LIGO Detector Commissioning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G W "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) LIGO for Chemists Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO-G W Gearing Up for Gravitational Waves: Commissioning LIGO Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Measuring Ripples in the Geometry of Space Fred Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G W "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors, Especially.
Status of the LIGO Project
2/9/2006Welcome to LIGO1 Welcome to LIGO!. 2/9/2006Welcome to LIGO2 LIGO: A detector that measures very tiny displacements How tiny?
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
LIGO-G W The Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory May 26, 2001.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
LIGO-G W The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Reported.
LIGO-G W Measuring Ripples in the Geometry of Space Fred Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
LIGO-G W Status of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Joshua Smith December 2003 Detector Characterization of Dual-Recycled GEO600 Joshua Smith for the GEO600 team.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
LIGO-G W Commissioning and Performance of the LIGO Interferometers Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G D “First Lock” for the LIGO Detectors 20 October 2000 LIGO Hanford Observatory Stan Whitcomb.
LIGO Commissioning Status
Abstract The Hannover Thermal Noise Experiment V. Leonhardt, L. Ribichini, H. Lück and K. Danzmann Max-Planck- Institut für Gravitationsphysik We measure.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory November 8, 2005
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Fred Raab LIGO Hanford Observatory
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Presentation transcript:

LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory

Basic Signature of Gravitational Waves LIGO Detector Commissioning

Power-Recycled Fabry-Perot-Michelson Interferometer suspended mirrors mark inertial frames antisymmetric port carries GW signal Symmetric port carries common-mode info LIGO Detector Commissioning

Commissioning Time Line LIGO Detector Commissioning

Some of the Technical Challenges Typical Strains < 10-21 at Earth ~ 1 hair’s width at 4 light years Understand displacement fluctuations of 4-km arms at the millifermi level (1/1000th of a proton diameter) Control arm lengths to 10-13 meters RMS Detect optical phase changes of ~ 10-10 radians Hold mirror alignments to 10-8 radians Engineer structures to mitigate recoil from atomic vibrations in suspended mirrors LIGO Detector Commissioning

What Limits Sensitivity of Interferometers? Seismic noise & vibration limit at low frequencies Atomic vibrations (Thermal Noise) inside components limit at mid frequencies Quantum nature of light (Shot Noise) limits at high frequencies Myriad details of the lasers, electronics, etc., can make problems above these levels LIGO Detector Commissioning

Vibration Isolation Systems Reduce in-band seismic motion by 4 - 6 orders of magnitude Little or no attenuation below 10Hz Large range actuation for initial alignment and drift compensation Quiet actuation to correct for Earth tides and microseism at 0.15 Hz during observation BSC Chamber HAM Chamber LIGO Detector Commissioning

Seismic Isolation – Springs and Masses damped spring cross section LIGO Detector Commissioning

Seismic System Performance HAM stack in air BSC stack in vacuum 102 100 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 10-10 Horizontal Vertical LIGO Detector Commissioning

Core Optics Suspension and Control Optics suspended as simple pendulums Shadow sensors & voice-coil actuators provide damping and control forces Mirror is balanced on 30 micron diameter wire to 1/100th degree of arc LIGO Detector Commissioning

Feedback & Control for Mirrors and Light Damp suspended mirrors to vibration-isolated tables 14 mirrors  (pos, pit, yaw, side) = 56 loops Damp mirror angles to lab floor using optical levers 7 mirrors  (pit, yaw) = 14 loops Pre-stabilized laser (frequency, intensity, pre-mode-cleaner) = 3 loops Cavity length control (mode-cleaner, common-mode frequency, common-arm, differential arm, michelson, power-recycling) = 6 loops Wave-front sensing/control Beam-centering control 2 arms  (pit, yaw) = 4 loops LIGO Detector Commissioning

Suspended Mirror Approximates a Free Mass Above Resonance Blue: suspended mirror XF Cyan: free mass XF Data taken using shadow sensors & voice coil actuators LIGO Detector Commissioning

Frequency Stabilization of the Light Employs Three Stages Pre-stabilized laser delivers light to the long mode cleaner Start with high-quality, custom-built Nd:YAG laser Improve frequency, amplitude and spatial purity of beam Actuator inputs provide for further laser stabilization Wideband Tidal IO 4 km 15m 10-Watt Laser PSL Interferometer LIGO Detector Commissioning

