Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
Eva Decotto, Allan C. Spradling  Developmental Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Asterless Reduction during Spermiogenesis Is Regulated by Plk4 and Is Essential for Zygote Development in Drosophila  Atul Khire, Alberto A. Vizuet, Enrique.
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Dcr-1 Maintains Drosophila Ovarian Stem Cells
Persistent Replicative Stress Alters Polycomb Phenotypes and Tissue Homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster  Severine Landais, Cecilia D’Alterio, D. Leanne.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
LET-418/Mi2 and SPR-5/LSD1 Cooperatively Prevent Somatic Reprogramming of C. elegans Germline Stem Cells  Stéphanie Käser-Pébernard, Fritz Müller, Chantal.
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis  X. Rebecca Sheng, Crista M. Brawley, Erika.
Phf7 Controls Male Sex Determination in the Drosophila Germline
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
A Broadly Conserved Pathway Generates 3′UTR-Directed Primary piRNAs
Jacob Gonzalez, Hongying Qi, Na Liu, Haifan Lin  Cell Reports 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Temporal and Spatial Control of Germ-Plasm RNAs
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal  Judith L. Leatherman,
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
A Wolbachia-Sensitive Communication between Male and Female Pupae Controls Gamete Compatibility in Drosophila  Stéphanie M. Pontier, François Schweisguth 
Melissa L. Ehlers, Barbara Celona, Brian L. Black  Cell Reports 
Alternative Germ Cell Death Pathway in Drosophila Involves HtrA2/Omi, Lysosomes, and a Caspase-9 Counterpart  Keren Yacobi-Sharon, Yuval Namdar, Eli Arama 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Devendra S. Mistry, Yifang Chen, George L. Sen  Cell Stem Cell 
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 14, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Nicola Iovino, Filippo Ciabrelli, Giacomo Cavalli  Developmental Cell 
Retinoic Acid Antagonizes Testis Development in Mice
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Activin Signals through SMAD2/3 to Increase Photoreceptor Precursor Yield during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation  Amy Q. Lu, Evgenya Y. Popova, Colin.
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek  Stem Cell Reports 
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 3178-3189 (December 2017) The Germline Linker Histone dBigH1 and the Translational Regulator Bam Form a Repressor Loop Essential for Male Germ Stem Cell Differentiation  Albert Carbonell, Salvador Pérez-Montero, Paula Climent-Cantó, Oscar Reina, Fernando Azorín  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 3178-3189 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Pattern of dBigH1 Expression during Spermatogenesis (A) Immunostaining of the tip region of a wild-type testis with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red) and αvasa (in green). Regions corresponding to TA spermatogonial cells and spermatocytes are indicated. (B) As in (A), but for αTj (in green). (C) As in (A), but for phalloidin (in green), a high-affinity F-actin probe that marks the somatic hub cells (arrowhead). (D) Immunostaining of a wild-type testis expressing an esg-LacZ reporter with αdBigH1 (in red), αLacZ (in green), and αFasciclin III antibodies (also in green). αFasciclin III antibodies mark the hub (arrowhead). Asterisks indicate αLacZ-positive cells that express dBigH1 and are not attached to the hub. (E) Immunostaining with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red) of a wild-type testis expressing GFP under the control of the bam promoter (bamP-GFP). GFP was visualized by direct fluorescence (in green). Regions corresponding to TA spermatogonial cells and spermatocytes are indicated. (F) Magnification of wild-type spermatocytes immunostained with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red). (G) Magnification of the transition from spermatocytes to round spermatids in a wild-type testis immunostained with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red). DNA was stained with DAPI (in blue). Scale bars correspond to 25 μm. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Bam Depletion Increases dBigH1 Expression in TA Spermatogonial Cells (A) Testes from control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bamRNAi males immunostained with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red) and, to label the contour of each cyst, with αArmadillo (Arm) antibodies (in green). Cysts containing >16 cells are indicated. (B) As in (A), but for individual GBs and 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-cell cysts. Several z sections are presented to visualize and count the total number of cells in the cysts as indicated. DNA was stained with DAPI (in blue). Scale bars correspond to 25 μm (A) and 6 μm (B). See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Bam Downregulates dBigH1 Expression (A) Immunostaining of the tip region with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red) and αArmadillo (Arm) antibodies (in green) of testes from nos > Bam::GFP males, in which expression of a Bam::GFP fusion was ectopically induced in GSCs and GBs with nos-GAL4. GFP was visualized by direct fluorescence (also in green). Arm antibodies mark the hub (arrowhead). DNA was stained with DAPI (in blue). (B) Immunostaining with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red) of testes in which expression of a control GFP construct (left) and a Bam::GFP fusion (right) was ectopically induced in early spermatocytes with chif-GAL4. GFP was visualized by direct fluorescence (in green). DNA was stained with DAPI (in white for better visualization). Primary spermatocytes showing faint DAPI staining and expressing GFP/Bam::GFP are indicated. (C) Immunostaining with αdBigH1 (in red) and αHA antibodies (in green) of the tip region of testes expressing a tagged dBigH1::HA construct under the control of the vasa promoter (vasaP) in control wild-type (left) and heterozygous bamΔ86 males (right). The TA region is indicated. DNA was stained with DAPI (in blue). Scale bars correspond to 25 μm. See also Figures S2 and S3. