Presentation to the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountability Reporting Webinar Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations & Federal NCLB Accountability Status, State Accountability & Assistance.
Advertisements

Superintendent Melinda J. Boone Alumni Auditorium, North High School October 21, 2013 Worcester Public Schools State of the Schools Address.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Sr. Associate Commissioner & Accountability Update Presentation to the AAAC October 29, 2014.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
2015 Accountability Reporting Presentation to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary & Secondary Education December 15, 2015 Update on Overall District.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
AAAC January 13, 2016 Best Western, Marlborough. Agenda  Welcome from Council Chair  ESE updates  2015 accountability reporting  Holyoke Public Schools.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Communication Webinar:
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
2016 Annual Dropout and Cohort Graduation Rates
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
2012 Accountability Determinations
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability & Assistance System
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
2016 Accountability Reporting
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS and 2017 Accountability Results
2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Worcester Accountability Results
Leader SLTs
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Student Assessment Updates
District and School Accountability System: Proposed Modifications
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Presentation transcript:

2017 Accountability Reporting Update on Overall District & School Accountability Determinations Presentation to the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education October 23, 2017

Goals of this presentation Provide an overview of 2017 district & school accountability determinations Share assessment & accountability results for Level 5 schools & districts

Current framework for district & school accountability & assistance Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Approved at the April 2017 BESE meeting Amendment to 603 CMR 2.00: Accountability & Assistance for School Districts & Schools Approved at the April 2017 BESE meeting Allows ESE to refrain from placing certain schools into Levels 1-3 at the beginning of the 2017-18 school year Applies to one year only Impacts schools serving grades 3-8 that administered Next-Generation MCAS tests in spring 2017 Does not impact high schools serving grades 9-12 that did not administer Next-Generation MCAS

Reporting details Schools & districts administering Next-Generation MCAS in grades 3-8 that have participation rates below 90% were placed into Level 3 Schools serving a combination of grades 3-8 & 9-12 that have persistently low graduation rates for any group were placed into Level 3 Level 4 or 5 schools or districts that did not exit maintained their level designation All other Next-Generation MCAS schools meeting participation & graduation rate requirements did not receive a school percentile, Progress & Performance Index (PPI), or accountability & assistance level (1-3) No new Level 4 or Level 5 schools were identified among schools serving grades 3-8 in 2017 Low-performing high schools were eligible for Level 4 & 5 designations 2017 assessment results will serve as the new baseline for target-setting in 2018 & beyond

Data reported in 2017 Schools administering legacy MCAS tests only (high schools) Schools administering Next- Generation MCAS tests in grades 3-8 Performance on all accountability indicators Progress & performance index (PPI) data School accountability percentiles Accountability & assistance levels (1-5) Schools identified for low or very low assessment participation Schools identified for persistently low graduation rates Next-Generation MCAS achievement percentiles (ELA & math, by grade & subgroup) Transitional student growth percentiles Accountability & assistance levels: No level Level 3 Very low assessment participation Persistently low graduation rates Current Level 4 & Level 5 schools

District Totals by Level 2016 & 2017 District levels District Totals by Level 2016 2017 # % Level 5 3 1% Level 4 7 2% -- Level 3 62 16% 13 3% Level 2 233 61% 20 5% Level 1 80 21% 16 4% No level 344 87% Total 385 100% 396 Insufficient Data1 22 8 1 Districts with insufficient data to be eligible for a level are those ending in grade PK, K, 1, or 2, very small districts, & districts without four full years of data.

2016 & 2017 School levels School Totals by Level 2016 2017 # % Level 5 4 0% Level 4 33 2% 31 Level 3 265 16% 81 5% Level 2 794 49% 129 8% Level 1 525 32% 70 4% No level -- 1324 81% Total 1621 100% 1639 Insufficient Data1 233 211 1 Schools & single-school districts with insufficient data to be eligible for a level are schools ending in grade PK, K, 1, or 2, very small schools, & schools without four full years of data.