Pre-stabilized Laser (PSL) Custom-built 10 W Nd:YAG Laser, joint development with Lightwave Electronics (now commercial product) Cavity for defining beam geometry, joint development with Stanford Frequency reference cavity (inside oven) LIGO Detector Commissioning

Interferometer Length Control System Multiple Input / Multiple Output Three tightly coupled cavities Ill-conditioned (off-diagonal) plant matrix Highly nonlinear response over most of phase space Transition to stable, linear regime takes plant through singularity Employs adaptive control system that evaluates plant evolution and reconfigures feedback paths and gains during lock acquisition LIGO Detector Commissioning

Digital Interferometer Sensing & Control System LIGO Detector Commissioning

LIGO Detector Commissioning Digital Controls screen example Digital calibration input Analog In Analog Out LIGO Detector Commissioning

Why is Locking Difficult? One meter Human hair, about 100 microns Earthtides, about 100 microns Wavelength of light, about 1 micron Microseismic motion, about 1 micron Atomic diameter, 10-10 meter Precision required to lock, about 10-10 meter Nuclear diameter, 10-15 meter LIGO sensitivity, 10-18 meter LIGO Detector Commissioning

Tidal Compensation Data Tidal evaluation on 21-hour locked section of S1 data Predicted tides Feedforward Feedback Residual signal on voice coils Residual signal on laser LIGO Detector Commissioning

LIGO Detector Commissioning Microseism Microseism at 0.12 Hz dominates ground velocity Trended data (courtesy of Gladstone High School) shows large variability of microseism, on several-day- and annual- cycles Reduction by feed-forward derived from seismometers LIGO Detector Commissioning

Calibration of the Detectors Combination of DC (calibrates voice coil actuation of suspended mirror) and Swept-Sine methods (accounts for gain vs. frequency) calibrate meters of mirror motion per count at digital suspension controllers across the frequency spectrum DC calibration methods fringe counting (precision to few %) fringe stepping (precision to few %) fine actuator drive, readout by dial indicator (accuracy to ~10%) comparison with predicted earth tides (sanity check to ~25%) AC calibration measures transfer functions of digital suspension controllers periodically under operating conditions (also inject test wave forms to test data analysis pipelines CW Calibration lines injected during running to monitor optical gain changes due to drift LIGO Detector Commissioning

Noise Equivalent Strain Spectra for S1 LIGO Detector Commissioning

LIGO Sensitivity Over Time Livingston 4km Interferometer May 01 Jan 03 LIGO Detector Commissioning

Background Forces in GW Band = Thermal Noise ~ kBT/mode xrms  10-11 m f < 1 Hz xrms  210-17 m f ~ 350 Hz xrms  510-16 m f  10 kHz Strategy: Compress energy into narrow resonance outside band of interest  require high mechanical Q, low friction LIGO Detector Commissioning

Thermal Noise Observed in 1st Violins on H2, L1 During S1 ~ 20 millifermi RMS for each free wire segment LIGO Detector Commissioning

Commissioning Achievements Stable locking of 4-km interferometers with power recycling factors of ~40 and lock durations up to 66 hours Achievement of 10-13 m RMS arm length stabilization Steadily improving sensitivity Development of digital suspension controllers provides agility in tailoring control-loops Partial implementation of wave-front sensing & alignment control stabilizes sensitivity to within several % over 1/2-day time scales Tidal and Microseism compensation systems work Initial look at thermal-noise parameters exhibit expected properties Optical characterization of losses in long arm cavities look good LIGO Detector Commissioning

Commissioning Tasks Remaining Complete commissioning of wave-front & beam-centering control systems to stabilize alignment Commission intensity stabilization system Operate interferometers at full laser power Improve RFI immunity Install active seismic pre-isolators in Livingston to extend duty cycle Compensate for degeneracy issues in recycling cavity LIGO Detector Commissioning

LIGO Detector Commissioning Seismic noise in 1-3 Hz band 0.9 0.6 Microns/sec Active Seismic Isolation to be installed at Livingston to extend duty cycle 0.3 night day night day night Monday AM Fractional time in lock LIGO Detector Commissioning

Despite a few difficulties, science runs started in 2002. LIGO Detector Commissioning