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 dBigH1 Depletion Affects GSC Maintenance and Differentiation (A) Immunostaining of testes from control nos-GAL4/+ and knockdown nos > bigH1RNAi males with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red), αAdducin (Add) antibodies to stain the fusome (in green), and αFasciclin III antibodies to mark the hub (also in green). In the nos > bigH1RNAi panel, a pair of testes is presented, of which one is strongly undeveloped (in the red box); the second testis is included for comparison. (B) Magnifications of the tip regions of the control nos-GAL4/+ testis in (A) and of two knockdown nos > bigH1RNAi testes. The nos > bigH1RNAi testis in the bottom panel corresponds to the one shown in (A) (red box). Notice the lack of GCs in the nos > bigH1RNAi testis in the center panel and the absence of fusome (stained with αAdd) in GCs of the nos > bigH1RNAi testis in the bottom panel. The positions of the TA region and the hub are indicated. (C) Percentage of testes showing a lack of GCs (no testis) or a drastic loss of GCs and lack of spermatocytes (undeveloped) in control nos-GAL4/+ (N = 100) and knockdown nos > bigH1RNAi males (N = 89). (D) Fertility tests of control nos-GAL4/+ and knockdown nos > bigH1RNAi males. The total progeny of single males of the indicated genotypes mated with single wild-type females is presented (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). DNA was stained with DAPI (in blue). Scale bars correspond to 100 μm (A) and 25 μm (B). Results correspond to bigH1RNAi line BL-38211 (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center). See also Figures S2, S4, and S5. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 dBigH1 Depletion Impairs Spermatocyte Differentiation (A) Immunostaining of testes from control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi males with αdBigH1 (in red). (B) Percentage of testes showing a severely enlarged TA region (as that shown in A) or mildly enlarged TA region (as that shown in D) in control bam-GAL4/+ (N = 103) and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi (N = 34) males. (C) Fertility tests of control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi males. The total progeny of single males of the indicated genotypes mated with single wild-type females is presented (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). (D) Immunostaining with αdBigH1 antibodies (in red) of testes from control and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi males expressing a Bam::GFP fused protein under the control of the bam promoter (bamP-Bam::GFP). GFP was visualized by direct fluorescence (in green). (E) Immunostaining of testes from control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi males with αdBigH1 (in red) and, to label the contour of each cyst, with αArmadillo (Arm) antibodies (in green). (F) Quantitative analysis of the results shown in (E). The percentages of cysts containing ≤8, 16, and ≥32 spermatocytes are presented for control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi testes (N = 12 testes analyzed per condition). DNA was stained with DAPI. The positions of the TA region are indicated. Scale bars correspond to 25 μm. Results correspond to bigH1RNAi line BL-38211 (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center). See also Figures S2, S4, and S6. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 dBigH1 Silences Gene Expression in Spermatocytes (A) Lorenz curves showing coverage inequality for IP and input samples of dBigH1 ChIP-seq analyses in precellular embryos (left) and testes (right). (B) The expression level in spermatocytes (log2RMA) is plotted as a function of the dBigH1 content (MAnorm log2fold change (FC) IP/input) for each gene. (C) Normalized dBigH1 log2 coverage ratio (IP/input) around the TSS is presented for genes of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd tertiles of dBigH1 content. (D) The expression levels of 11 genes with high dBigH1 content are determined by qRT-PCR in control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi testes. Expression levels were determined with respect to Act5C expression and normalized with respect to control. (E) dBigH1 occupancy at the bam promoter is determined by ChIP-qPCR in control bam-GAL4/+ and knockdown bam > bigH1RNAi testes. (F) The levels of dBigH1 in extracts prepared from control S2 cells (left) and stable S2 cells carrying a Cu2+-inducible dBigH1::FLAG construct (right) are determined by WB using αdBigH1 antibodies after induction with 1 mM CuSO4 (+) or not (−). αH4 antibodies are used for normalization. Increasing amounts of extracts are analyzed (lanes 1 and 2). (G) dBigH1 expression was induced in a stable S2 cell line carrying a dBigH1::FLAG construct. At the left, dBigH1 occupancy at the bam promoter is determined by ChIP-qPCR after inducing dBigH1 expression and in control uninduced cells. In the right, bam mRNA levels are determined by qRT-PCR after inducing dBigH1 expression and in control uninduced cells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 2). See also Figures S6 and S7 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 dBigH1 and Bam Form a Double-Repressor Loop that Regulates Entrance into Spermatocyte Differentiation Bam accumulation during the TA divisions represses dBigH1 expression post-transcriptionally, while dBigH1 is required to silence bam transcription in spermatocytes. This forms a double-repressor loop that is required for spermatocyte differentiation. Bam expression begins when GBs leave the niche, in which Dpp/BMP signals repress bam in GSCs. Then, Bam progressively accumulates during the TA divisions, inhibiting dBigH1 expression. After reaching a maximum at the 8-cell stage, Bam levels decrease by the action of several post-transcriptional mechanisms. Consequently, dBigH1 expression resumes reinforcing transcriptional silencing of bam, which is required to enter the spermatocyte differentiation program (see text for details). Cell Reports 2017 21, 3178-3189DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.060) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions