Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HSAG Performance Improvement Projects Using Data to Develop Interventions and Statistical Testing to Evaluate Results Breakout Session #1 Florida EQR.
Advertisements

Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Technical Assistance for Florida Medicaid PMHPs August 21 st, 2007 Christy Hormann, MSW PIP Review Team Project.
WELCOME to the PIP Technical Assistance Training for Florida HMOs/PSNs We will begin shortly. Please place your phone on mute, unless you are speaking.
MCO Participation in External Quality Review Mandatory Activities During the SMMC Transition October 30, 2013 Presenter: Mary Wiley, BSW, RN, M.Ed. Project.
Title: The title should accurately describe the issue to be addressed and can never contain a proposed countermeasure. Overview Note: Remember that the.
Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. Performance Improvement Projects Nursing Home Diversion Program Where Are We Now? Concurrent Breakout Session #2 Florida.
Welcome to the EQR Quarterly Meeting! Wednesday, March 26, :00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. (EDT) We will begin shortly. Call-in information is ,
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, September 26, p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. February 14, 2008.
Causal / Barrier Analysis Florida EQR Quarterly Meeting
Quality Improvement Strategies Root Cause and Subgroup Analyses.
External Quality Review Organization (EQRO) Kick-Off Meeting
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
Slide 1 Plan−Do−Study−Act! Using the PDSA Cycle to Improve Your Performance Improvement Projects March 18, 2014 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group June 18, :15 p.m.–4:45.
WELCOME! External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Wednesday, June 18, :00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. WELCOME!
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis January 12, 2011 Christy Hormann, MSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIPs.
Evaluating a Research Report
Preliminary Results of the Special Health Care Needs Focused Study Tuesday, June 19, :15 p.m. –1:45 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director, Statistical.
Performance Improvement Projects: Validating Process, Tips, and Hints Eric Jackson, MA Research Analyst October 19, 2009.
Slide 1 Florida SIPP Quarterly Meeting Presenter: Jolene Rasmussen, MS Healthcare Analyst, PIP Review Team March 23, 2011.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
NHDP Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 30th, 2010 Presenters: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, Research and Analysis Yolanda.
Validation of Performance Measures for PMHPs Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group.
HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. January 11, 2011.
Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Tuesday, June 27, :45 p.m. – 4:45 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Prepaid Mental Health Plans Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Cheryl L. Neel, RN,
Slide 1 HMO/PSN Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 26, 2011 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Project Manager, PIP Review.
Special Health Care Needs Focused Study Update 12:45 p.m. – 1:15 p.m. Presenter: David Mabb, MS, CHCA Senior Director, Statistical Evaluation.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101 Monday, June 18, :30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director of Statistical.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team.
Building the Perfect PIP for HMOs and PSNs Facilitators: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Manager, Performance Improvement Projects Debbie Chotkevys, DHA, MBA.
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Functional Area Assessment
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Insert Title here- Keep the Title Concise
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Plan−Do−Study−Act! Using the PDSA Cycle to Improve Your Performance Improvement Projects March 18, 2014 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Nursing Home Diversion Programs Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Cheryl L. Neel,
Title List your Team Members
Description (“If-Then”)
Preceptor Team members
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101
June 21, 2018 Amy McCurry Schwartz, Esq., MHSA EQRO Consultant
Performance Improvement Projects: PIP Library
HIV Cross-Part Care Continuum Collaborative Milestones
Applicants’ Orientation Meeting
HEDIS® Compliance Audit™ and Supplemental data
Title List your Team Members
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
Experiment Report Format
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Title List your Team Members
[List team members here] June 14, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team

Activity I: Choose the Study Topic The study topic should: Be selected following collection and analysis of data- if the MCO is a new plan and has no historical or plan- specific data, the documentation in Activity I should reflect this. The MCO should provide its effective enrollment date and the rationale for not having data. Have the potential to affect member health, outcomes of care, functional status, or satisfaction. The MCO should be documenting the link between the study topic and outcomes of care.

Activity II: State the Study Question The study question should: State the problem to be studied in simple terms and be in the recommended X/Y format “ Does doing X result in Y?”

Activity III: Identify the Study Population The study population should: Be accurately and completely defined and capture all members to whom the study question applies Include all applicable codes that identify members for the population (denominator)

Activity IV: Select the Study Indicator The study indicator(s) should: Be well-defined, objective, and measures changes in health or functional status, consumer satisfaction, or valid process alternatives Allow for the study question to be answered (the study question and study indicator should be in alignment) Include the title of the study indicator(s) in the gray shaded box Include remeasurement goals. The goals should be documented as percentages

Activity V: Use Valid Sampling Techniques If sampling was used (most HEDIS-based PIPs), the MCO should complete the table in Activity V If sampling was not used (most administrative data- based PIPs), the MCO should state that sampling was not used

Activity VI: Define Data Collection The step-by-step process that leads to the production of the study indicator(s) rates should be documented The MCO should include a copy of the manual data collection tool, if applicable When surveys are used to collect data, the MCO should include a copy of the survey, CATI script if applicable, and cover letter that accompanies the survey The data analysis plan should be documented (how rates are calculated, how rates will be compared to the goal, and what statistical test will be used

Activity VII: Analyze Data and Interpret Study Results Data Analysis The MCOs should complete the data table for all PIPs that have progressed to the point of reporting data For HEDIS-based PIPs, the rates reported in the PIP should match the MCOs rates reported to AHCA The rates in the data table should be reported accurately (numerator divided by the denominator) The measurement periods documented in Activity VII should match those documented in Activity IV

Activity VIII: Implementing Interventions and Improvement Strategies Improvement strategies should: Be related to causes/barriers identified through data analysis and quality improvement processes- the MCOs should be describing what quality improvement tools were used to identify barriers Be revised if there was a decline in performance The MCOs should be documenting the process used to evaluate the effectiveness of its interventions The interventions should align with the barriers and directly impact the study indicator(s)

Disparity PIP TIPs Disparity PIPs must have two study indicators The MCO must have identified a statistically significant difference between two entities (i.e., race/ethnicities, age groups) for there to be a true disparity. This information should be documented in Activity I The focus of the PIP should be to increase the rates for the two study indicators and to eliminate the disparity The study question should be structured to reflect an increase in both rates and eliminate the disparity

Tips for Retiring PIPs Before a PIP can be considered for retirement, the PIP should include at least baseline and two remeasurement periods of data The study indicator(s) have achieved statistically significant improvement over the baseline and sustained the improvement If a PIP has been in progress for greater than five years and all ten activities have been completed- consider the PIP for retirement. If rates are suboptimal, the MCO can continue its efforts for improvement internally

General PIP Tips For HEDIS-based PIPs, the MCOs should provide the HEDIS technical specifications annually Data collection tools and surveys should be submitted on an annual basis Verify that the survey question listed in the PIP matches the question in the survey Review submitted Fishbone and/or cause and effect diagrams annually to ensure that they have been updated Use the Interactive Data Submission System (IDSS) document to verify reported HEDIS rates

Questions and Answers