Next-Generation MCAS schools by accountability level # % Next-Generation MCAS schools 1385 100.0 Insufficient data 10 0.7 No level 1324 95.6 Level 3 24 1.7 Very low assessment participation (less than 90%) 23 Persistently low graduation rates1 3 Level 4 22 1.6 Level 5 4 0.3 1“Persistently low” is defined as a 2016 four-year cohort graduation of less than 67 percent & 2015, 2014, & 2013 five-year cohort graduation rates of less than 70 percent.

Legacy MCAS schools by accountability level # % Legacy MCAS schools (high schools) 298 100.0 Insufficient data 33 11.1 Level 1 70 23.5 Level 2 129 43.3 Low assessment participation (90% - 95%) only 6 Level 3 57 19.1 Very low assessment participation (less than 90%) only 9 Persistently low graduation rates only 3 Level 4 3.0

2017 Commendation schools School Commendation Reason Abington High High progress & narrowing proficiency gaps Lynnfield High High achievement & high progress Swampscott High Narrowing proficiency gaps Westwood High Apponequet Regional High (Freetown-Lakeville) High progress Blackstone Valley RVT High Minuteman Regional High Heights Elementary (Sharon) 2017 National Blue Ribbon School - Gap Closing White Street (Springfield) Old Post Road (Walpole) 2017 National Blue Ribbon School - High Performing

Randolph Public Schools exited Level 4 2017 Level 4 decisions Randolph Public Schools exited Level 4 No new Level 4 schools Previously designated Level 4 schools remained in Level 4 (no exits)

Level 5 school update: Morgan Full Service Community (Holyoke) Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS Ach. %ile ELA 14 60 26 481.1 4 Math 11 56 33 478.0 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI Science 9 45 44.1 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 58.0 44.0 46.0 33.0 57.0 49.0 62.0 49.5 54.0 35.0 61.0 37.0

Level 5 school update: John Avery Parker (New Bedford) Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS Ach. %ile ELA 14 62 24 482.9 5 Math 16 57 27 481.3 6 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI Science 11 44 44.4 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 52.0 50.0 46.5 39.0 47.0 46.0 58.5 60.0 61.0 18.0 70.0 31.0

Level 5 school update: UP Academy Holland (Boston) Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS Ach. %ile ELA 1 21 51 26 485.7 8 Math 20 49 31 483.0 7 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI Science 2 10 46 41 52.0 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 49.0 37.5 35.0 47.0 67.0 55.0 60.5 38.0 46.0

Level 5 school update: Paul A. Dever (Boston) Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS Ach. %ile ELA 1 29 48 22 488.2 12 Math 5 40 16 494.4 30 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI Science 4 59 37 47.1 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 51.0 26.0 58.0 68.0 33.0 55.0 36.0 49.0 64.0 42.0 31.0 70.0

Level 5 district update: Lawrence Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS ELA (3-8) 2 24 51 23 487.3 Math (3-8) 3 30 49 19 491.0 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI ELA (HS) 29 47 16 9 90.9 Math (HS) 27 22 76.0 Science (all grades) 4 44 61.9 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ELA 43.0 47.0 52.0 49.0 Math 40.0 57.0 53.0 48.0

Level 5 district update: Southbridge Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS ELA (3-8) 2 19 47 32 481.9 Math (3-8) 1 18 34 480.9 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI ELA (HS) 22 52 8 88.5 Math (HS) 21 27 29 23 71.5 Science (all grades) 4 17 39 40 52.4 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ELA 41.0 34.0 45.0 39.5 43.0 Math 32.0 37.0 30.0 39.0

Level 5 district update: Holyoke Achievement   % EE % ME % PME % NME Avg. SS ELA (3-8) 1 13 50 36 479.0 Math (3-8) 10 47 42 475.7 % A % P % NI % W/F CPI ELA (HS) 18 56 16 11 86.9 Math (HS) 20 27 26 71.0 Science (all grades) 3 15 46 50.9 Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ELA 46.0 43.0 39.0 48.0 37.0 Math 51.0 53.0 45.0 40.0 42.0 31.0