Generation and Interconversion of Multiple Distinct Nucleosomal States as a Mechanism for Catalyzing Chromatin Fluidity  Geeta J. Narlikar, Michael L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Akhilesh K Nagaich, Dawn A Walker, Ron Wolford, Gordon L Hager 
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Santosh K. Dasika, Kalyan C. Vinnakota, Daniel A. Beard 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
Division of Labor in an Oligomer of the DEAD-Box RNA Helicase Ded1p
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages e9 (February 2018)
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Capping Protein Increases the Rate of Actin-Based Motility by Promoting Filament Nucleation by the Arp2/3 Complex  Orkun Akin, R. Dyche Mullins  Cell 
Factor Xa Binding to Phosphatidylserine-Containing Membranes Produces an Inactive Membrane-Bound Dimer  Tilen Koklic, Rinku Majumder, Gabriel E. Weinreb,
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Keehwan Kwon, Yu Lin Jiang, James T. Stivers  Chemistry & Biology 
NAD+-Dependent Modulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription by Nucleosome Binding Properties of PARP-1  Mi Young Kim, Steven Mauro, Nicolas Gévry,
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Use of Helper Enzymes for ADP Removal in Infrared Spectroscopic Experiments: Application to Ca2+-ATPase  Man Liu, Eeva-Liisa Karjalainen, Andreas Barth 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Xuetong Shen, Ryan Ranallo, Eugene Choi, Carl Wu  Molecular Cell 
Zoltan Maliga, Tarun M Kapoor, Timothy J Mitchison  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Covalent Modification Regulates Ligand Binding to Receptor Complexes in the Chemosensory System of Escherichia coli  Guoyong Li, Robert M. Weis  Cell 
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages e9 (February 2018)
DNA Unwinding Is the Primary Determinant of CRISPR-Cas9 Activity
Modeling of the RAG Reaction Mechanism
Chul-Hwan Lee, Jun Wu, Bing Li  Molecular Cell 
Rinat Nahum-Levy, Dafna Lipinski, Sara Shavit, Morris Benveniste 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Importance of a Single Base Pair for Discrimination between Intron-Containing and Intronless Alleles by Endonuclease I-BmoI  David R. Edgell, Matthew.
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Ali Hamiche, Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, David A Gdula, Carl Wu  Cell 
Jachen A. Solinger, Konstantin Kiianitsa, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Characterization of a Specificity Factor for an AAA+ ATPase
Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase Activity by Mispaired DNA Induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) State Capable of Hydrolysis-Independent Movement along DNA  Dan J. Mazur,
Presentation transcript:

Generation and Interconversion of Multiple Distinct Nucleosomal States as a Mechanism for Catalyzing Chromatin Fluidity  Geeta J. Narlikar, Michael L. Phelan, Robert E. Kingston  Molecular Cell  Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 1219-1230 (December 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9

Figure 1 Quantification of ATPase and Remodeling Activities of BRG1 and Substrate Binding (A) Top, TLC analysis of ATPase reactions (20 μM ATP/Mg, 1 nM BRG1, saturating nucleosomes, or TPT DNA). Bottom, quantification of the data in the top panel showing unstimulated (open squares), nucleosome-stimulated (closed circles), and DNA-stimulated (open circles) ATPase activity of BRG1. (B) A schematic of TPT, the 157-bp DNA fragment used to reconstitute mononucleosomes. (C) BRG1 increases restriction enzyme cleavage of nucleosomal DNA (15 nM BRG1 and <1 nM nucleosomes). Top, uncut and cut DNA resolved on a gel. Bottom, quantification of the data in the top panel. The rate constants are 4.4 × 10−5 min−1 (open circles, without ATP) and 9.7 × 10−2 min−1 (closed circles, with ATP). (D) An increasing fraction of DNA is retained on the top nitrocellulose membrane upon increasing [BRG1]. Unbound DNA is retained on the bottom, positively charged membrane. Fits to the data give a Kd for TPT DNA of 0.5 nM ([TPT] = 0.02 nM). (E) Nucleosomes displace TPT from BRG1. This is manifested as a decrease in the fraction of DNA retained on the top membrane. The average Kd for nucleosomes (19 nM) using data such as those supplied here is given in Table 1. Molecular Cell 2001 8, 1219-1230DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9)

