Strategic Directions 2014-2020 AHC Planning Retreat November 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
To 2012… and Beyond Finishing what we have started…
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
STRATEGIC PLANS An Overview of Plans Within Maricopa.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements 2011.
District Improvement Plan August 10, 2015.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Educational Master Plan Update Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC) November 19, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Educational Master Plan Update Open Forum November 11, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
IT Strategic Plan Project Consultation with Web Advisory Committee 19 December 2012.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Cañada College Educational Master Plan Public Forum
A Productive Partnership
Committee Orientation
Waste Diversion Planning
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
INTEGRATING STUDENT SUCCESS THROUGHOUT YOUR COLLEGE: ARE YOUR SYSTEMS, PROCESSES AND EMPLOYEES ALIGNED?
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Student and Family Support
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators Leadership and Vision.
What’s New at ACCJC? PRESENTERS
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Themes Collaboration – vertical and horizontal Autonomy at all levels
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
ISER Committee Presentations
MISSION VISION VALUES Planning Retreat
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
February 21-22, 2018.
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Office of Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2014
School Development Planning
School District No.73 (Kamloops/Thompson)
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Accreditation follow-up report
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
to Sustainably Develop Nurse Leaders in Targeted Areas of Excellence
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Directions 2014-2020 AHC Planning Retreat November 2013

Summary of Day 1 Reviewed accomplishments from 2009-2013 Strategic Plan AHC is in the green again! New laws currently and will continue to mean substantive changes for AHC (3SP, etc.) Lists of resource needs are long and expensive Data reveals room for improvement Began process of mission, vision and values review Master planning processes are underway

Resource Themes Presented by Vice Presidents on Day I Instruction: Support for student learning Student Services: Meet Requirements of SSSP Facilities: Stewardship of the physical plant Administrative Services: Ensure proper and efficient management of resources President’s Office: Support for college operations that enhance the institutional mission

Mission and Strategic Directions From ACCJC: Mission “The institutional mission provides the impetus for achieving student learning and goals that the institution endeavors to accomplish.” Institutional Planning and Evaluation “…The institution provides evidence of planning for improvement of institutional structures and processes, student achievement of educational goals, and student learning. The institution assesses progress toward its stated goals and makes decisions regarding improvement through an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation, and re-evaluation.”

Current Strategic Directions 2009-2013 Institutional Effectiveness Student Learning Resources Governance Matched/Mapped to ACCJC Standards

ACCJC Standards Standard I: Institutional Effectiveness Mission Improving Institutional Effectiveness Standard II: Student Learning Instructional Programs Student Support Services Library & Learning Support Standard III: Resources Human Physical Technology Financial Standard IV: Leadership & Governance Decision-Making Roles and Processes Board & Admin. Organization

And, with all of that in mind…

Why Plan So Far Ahead? “ Someone's sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago.” ― Warren Buffett

Table Activity Consider: What “trees” would AHC like to plant and cultivate over the next six years? Each table has two leaves: one existing strategic direction and one “other” a. Does the existing strategic direction language suit AHC in 2013 and beyond? If not, work in your group to suggest changes/edits. b. Is a strategic direction missing from the current four directions? If so, suggest a new/additional strategic direction.

Group Activity 1) Work with the table directly across from you to develop one cohesive recommendation for changes/edits to the existing strategic direction. 2) Exchange and discuss your suggestions for “other.” Ponder, question, and refine the language. 3) Each combined group will report out on: 1. changes/edits to the one strategic direction 2. “others”

Group 1 Strategic Direction 1: Institutional Effectiveness Other(s): District policies and processes ensure the effectiveness of the teaching and learning culture and emphasize collaboration and communication. These will be regularly assessed to demonstrate a commitment to the mission statement. Need for evaluation/assessment Commitment to mission statement Goal: ensure institutional commitment to promoting/training that relate to collaboration and communication & efficiency and effectiveness Other(s): Problem: less/diminished support for public education Need: Increase outreach and community involvement Improve our effectiveness in the community Community relationships and collaboration Tell our story

Group 2 Strategic Direction 2: Student Learning Other(s): Provide educational programs and comprehensive student support services that promote student success and respond to assessment of learning outcomes. Other(s): Change mission statement language to reflect: “diverse educational opportunities” Include student engagement: student life/engagement is missing from strategic directions

Group 3 Strategic Direction 3: Resources Other(s): The responsible and effective development and management of resources (human, financial, technology, facility, natural, and community) Stress more dynamic and proactive engagement Goal 3.5: Partnering and collaborating with the community in multiple ways to advance the mission of the college. Goal 3.2: (reported as an “other”) Expand the pursuit of community partnerships to advance the mission of the college. Other(s): To transform innovation into creative practices: Goal: Establish a forum to serve as a clearinghouse for current and future trends (i.e., MOOCS, competency based skills and knowledge assessment vs. Carnegie Hour, cloud technology, etc.) Goal: Partner with workforce, industry and community

Group 4 Strategic Direction 4: Governance Other(s): Informed leadership, shared governance and communication committed to meeting the needs of the college and community. Be Proactive rather than reactive Informed leadership through shared governance to effectively meet District and community needs. We need effective governance. Foster mutual respect, collaboration, innovation & creativity Communication – transparent, open, collaborative, receptive, accessible Other(s): Expand pursuit of community partnerships