Continuously Research on ASEP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Woo-jin Jung Ministry of Construction & Transportation Republic of Korea Implementation of SDoC in Koreas Automotive Sector March 21, 2005.
Advertisements

Federal Highway Research Institute Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) Federal Highway Research Institute.
Some observations on the base of the ASEP dBase Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
CARS 21 A strategic vision towards increased internationalisation in the automotive sector What does it entail for the World Forum for Harmonisation of.
Technical Regulating in the Russian Federation and Adoption into Its National Laws of the Global Technical Regulations Established under 1998 Agreement.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
The Planning Regions Legend (reduced): urban agglomeration rural area
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
Applied AcousticsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Wolfgang Kropp Tor Kihlman Jens Forss é n Lars Ivarsson.
Datum (Tag.Monat.Jahr) OICA Method – short overview IG ASEP, Japan – Draft for an OICA presentation FG. GRBIG-ASEP
Department of Municipal Hygiene and Occupational Health. Lecture on environmental sanitation for the 5th year Lecture Subject: Hygienic bases layout and.
Plans for China vehicle noise standards working group 1 Informal document GRB (62 nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda items 9 & 16 )
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
1 Automotive industry Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles: New EU Commission legislative proposal World Forum on Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) 156.
Noise Pollution This does not include me. Definition and Types  Definition  Harmful or annoying levels of noise, as from airplanes, industry etc. 
Outcome of Meeting on “Environmentally Friendly Vehicle” on Noise Date : 15 th February th Informal Group Meeting on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Concerning regarding the future development of ECE R28 1 Informal document GRB (63 rd GRB, February 2016, agenda item 2) Transmitted by the.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
Electric safety requirements in European Community vehicle type-approval legislation GRSP ELSA sub-group – 6 th meeting Brussels, Belgium, April.
Noise Mitigation Possibilities for Quieter Cities in Europe CAETS 2012 Zürich Tor Kihlman, Chair CAETS Noise Control Technology Committee Chalmers.
Tallinn Free public transport impacts on the city environment Relo Ligi, Environmental Department of Tallinn.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
© 2016 Global Market Insights. All Rights Reserved Mineral Wool Material Market ( ): Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2016.
INTRODUCTION OF MOTOR VEHICLES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN VIETNAM
Transmitted by the representative of the
Better service , better government
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Vehicle Noise Standards System of China
Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation
INTEGRATED PERMITTING PROCEDURE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
An overview of the latest development on “ECO-Driving”
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
64th GRB EU Regulation on AVAS requirements
Environmental Orientation
Noise problems and driving conditions in China based on ECE R51.03
Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles
Reversing Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles
Updates Key areas of CCSA action: Next Generation Network: SDN, NFV
Driving conditions and conclusions of China on ASEP test method
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
9th Noise Experts Group meeting 30 November 2017
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event (BMFE)
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N- Vehicles
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
Strengthening Tyre limits ! New developments (2)
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Cooperatives Amendment Bills
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Market Research of RWS (with Low mode, without off switch) in Japan
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Informal document GRB-55-16
Maximum allowable Override Force
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
Comments on tyre choosing of UN Regulation No
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Comments on Document WT-02-02
Presentation transcript:

Continuously Research on ASEP 8th ASEP IWG, 10-12 July, 2018. Brussels, Belgium. Continuously Research on ASEP China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd 1 1

Contents Noise management is not only the job of the industry Traffic noise problems and complaints Possible solutions for traffic noise Key points for traffic noise Key points and R51-03 contents Duties of industry High performance vehicle behaviors 2

Noise management is not only the job of the industry Public comments list of GB 1495 led by Ministry of Ecology and Environment - National Development and Reform Commission - Ministry of Industry and Information Technology - Ministry of Public Security - Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development - Ministry of Transport - Ministry of Commerce - State Administration for Market Regulation - Department of Ecology and Environment Protection of Provinces - Technical Service Organization - Manufacturers 3

Traffic noise problems and complaints According to China Environmental Noise Prevention and Control Annual Report (2017), in 2016 the traffic noise accounted 21.7% and construction noise accounted 4.1% of traffic noise problems and complaints But the complaints for traffic noise accounted only 3.0%, compared to the 50.1% for the construction noise. Why? Are the complaints on vehicles, manufacturers, owners, drivers or roads? 4

Possible solutions for traffic noise Acoustic environment regional planning - Any other treatments cannot solve questions basically. Control noise resource - Limit speed, prohibit the horn, quiet road surface, quiet tyres. Control the path - Sound barriers, green the road and environment. Strength the building - Soundproof windows or walls. The solutions are from: ASEP-03-03 - (China) Background and concerns from China on ASEP theory and test method. 5

Key points for traffic noise Acoustic environment regional planning and Control the path (necessary) Control noise resource (necessary) Strength the building (unequal) Manufacturers Municipal Type approval, COP New vehicles Roads Owner and Driver Planning and surface In-use vehicles Driving behavior Where are the duties of vehicle drivers or owners for traffic noise? 6

Key points and R51-03 contents New vehicles 6.2 Limit values, annex 3, annex 5, annex 7, e-ASEP, COP In-use vehicles 6.1 General specifications Driving behavior Public Security Roads Transport, planning and construction In-use vehicles and driving behavior management are urgent. In-use vehicle = durability + owners behaviors. Can ASEP test methods or OICA model support in-use vehicle management? 7

Duties of industry The industry, especially the leading manufacturers, should lead the direction of technology and social development. The influence on the opinions of new generation. The fashion trends. Good for customers and others. Leading the requirements of your customers to a healthy and good direction. 8

High performance vehicle behaviors Normal design:6AT, 192kW, PMR=112. Gears for Annex 3 tests: 3rd gear. 9

High performance vehicle behaviors Sports style:7AT, 185kW, PMR=97. Gears for Annex 3 tests: ---- 10

High performance vehicle behaviors Sports style:CVT, 185kW, PMR=1000. Gears for Annex 3 tests: D 11

Conclusion Simplification ASEP tests is possible. OICA model will make sense for in-use vehicle also. The whole life of vehicle should be considered. Only ASEP for TA or COP is not enough, the whole management system should be engaged. 12

Thanks for your attention National Automotive Standardization Technical Committee Thanks for your attention Web site:www.catarc.org.cn 13