ESS 200C Substorms Lecture 14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres
Advertisements

DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND PROPERTIES OF THE Dst INDEX R.L. McPherron Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
IMF Bx influence on the magnetotail neutral sheet geometry and dynamics E. Gordeev, M. Amosova, V. Sergeev Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg,
Occurrence and properties of substorms associated with pseudobreakups Anita Kullen Space & Plasma Physics, EES.
Identification and Analysis of Magnetic Substorms Patricia Gavin 1, Sandra Brogl 1, Ramon Lopez 2, Hamid Rassoul 1 1. Florida Institute of Technology,
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Observation and Theory of Substorm Onset C. Z. (Frank) Cheng (1,2), T. F. Chang (2), Sorin Zaharia (3), N. N. Gorelenkov (4) (1)Plasma and Space Science.
1 Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Models NASA/GSFC, Code 692 During the early part of April 6, 2000 a large coronal “ejecta” event compressed and interacted with.
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group The formation of transpolar arcs R. C. Fear and S. E. Milan University of Leicester.
ESS 7 Lectures 10, 11 and 12 October 22, 24, and 27 The Magnetosphere.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
A. Kullen (1), L. Rosenqvist (1), and G. Marklund (2) (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
Space Weather: Magnetic Storms 31 October 2011 William J. Burke Air Force Research Laboratory/Space Vehicles Directorate Boston College Institute for Scientific.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
V. M. Mishin and V. V. Mishin, Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics RAS, Irkutsk Substorms on the Earth and Flares on the Sun: the examples of analogies.
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Ionospheric Current and Aurora CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 12 Spring 2007 April 24, 2007 References: Prolss: Chap , P (main) Tascione: Chap.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Recent THEMIS and coordinated GBO measurements of substorm expansion onset: Do we finally have an answer? Larry Kepko NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.
Energy conversion at Saturn’s magnetosphere: from dayside reconnection to kronian substorms Dr. Caitríona Jackman Uppsala, May 22 nd 2008.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © Magnetosphere: Geomagnetic Activties Nov. 5, 2009.
PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING PHYSICS The Disruption Zone Model of Magnetospheric Substorms George Sofko, Kathryn McWilliams, Chad Bryant I SuperDARN 2011 Workshop,
GEOSYNCHRONOUS SIGNATURES OF AURORAL SUBSTORMS PRECEDED BY PSEUDOBREAKUPS A. Kullen (1), S. Ohtani (2), and H. Singer (3) A. Kullen (1), S. Ohtani (2),
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
PARTICLES IN THE MAGNETOSPHERE
Mass Transport: To the Plasma Sheet – and Beyond!
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
Magnetospheric Current System During Disturbed Times.
The effects of the solar wind on Saturn’s space environment
Particle precipitation has been intensely studied by ionospheric and magnetospheric physicists. As particles bounce along the earth's magnetic fields they.
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
Lecture 15 Modeling the Inner Magnetosphere. The Inner Magnetosphere The inner magnetosphere includes the ring current made up of electrons and ions in.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Wave Coupling as Revealed in Swarm Plasma Densities and Drifts Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University.
High-latitude Neutral Density Maxima
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
W. D. Cramer1, J. Raeder1, F. R. Toffoletto2, M. Gilson1,3, B. Hu2,4
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Date Day Topic Instructor Due
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Introduction to Space Weather
Principles of Global Modeling
Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction: Reconnection and IMF Dependence
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Subauroral heliosphere-geosphere coupling during November 2004 ionospheric storms: F2-region, North-East Asia Chelpanov M. A., Zolotukhina N.A. Institute.
Magnetosphere: Bow Shock Substorm and Storm
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
Dynamic Coupling between the Magnetosphere and the Ionosphere
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
Determination of the Substorm Initiation Region From a Major Conjunction Interval of THEMIS Satellites A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel,
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Magnetosphere: Structure and Properties
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

ESS 200C Substorms Lecture 14

Soon after the auroral substorm was discovered in 1964 the search began to find the corresponding changes in the magnetosphere and the solar wind. The auroral activity is associated with currents in the ionosphere which create magnetic field changes. Much of the effort in studying substorms has been to define the solar-wind coupling parameters that can be used to predict the strength of magnetic activity. Most approaches have treated the problem as though the magnetosphere was a deterministic system driven by the solar wind. Only about half of the variance can be accounted for that way. The residual is related to discrete events in which energy stored in the magnetosphere is suddenly released - the magnetospheric substorm.

