Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.

Advertisements

CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice

What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.

The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.

Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco

Do you know your civil rights?

Miranda Rights 5th Amendment

Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?

Miranda v. Arizona.

BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.

Miranda v. Arizona Background Information - Phoenix, Arizona Ernesto Miranda arrested for kidnapping and rape -Interrogated for 2 hrs and.

1966 Chief Justice Warren’s handwritten notes about the case.

Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.

Miranda v Arizona Escobedo v Illinois By Austin Lallier.

Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.

Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.

Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.

By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.

Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.

Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.

Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.

Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!

Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.

Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.

Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.

Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.

Miranda v. Arizona GREYSON PETTUS PLS 211 MR. NOEL DECEMBER 2ND, 2015.

 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.

Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.

By Colby Beighey Period 9. About Ernesto Miranda  Born on March 9, 1941  Grew up in Mesa, Arizona  His mother died  His father remarried  Did not.

Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.

Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.

Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.

The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,

 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.

Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.

Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.

Miranda v. Arizona.

Marisa Hanning Emily Bendik Katie Kraeer

Miranda Rights.

Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.

Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F

John F. Kennedy

Landmark Cases Mapp v. Ohio Tinker v. Des Moines Miranda v. Arizona

Defining the meaning of the terms in the warning

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines

Cole Kirschner, Paige Haney, Kelsey Hickle

Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs

By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como

Miranda v. Arizona (1966).

Rights of Criminal Suspects

Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment

Important Court Cases of the 20th Century

Lesson 6- Copy the following

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Case Study Project

Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.

Miranda v. Arizona 1966.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Fifth and Sixth Amendments

Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…

Case Studies Chapter 1.

by Marcos Cardona-7th period

Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.

Miranda vs. Arizona.

Marisa Hanning Emily Bendik Katie Kraeer

By: Michaela Hull and Elena Butler

The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments

Presentation transcript:

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court

Ernesto Miranda was arrested by the Phoenix, AZ police on charges of kidnapping and rape Wife’s car Led to him as suspect Police line-up While in custody Miranda wasn’t informed of his rights

After 2 hour interrogation: Signed a confession Convicted in court based on his confession Appeal was based on a violation of his 5th amendment right of “no self-incrimination”. He was never informed of his right to remain silent and to have a lawyer present.

Supreme Court agrees and orders a new trial without the signed confession New Trial – Verdict????? Miranda was convicted again based on new evidence!

Significance: Establishes the “Miranda Rights/Warning” Suspects must be informed of their rights before interrogation. http://www.mirandawarning.org/whatareyourmirandarights.html