NG Technician Performance Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

Head teacher Performance Management
Welcome to the Writing Performance Plan Elements & Standards Workshop.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) PROCESS INFORMATION SESSION NON-SUPERVISOR For more information, visit
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Performance Management Review FAQs
Introduction Performance Appraisal Application (PAA) Demonstration Training Introduction Fall 2014.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
Developing Performance Goals That Work For You and ANR Performance Training and Workshop for County Directors November 1, 2013.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Appraisal System Update
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
Writing Effective Self Assessments
Five-Level Performance Management System. Caveat for Bargaining Unit Employees The following presentation is intended for: – Non-bargaining unit employees.
INCENTIVE AWARDS The National Guard Incentive Awards Program is designed to motivate technicians of the National Guard to increase productivity and creativity.
Cover Page - Currently in Graphics Being Designed
Performance Appraisal 2013 Guidelines – April 2013.
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO The National Guard Performance Appraisal Application (PAA) Supervisor Training This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Joint Force Headquarters.
1 Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats.
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
12/7/20151 TECHNICIAN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM TRAINING Maine Human Resource Regulation (MeHRR) March 2010.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
The National Guard Performance Appraisal Application PAA Supervisor Training Joint Force Headquarters - NY National Guard Federal Human Resource.
HR Elements for HR Practitioners 1 Lesson 7: Performance Management Duration: 1 hour, 30 minutes Performance Management Slide 7- 1.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO The National Guard Performance Appraisal Application (PAA) PAA Supervisor Training This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Joint Force Headquarters.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING SHRA Employee Annual Performance Appraisal Program.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
2017 Performance Management Changes
Supervisor’s Guide for Employees in Professional Series
Roll-out of the NORTHRAIL PMS
Butler University Goal and Performance System (GPS) Human Resources
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Feedback/Performance Review and Compensation Process
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Performance Management System
Civilian Performance Program Comparison
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
TOPS TSA MD
Performance Evaluation
Five-Level Performance Management System
T.O.P.S
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Introducing the National Guard Performance Appraisal Application (PAA)
Lesson 3 Planning Performance
Monitoring Performance
Performance Management System
Lesson 6: Evaluating Performance
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
NG Technician Performance Management SSG Brooke Goldsberry
Missouri National Guard Federal Employees Incentive Awards Program
Performance Review for County Educators
NG Technician Performance Management
HIGHLIGHTS on the DoD Performance Management and Appraisal Program (DPMAP) Instruction: Welcome to the introduction to the DoD Performance Management and.
Missouri National Guard Federal Employees Incentive Awards Program
Employee Performance Management System
STAFFING SECTION CAROL OTTO
Performance Review for County Educators
STAFFING SECTION CAROL OTTO
Performance Management Training
Human Resources Office, Naples
Human Resources & Personnel Management
Presentation transcript:

NG Technician Performance Management Missouri National Guard Technician Supervisor Course

NGB Technician Performance Appraisal Program Regulation (TPR) 430,Effective 5 Nov 2009 Performance Management Performance Appraisal Program Requirements Performance Plan/Interim Review/Appraisal Performance Application Tool (PAA) Writing Effective Critical Elements Writing Effective Self Assessments 12/7/2018

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT A well-written performance plan is an effective management tool. Allows the performance management system to work for you, the individual and the organization. Gives you the ability to deal effectively with performance problems when they come up. A well utilized performance plan facilitates the equal and fair management of all employees. Ensures technician has clear understanding of critical elements and required standards for meeting successful mission. 12/7/2018

OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Meaningful and efficient method to evaluate the individual and organizational performance Planning, monitoring, developing and evaluating performance Indentify accountability for accomplishments Encourage technicians employee involvement and to take responsibility to continuously improve performance, support team endeavors, develop professionally and perform at full potential How do we accomplish this on the federal servant side for fulltime employees of the Missouri National Guard? - By establishing expectations of the employee in writing with a Technician Performance Plan (TPP) - Evaluating the technician’s work performance on a regular basis 12/7/2018

Performance Management Five Rating Level Evaluation Method applied to other related regulations, including but not limited to: Within Grade Increase Incentive Awards Reassignments Reductions in Grade or Removals Promotions Reduction in Force TPR 430, National Guard Technician Performance Appraisal Program: Requires all States to comply with the new TPR 430, the Five Rating Level Evaluation Method Appraisal Cycle: Annually 1 October – 30 September New Terms: some examples – PAA – Performance Appraisal Application Tool Summary Level Pattern: 5 Levels (Level 1 = Unacceptable; thru Level 5 = Outstanding) One Mandatory Interim Review: documented in the Performance Appraisal Application Tool Mandatory Supervisory Critical Element Close Out Assessments: Narrative assessment used in the final annual rating of record. New NGB Form 430, Performance Appraisal: electronically generated in DCPDS, MyBiz/MyWorkplace 12/7/2018