Magnetic coordinates is the magnetic field vector, F is the magnitude of the magnetic field. X is northward, Y is eastward, and Z completes a right handed system toward the center of the Earth. The magnitude of the vector projected onto the horizontal plane is called H. This projection makes an angle D (for declination) with positive from north to the east. The dip angle I (for inclination) is the angle that the total field vector makes with respect to the horizontal plane and is positive for vectors below the plane.

On quiet days, every midlatitude observatory records a systematic variation in each field component. Stations at the same magnetic latitude but at different longitudes see the same pattern delayed by the Earth’s rotation. The pattern is symmetric with respect to the magnetic equator and noon suggesting an ionospheric current fixed with respect to the Sun.

The currents responsible for the diurnal variation. Two cells of current circulate around foci located at about 300 magnetic latitude. At the equator the currents flow from dawn to dusk.This is called the equatorial electrojet. The SQ currents are caused by a dynamo in which electric charges in the ionosphere move across the Earth’s magnetic field. The motion is driven by winds in the ionosphere. The winds are driven primarily by solar heating.

Over the past two centuries over 500 magnetic observatories have been established. Data from so many sources is difficult to handle. Indices have been generated to organize these observations. The primary sources of ground magnetic disturbances during substorms are the electrojets and the substorm current wedge. The sources of the midlatitude storm time variations (Dst) are the magnetopause current, the ring current and the partial ring current.

Magnetic perturbations in the H component observed by auroral-zone observatories. Positive perturbations are produced by a concentrated current (called an auroral elecrojet) flowing eastward. They are observed by stations in the afternoon or evening. Negative perturbations are produced by a westward electrojet. They are observed near and past midnight. These currents flow at ~120km altitude and are carried by auroral particles. The positive and negative envelopes give the AU and AL indices.

There are solar cycle variations in geomagnetic activity. The top panel shows the AA index, the first difference time series of daily mean H at midlatitudes. The bottom shows the sunspot number. The pattern holds for both yearly and monthly averages. There is an annual variation of geomagnetic activity. There are two annual peaks in the u1 index (the difference between successive daily means in the H component of a station normalized so that the index has the same distribution as the sunspot number). The two peaks are in March and October.

Magnetic activity occurs preferentially when the IMF is southward relative to the dipole axis. Activity increases with the size of the southward component. Russell and McPherron proposed that the semi-annual variation in activity is controlled by the projection of the cross flow component of the IMF onto the cross flow component of the Earth’s dipole magnetic field. At the spring and fall equinoxes the Earth’s dipole axis makes the largest possible angle, ~350 with respect to the ecliptic normal. At these times the IMF at the boundary will have a component Geomagnetic activity also varies with solar rotation. This variation is closely related to magnetic storms and will be discussed in the last lecture.

Correlation analysis between the auroral-electrojet index AE (difference between the envelop of positive -AU- and negative -AL- magnetic perturbations at auroral latitudes) and five solar wind parameters (u, n, B, Bn, Bs) Bn is hourly average of the BzGSM magnetic field when BzGSM>0. Bs is hourly average of the BzGSM magnetic field when BzGSM<0. Activity peaks in Bs for the hour prior to the hour when the activity was measured. AL/v2 as a function of Bs (Bz<0) and Bn (Bz>0). No dependence on Bn but strong dependence on Bs

The recovery phase is the return of the system to its ground state. The magnetic perturbations during the growth phase result from increased ionospheric currents. The expansion phase corresponds to the release and unloading of the stored energy. The recovery phase is the return of the system to its ground state. Many phenomena precede the onset of the expansion phase in the aurora. Weak positive and negative signatures (called bays) are observed in the H component at auroral zone stations. Gradual increase of the size of the polar cap. McPherron interpreted these phenomena as the growth phase of the substorm. Energy extracted from the solar wind is stored in the magnetosphere. The initial interval of slowly growing AU and AL. The growth phase usually lasts 30 minutes to one hour.

