across the university. We will submit a Mid-Cycle report in March 2019 that will Include Mission & Core Themes Demonstrate that our systems are being used and work Respond to Recommendation 5 (Academic Technology planning) We will submit a Year Seven report in 2023