Railway network / Quality of life / sustainable development Paper 2 Question 3 Railway network / Quality of life / sustainable development

Both harm and good should be discussed (a) Evaluate the impact of the expansion of Hong Kong’s railway network on the quality of life of Hong Kong citizens. (10 marks) Both harm and good should be discussed Evaluate  shows stance “more harm than good” / “more good than harm” e.g. short term, affected minority only, can be compensated

Focus on the concept of Quality of life Supported with relevant examples e.g. Western District/ Sai Ying Pun X Sai Kung, Shun Lee Estate Avoid general discussion without concrete examples e.g. pollution, job opportunity, biodiversity

If no comparison, max. 6 marks (b) Which measure, the promotion of cycling or the expansion of Hong Kong’s railway network, is more effective in promoting sustainable development in Hong Kong? (10 marks) Comparison If no comparison, max. 6 marks

Parameter for comparison + Compare merits and limitations of the two options Impact on sustainable development

Inter-generational equity Intra-generational equity Balance economic and environmental development Inter-generational equity Intra-generational equity Railway network: more branches of chain stores set up (economic benefit) while contributed to better air quality (environmental benefit) Zero- emission  relieve global warming Connection with other communities, relieve traffic jam, convenience Cycling: Boost tourism (economic benefit) while pollution-free (environmental benefit) Zero-emission  relieve global warming better air quality, health Compare by parameter * coverage / extensiveness * acceptance / feasibility * appropriateness