A new current system forms during the substorm expansion phase. The field aligned part of the current has the sense of the region 1 currents (away from the Earth on the dusk side and toward the Earth on the dawn side). In the tail this current flows in the sense to reduce the cross magnetosphere current (sometimes called current disruption). In the ionosphere the current fiows westward (the auroral electrojet). The magnetic field changes at midlatitudes corresponding to this current system are northward about midnight, eastward and northward in the local evening and westward and northward in the morning. The “wedge” is typically about 700 wide. That similar changes are seen at synchronous orbit indicates that this system closes in the magnetosphere.

The best developed model of the substorm sequence is called the near-Earth neutral line model (NENL). (a) The initial (“ground”) state. Three types of field lines. Open with one end in the solar wind and one in the Earth. Open field lines form the polar cap. Closed with both ends closing in the Earth. Interplanetary field lines with both ends closing at the Sun. At night the boundary between open and closed field lines extends to a preexisting tail x-line called the “distant” x-line (not shown). The “gray” region of closed field lines contains the plasma sheet. At the earthward boundary of the plasma sheet the field rapidly becomes dipolar. The inner edge of the plasma sheet is roughly at 10RE depending on the electric field. The plasmasphere and radiation belts are earthward of the inner edge of the plasma sheet.

(b) A southward turning of the IMF initiates or increases dayside reconnection. Magnetic flux from the Earth connects to the IMF and is transported over the polar caps into the lobes. This causes increased convection in the plasma sheet but this is limited by the finite conductivity of the ionosphere at the foot of the field lines. The return flow in the magnetosphere is unable to return flux to the dayside as fast as it is removed. The dayside magnetopause is eroded. Dayside erosion increases magnetopause flaring and increases the pressure on the boundary. The magnetosphere is compressed until the increased magnetic pressure in the lobes balances the new pressure. This increases the pressure on the plasma sheet and increased flow toward the Earth causes the plasma sheet to thin. Increased drag on the magnetotail caused by newly opened field lines is balanced by the tail current moving earthward. This causes even more thinning of the plasma sheet.

The energy input from the solar wind compared with the Joule heating rate in the ionosphere. The energy input rate is -uxBz of the solar wind times the assumed 7RE width of the reconnection region on the magnetopause. The energy output rate is the sum of the ring current energy injection rate, the Joule heating rate and auroral particle energy flux. The Joule heating rate starts to increase gradually during the growth phase but increases sharply about one hour later during the expansion phase.

Some time during the late growth phase the vertical component of the magnetic field across the plasma sheet becomes very small and reconnection begins on closed field lines in the near-Earth plasma sheet. The reconnection is slow at first. As closed field lines are cut they reconnect to form a magnetic O region called a plasmoid (technically a magnetic flux rope). This stage of the substorm continues until the last closed field line is severed by the reconnection process. The reconnection rate increases during the late growth phase.

The severed plasmoid leaves the magnetotail. When the last closed field line is severed the reconnection rate becomes explosive. This is the onset of the expansion phase of the substorm. The current “wedge” is thought to occur at this time. The energy dissipation increases. 20%-30% of the open magnetic flux stored in the tail lobes is rapidly reconnected. This is the principal energy conversion process during substorms. The severed plasmoid leaves the magnetotail. If the reconnection fails to reach the lobe field lines the disturbance is quenched. This is called a pseudobreakup.