Performance Appraisal Rating Period Annual Appraisal Cycle: 1 Oct – 30 Sep New Hire Technician has one year Trial/Probationary rating period from date of hire thru 365 days. EXAMPLE: 12 Nov 2016 thru 11 Nov 2017 Next rating period 12 Nov 2017 thru 30 Sep 2018 Minimum period of performance is 120 days under an approved Performance Plan. DoD 1400.25-M, SC430.AP1.4.4. Appraisal Periods ---SC430.AP1.4.4.1. Performance appraisal programs shall establish an official appraisal period during which performance shall be monitored and for which a rating of record shall be prepared. The programs shall generally designate appraisal periods so that employees shall be provided a rating of record on an annual basis. TPR 430, para 2-1 states: “The appraisal period will be on an annual basis with the appraisal year; normally October 1 through September 30 each year.” *States have the flexibility to establish another appraisal period after negotiating with their bargaining unit. DoD 1400.25-M, SC430.AP1.4.9. Summary Level --- SC430.AP1.4.9.1. Each performance appraisal program shall provide a method for deriving and assigning a summary level from one, and only one, of the following patterns based on appraisal of performance on critical elements and, where applicable, non-critical elements New Term: PAA – Performance Appraisal Application Tool Employee Self Assessment Rating Official Assessment Higher Level Reviewer Critical Element is called Job Objective 12/7/2018

Performance Appraisal Rating Period Periods during which an employee is in a non-pay status (leave without pay, absence without leave) do not apply toward the 120 day period. Permanent, Indefinite and Term-Temporary technician only. Temporary technicians hired for 365 days or less do not receive performance appraisals. 12/7/2018

Trail/Probationary Period New Technicians are carefully observed and appraised during this period. For retention beyond this period, the technician’s work performance must be minimal rating of Fully Successful (Level 3). If retention is not recommended, supporting documentation must be forwarded to HR who will advise supervisors of appropriate action(s) to remove the technician from federal service. 12/7/2018

Trail/Probationary Period Initiation of a written removal action may be effected any time during a trial/probationary period. Recommend contacting HRO no later than the 9th month. If supervisors waits too late the technician cannot be removed for a performance less than fully successful. Technician serving Trial/Probationary Period will not be given an official performance appraisal until after completing 12 months of service. 12/7/2018

Procedures for Technician on Detail or Temporary Promotion covering 120 days or more Technician detailed or on temporary promotion to another position, either with the same or with a different supervisor, a written performance plan must be established for the position before the detail starts. Gaining supervisor shall complete annual rating of record considering the closeout assessment of losing supervisor. 12/7/2018

Procedure for Detail or Temporary Promotion 120 days or less Short term detail or temporary promotion the annual rating of record is completed by the supervisor/rater of permanent position. Must consider the closeout assessment completed by the temporary supervisor. 12/7/2018

Postponement of Annual Rating of Record Supervisor or technician is newly-assigned (less than 120 days). Technician has not been performing the regular assigned work because of extended detail or absence. Technician is absent at the end of a rating period due to a work related injury. 12/7/2018

Postponement of Annual Rating of Record If technician has not worked under an approved performance plan for at least 120 calendar days the Postponement should not be extended any longer than necessary to permit 120 calendar days under the performance plan. If technician is deployed, technician’s last rating of record will be used for official purposes until the technician returns to duty and is observed for at least 120 calendar days under an approved performance plan. 12/7/2018

Performance Plan Align Performance Plan with Strategic Goals. Performance expectation include goals or objectives that set general or specific targets at the individual, team and/or organizational level. Organizational, occupational, or other work requirements, such as standard operating procedures, operating instructions, manuals, internal rules and directives, and/or other instructions that are generally applicable and available to the employee Performance Plan should support and align with the DoD Mission and its strategic goals, organizational program and policy objectives, 12/7/2018

Performance Plan Particular work assignments, responsibilities or other instructions may be used to amplify performance expectations. Work assignments may specify the quality, quantity, accuracy, timeliness, or other expected characteristics of the completed assignment. Position description, mission and goals are used to establish critical elements. 12/7/2018

Develop and Communicate Performance Plans Communication between supervisor and employee is critical to the success of the performance management program. Performance expectations and year-to-date process should be subject of discussions throughout the year. At least one documented interim review is required. 12/7/2018

Performance Plan Performance expectations will be communicated to the employee in writing within 30 days from start of the rating period, entrance of duty of a new employee, or employee job change. Each job objective has to be performed for 120 days before end of rating period. 12/7/2018

Performance Plan Employees are always accountable for demonstrating professionalism and standards of appropriate conduct and behavior, such as civility and respect for others. Performance expectations even if not stated as a critical element include general behavioral expectations for all employees as stated in the Standards of Ethical Conduct. 12/7/2018

Requirements for Critical Elements Critical elements must be linked to the mission Minimum of 2 critical elements and maximum of 10 critical elements; key responsibilities captured critical elements to define performance expectations Mandatory Supervisory Critical Elements Critical elements may be weighted by supervisor or the PAA system will weight equally Communicate Expected Results Focus on the results and contribution for the current rating period Describe “what” the person will accomplish during that current rating period Employee responsible for outcome 12/7/2018