Figure 2 The Individual Steps in Nucleosome Remodeling by BRG1 (A) A pulse-chase experiment. The addition of chase (2 mM ATP/Mg, excess cold nucleosomes [220 nM] and excess PstI) after allowing 32P-labeled nucleosomes (<1 nM) to bind BRG1 (40 nM) decreases the cleavage rate (closed diamonds) compared to reactions without chase (closed circles), suggesting that nucleosomes fall off faster than they are remodeled. The effectiveness of the chase is demonstrated by the simultaneous addition of chase and 32P-labeled nucleosomes (open squares). (B) Kinetic and thermodynamic scheme for nucleosome remodeling. The framework is drawn for Model 1 (see “BRG1 Continuously Generates Multiple Remodeled Products”). The kinetic and thermodynamic constants are the averages of numbers from Tables 1 and 2, except for kremodel, which is derived from the section mentioned above. The Kd values are assumed to equal the respective Km values (see the main text). The lower limit for koffN, the rate constant for the dissociation of nucleosomes from BRG1/ATP, is based on the result that nucleosomes equilibrate with BRG1/ATP faster than ATP hydrolysis, which is rate limiting. The lower limit for the value of koffATP is analogously obtained from the result that ATP binding is not rate limiting in the ATPase reaction. The lower limit for konN is obtained from koffN and KdN (Table 1), and that for konATP from koffATP and KdATP. Molecular Cell 2001 8, 1219-1230DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9)

Figure 3 Investigating the Formation of Multiple Remodeled Products Using DNase I (A) Two extreme models for BRG1 action. Also see the Supplementary Material. (B) The generation of the altered DNase I pattern is complete by 6.5 min. The rate constants from quantification of the given bands are shown. The “rungs” of the 10-bp ladder that are closest to the bands being quantified are marked with letters. (C) Quantification of band 6 (normalized signal, closed circles) in (B) is shown and is the average of two independent experiments. The REA reaction with PstI continuously present is also shown (fraction uncut nucleosomes, open circles). Both reactions have identical BRG1, nucleosome, and ATP concentrations. Molecular Cell 2001 8, 1219-1230DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9)

Figure 4 Investigating the Formation of Multiple Remodeled Products Using Different Restriction Enzymes (A) Remodeling at different DNA sites (2 mM ATP/Mg and 18 nM BRG1). The rate constants for BRG1-enhanced cleavage by XhoI (squares), PstI (circles), SpeI (triangles), and all three enzymes together (diamonds) are 0.015 min−1, 0.097 min−1, 0.028 min−1, and 0.2 min−1, respectively. (B) Remodeling of a PstI site in the same position as in the TPT fragment (Figure 1B) (circles, rate constant = 0.08 min−1) compared with remodeling of the PstI site moved to replace the original XhoI site (squares, rate constant = 0.01 min−1). Reactions contained 2 mM ATP/Mg and ∼34 nM BRG1. (C) Determination of the fraction of PstI- and XhoI-accessible products. After allowing BRG1 (13 nM) to remodel 32P-labeled nucleosomes (<1 nM) for 40 min with 2 mM ATP/Mg, PstI (circles), XhoI (squares), or PstI and XhoI together (diamonds) were added, giving rate constants of cleavage of ∼4–8 min−1 and endpoints of 26%, 15%, and 38% cut nucleosomes, respectively, after including the 5% background cleavage. With PstI continuously present in a parallel reaction, ∼80% of the nucleosomes are cleaved, as indicated by the dashed line. (D) Approximately 15 nM BRG1 was allowed to react with nucleosomes for varying times, t1, before the removal of aliquots and the addition of PstI to a final concentration of 1 U/μl for 30 s (closed circles). Approximately 20% of PstI-accessible states are generated with a rate constant of 0.32 min−1. In a parallel reaction performed under the same BRG1 and nucleosome conditions, except for the continuous presence of PstI, the rate constant for PstI cleavage was 0.048 min−1 (open circles). Molecular Cell 2001 8, 1219-1230DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9)

Figure 5 Human SWI/SNF Displays the Same Fundamental Mechanistic Features as BRG1 (A) Measuring the rate constant for remodeling as observed via DNase I. The experiment was performed as in Figure 3B, using ∼65 ng/μl hSWI/SNF. (B) Band 6 (normalized signal, closed circles) in (A) is generated with a rate constant of 1.6 min−1. The REA reaction with PstI continuously present (fraction uncut substrate, open circles) has a rate constant of 0.14 min−1. Both reactions have identical hSWI/SNF, nucleosome, and ATP concentrations. (C) Determination of the fraction of PstI-accessible states and the rate constant with which they are generated. The experiment was performed as in Figure 4D, using 60 ng/μL hSWI/SNF. Approximately 22% of PstI-accessible states are generated with a rate constant of 0.7 min−1 (closed circles). In a parallel reaction performed under the same hSWI/SNF and nucleosome conditions, except for the continuous presence of PstI, the rate constant for PstI cleavage was 0.12 min−1 (open circles). Molecular Cell 2001 8, 1219-1230DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9)

Figure 6 Model for How Remodeling by SWI/SNF Can Create DNA Access to Repressors and Activators Molecular Cell 2001 8, 1219-1230DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00412-9)