The reconnection of open field lines also forms closed field lines earthward of the X-line. Eventually the balance of forces in the plasma sheet changes and the X-line begins to move tailward. Earthward of the X-line the plasma sheet thickens and strong earthward flows are observed. As the X-line moves toward its distant location, the currents and aurora begin to die at the lower edge of the auroral bulge. This is the beginning of the recovery phase. In time all the disturbances die away, the substorm is over, and the magnetosphere returns to its ground state.

All of the changes in the magnetospheric configuration are coupled. In recent years global magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the solar wind, magnetosphere, ionosphere system have been used to self-consistently model the substorm process. Magnetic field lines crossing the equator following a southward turning of the IMF. a.) At 60 minutes after the southward turning the plasma sheet is thinning. b.) At ~75 minutes reconnection has started on closed plasma sheet field lines. c.) At ~90 minutes reconnection has started on lobe field lines d.) At ~105 minutes new IMF field lines drape over the plasmoid. The combination of magnetic tension and pressure gradients move the plasmoid tailward

The NENL model has been quite successful in reproducing the observations from space. There is considerable evidence for dayside reconnection and the enhancement of the magnetic field in the tail lobes. The earthward and tailward flows from the reconnection have been observed. However rather than being a global phenomenon these frequently show evidence of being localized in space and time. The most probable location of the NENL is -20RE>x>-30RE The mean time of start of earthward and tailward flow is the substorm onset.

The plasmoids usually in the form of magnetic flux ropes have been observed moving tailward. Flux rope plasmoids are formed when reconnection occurs in the presence of an IMF BY. Currents flow along the axis of the flux rope. In some cases they may be force free ( ). A tailward moving flux rope will have a characteristic bipolar signature in Bz (an increase followed by a decrease) The fine dashed line shows the results from a theoretical flux rope moving tailward. The heavy dashed line shows the results from a flux rope simulation.

There is evidence that the substorm begins near the Earth (7RE - 8RE) rather than in the near-Earth plasma sheet. The expansion phase begins with brightening of the equator-most auroral arc. In both empirical models of the Earth’s magnetic field and MHD simulations the aurora map earthward of the near-Earth plasma sheet. Some studies using data from spacecraft orbiting earthward of the plasma sheet seem to indicate that expansion phase changes occur first there then move down the tail. Near 8.8RE oscillations with periods of about 13s were found in components of the magnetic field near substorm onset. Ion fluxes (100 keV to 1 MeV) increased by an order of magnitude. Within 4 min of the fluctuations the magnetic field became dipolar. Either the neutral line had to be very close to the site of the observations or the substorm was starting earthward of the NENL.

This led to the development of an alternate model – the current disruption model. In both models during the growth phase a thin current sheet develops in the inner magnetosphere. As the current sheet thins, the ions become non-adiabatic and begin to stream across the current sheet in serpentine orbits. The streaming ions interact with adiabatic electrons drifting in the opposite direction producing plasma waves (called lower hybrid waves). At the same time a density gradient on the boundary of the plasma sheet drives the lower-hybrid-drift instability. The two types of waves cause the plasma sheet to act resistively thereby disrupting the cross tail current. This gives the “current wedge” which launches a rarefaction wave that propagates down the tail. This causes reconnection deeper in the tail.

Supporters of the near-Earth neutral line model have modified it to account for the current distruption occurring near the Earth and the near-Earth mapping of the aurora. The near-Earth neutral line causes high speed flows to move toward the Earth. When these encounter the strong field region near the Earth they slow down. Parallel currents in the region where the x-component of flow decreases form the current “wedge”. The initial brightening of the aurora occurs at the upward current associated with the current wedge.

In both the current sheet disruption model and the near-Earth neutral line model the thin current sheet becomes unstable. Recently Lyons has suggested that the onset of substorms is triggered by changes in the interplanetary planetary magnetic field. Northward turnings of the IMF are thought to reduce magnetospheric convection. Many substorm onsets occur during reductions in the earthward convection. The northward turning does not have to be complete (ie. the IMF does not have to become northward). One study indicates that approximately 50% of all substorms may be triggered.

Auroral substorm in the ultraviolet – VIS camera on the Polar Satellite