Develop Critical Elements Using the SMART Format SMART is a framework for developing (and evaluating) Critical Elements Specific Measurable Aligned Realistic/Relevant Timed 12/7/2018

Performance Application Tool (PAA) Web-based tool that supports the performance planning and appraisal process Documented on automated NGB Form 430 Journal Page Tracking System for NG Agency, NGB and DOD Performance Plan Interim Review Performance Appraisal 12/7/2018

INTERIM REVIEW Completed by end of March every rating period. Mandatory for Supervisor Not mandatory for Employee but is highly encouraged by management. Employee completes Interim Review Self assessment based on accomplishments, challenges, failures, etc. to First Line Supervisor. Supervisor should remind employees to complete self assessment and set a suspense to get it completed and sent to you. 12/7/2018

Employee’s Self Assessment using the STAR Form Situation: Describe the conditions under which you achieved your critical elements. Task: Describe what you did during the year to create the results you achieved. Action/Activity: Include additional activities you completed, or actions you took that contributed to your results. Result: Describe what you accomplished. Situation: Describe the conditions under which you achieved your critical elements. What was the situation I faced? Task: Describe what you did during the year to create the results you achieved. What was/were my tasks in that situation? Activity: Include additional activities you completed that contributed to your results. What action(s) did I take? Remember the characteristics of significant assignments: Difficult, Controversial, One of a Kind, First Time, High Visibility, Large Volume of Work, Short Deadlines, Competing Priorities, Require Innovation, Scope and Impact Result: Describe what you accomplished. What result did my action produce? 12/7/2018

Weighting Critical Elements Each critical element may be weighted to indicate importance and effort Weighting is minimum 10% and increased in increments of 5% At the end of the performance cycle, the percentages are multiplied to the individual objectives’ rating to produce the overall performance rating If values aren’t entered, all critical elements are weighted equally Critical Element 1 — 35% Critical Element 2 — 20% Critical Element 3 — 15% Critical Element 4 — 15% Critical Element 5 — 15% Total Weighting = 100% 12/7/2018

Weighted Critical Elements Employee 1 rating for each CE   Employee 2 rating for each CE Weight Employee 2 Rating after weighted. Ex1 Rating Adj. Rating 1 3 10.00% 0.30 2 25.00% 0.75 65.00% 1.95 3.00 100.00% Ex2 4 10% 0.40 25% 0.50 5 65% 3.25 3.67 100% 4.15 Ex3 1.00 1.30 3.33 2.70 Ex4 2.67 2.35 Underwriters Laboratory: Will “Test a product until it breaks”: This slide illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of weighting critical elements. Employees 1 and 2 have the same critical elements, and received the same rating for each element. The only difference is, Employee 2's critical elements were weighted. If the rating is “X.50” the score stays at the same rating level. If the rating is “X.51” the score is adjusted up to the next rating level. Example 1: Both employee receive a Level 3 rating Example 2: Employee 1 = Adj. Level 4 rating/Employee 2 = Adj. Level 4 rating Example 3: Employee 1 = Adj. Level 3 rating/Employee 2 = Adj. Level 3 rating Example 4: Shows where an employee would be disadvantaged if their critical elements alone were weighted in comparison to their counterparts whose critical elements were not weighted. Example 4: Employee 1 = Adj. Level 3 rating/Employee 2 = Adj. Level 2 rating 12/7/2018

Supervisors - Monitor Performance For each technician: Engage in dialogue concerning performance Conduct one or more documented interim reviews Maintain performance information Update critical elements and performance standards if they change Anticipate and address performance deficiancies Reinforce effective behavior 12/7/2018

Supervisor Self Assessment Must prepare a written assessment that captures the technicians accomplishments or lack there of, for each critical element. Supports the appraisal rating that is given to each critical element. 12/7/2018

Performance Appraisal Rating Summary Pattern: Level 1 thru Level 5 5 - Outstanding 4 - Excellent 3 - Fully Successful 2 - Marginal 1 - Unacceptable 12/7/2018

Properly Monitoring Performance Marginal level 2 allows supervisor to deny within grade increase. Level 1 rating of record does not need to be formally assigned to the employee in order to address performance deficiency Reinforce strengths and correcting weaknesses Encourage employees to seek professional and technical training opportunities to enhance the individual and organizational goals as appropriate 12/7/2018

Performance Deficiencies Non-probationary period employee Provide proactive assistance anytime throughout the rating period For technician who is performing at or below the Level 2 – marginal rating. Counseling, increased supervisory assistance, additional training etc. 12/7/2018

Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Contact HR for guidance Technician advised in writing and placed on a formal Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Period of 90-120 days Provide document of instances of unacceptable performance and state specifically what must be accomplished to perform above the level 2 rating. 12/7/2018

Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Can refer to Employee Assistance Program (EAP) a voluntary program. If performance continues below level 2 rating in any one critical element, then technician is advised of reassigned, reduced in grade, or removed from employment. Must give 30 day notice 12/7/2018

QUESTIONS? 12/7/2018