Land Use Permit Tracking: Monitoring and Evaluation of Land Use Regulatory Programs for Salmon Recovery Planning in Hood Canal Scott Brewer, Hood Canal.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Funding Monitoring in 2006 – the Programs role in a West Coast Partnership November 16, 2005.

Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

WRIA 8 Plan Updates 3-Year Work Plan and 10-Year Start List WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council March 18, 2010.

1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.

Strategic Hatchery Management Roadmap to Success Don Campton U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, OR.

Puget Sound Coordinated Monitoring and Assessment Program April 15, 2008 Science Panel Update and Discussion.

Current Conservation Issues in DoD L. Peter Boice OSD Conservation Team Leader Presented to NMFWA, Dallas TX March 2002.

Using the Open Standards to Advance Puget Sound Recovery Kari Stiles, PhD Puget Sound Partnership Conservation Measures Partnership Oct 7-9, 2014.

Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.

Local Updates to Shoreline Management Master Programs Kitsap County and Cities Discussion Meetings Informational Briefing.

Hood Canal Integrated Watershed Management Plan: A Framework for Assessing the Relationships between Ecological and Socioeconomic Systems and Conserving.

Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association Developing an Environmental Management System for the Pacific Coast Shellfish Industry.

Critical Habitat Designation for Pacific Salmon and Steelhead.

Climate Impacts on Salmon Recovery in the Snohomish River Basin James Battin Krista Bartz Mary Ruckelshaus Hiroo Imaki Matthew Wiley Elizabeth Korb Richard.

Endangered Species Act

Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.

Critical Habitat Designation Pacific Salmon and Steelhead Southern Resident Killer Whales.

Recent Events in Water Law and Policy in the United States Portion of the Columbia Basin The Federal Columbia River Power System: Pacific Salmon and the.

Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.

Puget Sound Initiative 2007 At A Glance Jay Manning, Director Washington Department of Ecology April 26,

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.

A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)

Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Program for Mark-selective Chinook Salmon Fisheries in Puget Sound, Washington Washington Department of.

The HCCC Integrated Watershed Plan Alliance for a Healthy South Sound Council 19 May 2015 Purpose: – Establish strategic priorities for the HCCC to implement.

United for the benefit of all Regional Coordination.

WRIA 8 Status and Trends Monitoring ( ) Hans B. Berge, Dan Lantz, Scott Stolnack, and Curtis DeGasperi King County Department of Natural Resources.

Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.

1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.

Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.

Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.

IN PUGET SOUND & COASTAL WASHINGTON Hatchery Reform February 2003.

Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.

Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.

Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.

Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.

Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.

Government Management Accountability & Performance Program Natural Resources Cabinet Presentation October 6 th, 2010 A Healthy Puget Sound By 2020.

Planning under the Growth Management Act

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.

Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.

Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.

Alliance for a Healthy South Sound March 25, 2015.

Puget Sound Harvest Status of ESA and NEPA Review Susan Bishop Sustainable Fisheries Division NOAA Fisheries

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

West Coast Salmon Genetic Stock Identification Collaboration Renee Bellinger, Coordinator.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.

Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007 Hood Canal and Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca Summer Chum Salmon Recovery Plan The Hood Canal.

DNR Supplemental Budget DNR Budget Priorities Address Budget Shortfall in Parks and Trails Respond to Emerging Issues NorthMet Legal Support Costs.

National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.

Russian River Estuary Management.

NAVFAC PACIFIC March st North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference National Military Fish and Wildlife Association Marine Conservation.

Indiana Bats, Fire, and the Endangered Species Act Sue Cameron US Fish & Wildlife Service April 16, 2013.

DNR Supplemental Budget 2016

BLM Decision Making Process

Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy

Projecting Buildout Conditions in the Hood Canal Watershed

Coordinator of Research, Development, and Evaluation Position

EEA 2017 State of European waters

Status of Washington Steelhead 2006

Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning

FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources

Endangered Species.

Environmental Regulations:

North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019

Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis

Presentation transcript:

Land Use Permit Tracking: Monitoring and Evaluation of Land Use Regulatory Programs for Salmon Recovery Planning in Hood Canal Scott Brewer, Hood Canal Coordinating Council Gretchen Peterson, PetersonGIS John Kliem, Creative Community Consultants

Hood Canal and Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca summer chum salmon Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning Response to Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listing of Hood Canal summer chum and Puget Sound chinook salmon in 1999 Large body of biological work (primarily harvest and hatchery aspects) already existed or in progress Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning and Land Use Habitat Projects (engineered log jams, dike removal) Programmatic (land use regulatory programs; growth management, critical areas, shoreline programs) Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning and Land Use Plan needed to involve the land use authorities Provide a forum for engagement of the Counties Allow tracking and accountability for land use programs and activities Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning and Land Use Examined build-out Reviewed land use regulatory programs Concluded: Current programs support recovery Assuming no variances nor exemptions and enforcement is effective Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning and Land Use Good news… Suffering from the sins of the past If current regulatory regime was in place 100 or even 50 years ago, may not have as bad of a habitat problem Initially, will rely heavily on restoration projects and land acquisition Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning and Land Use Bad news… Not everyone is buying this conclusion Growth and development pressure is real Current regulations are not strong enough Enforcement not effective, if it exists at all Variances and exemptions are real Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Salmon Recovery Planning and Land Use Are current local land use codes working as intended, as they exist in code? Are situations where the codes are not being applied uniformly undermining the overall effectiveness of those various codes? Are there other activities that are cumulatively aiding fish that need to be considered? Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Land Use Permit Tracking Can a system be developed to track land use? Is the frequency of the information reported adequate to assess changes that impact salmon habitat? How does the permit information impact future implementation and development? How can the Counties, Tribal Councils, and HCCC Board use this information? Can this information be used to update land use codes; trigger revisions to standards, codes, and requirements; affect implementation policy? Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Land Use Permit Tracking Baseline for current impervious area information is 2003 Gathering recent (since 2003): building permit information Forest practice applications Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Permitted impervious surface area in 2005 (Basin total/ESU geographic region total) Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007

Land Use Permit Tracking Work in progress Begin discussions with biologists and County planning staff Present data and information collected Discuss trends and interpretations Next steps? Georgia Basin Puget Sound Research Conference March 2007