PIPS Development/Validation and a path to automated ice charts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basics of numerical oceanic and coupled modelling Antonio Navarra Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Italy Simon Mason Scripps Institution.
Advertisements

Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
1 Evaluation of two global HYCOM 1/12º hindcasts in the Mediterranean Sea Cedric Sommen 1 In collaboration with Alexandra Bozec 2 and Eric Chassignet 2.
Assimilation of sea surface temperature and sea ice in HIRLAM Mariken Homleid HIRLAM/AAA workshop on surface assimilation Budapest 13 November 2007.
Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations George Halliwell, Nick Shay Rosenstiel School.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
A Coupled Ice-Ocean Model Based on ROMS/TOMS 2.0 W. Paul Budgell Institute of Marine Research and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research Bergen, Norway Terrain-Following.
2005 ROMS Users Meeting Monday, October 24, 2005 Coupled sea-ice/ocean numerical simulations of the Bering Sea for the period 1996-present Enrique Curchitser.
Challenges in Modeling Global Sea Ice in a Changing Environment Marika M Holland National Center for Atmospheric Research Marika M Holland National Center.
Experience of short-range (1-5 days) numerical ice forecasts for the freezing seas. Sergey Klyachkin, Zalman Gudkovich, Roman Guzenko Arctic and Antarctic.
Ice Validation and Verification of the Global Ocean Forecast System 3.1 Ruth H. Preller 1, E. Joseph Metzger 1, Pamela G. Posey 1, Alan J. Wallcraft 1,
Coupled GCM The Challenges of linking the atmosphere and ocean circulation.
National Ice Center Science and Applied Technology Program Dr. Michael Van Woert, Chief Scientist.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
From NOGAPS to NAVGEM 1.1 in GOFS: A Progress Report Main performers: Joe Metzger, Alan Wallcraft (NRL) Ole Martin Smedstad, Debbie Franklin (QNA) Brief.
SMHI in the Arctic Lars Axell Oceanographic Research Unit Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.
Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.
1 1. Motivation and initial objectives 2. Overview of FOAM system 3. Data to be assimilated 4. Sea-ice model and configurations being used 5. Assimilation.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Ocean and sea-ice data assimilation and forecasting in the TOPAZ system L. Bertino, K.A. Lisæter, I. Kegouche, S. Sandven NERSC, Bergen, Norway Arctic.
Results of the assimilation of sea ice concentration and velocity into a sea-ice-ocean model. John Stark, Mike Bell, Matt Martin, Adrian.
IICWG 5 th Science Workshop, April Sea ice modelling and data assimilation in the TOPAZ system Knut A. Lisæter and Laurent Bertino.
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
A High Resolution Coupled Sea-Ice/Ocean Model for the Antarctic Peninsula Region Michael S. Dinniman John M. Klinck Andrea Piñones Center for Coastal Physical.
Imposed versus Dynamically Modeled Sea Ice: A ROMS study of the effects on polynyas and waters masses in the Ross Sea John M. Klinck, Y. Sinan Hüsrevoglu.
Production and Export of High Salinity Shelf Water in a Model of the Ross Sea Michael S. Dinniman Y. Sinan Hüsrevoğlu John M. Klinck Center for Coastal.
Status and plans for assimilation of satellite data in coupled ocean-ice models Jon Albretsen and Lars-Anders Breivik.
Validation of US Navy Polar Ice Prediction (PIPS) Model using Cryosat Data Kim Partington 1, Towanda Street 2, Mike Van Woert 2, Ruth Preller 3 and Pam.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
1 JRA-55 the Japanese 55-year reanalysis project - status and plan - Climate Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency.
Icebergs, Ice Shelves and Sea Ice: A ROMS Study of the Southwestern Ross Sea for Michael S. Dinniman John M. Klinck Center for Coastal Physical.
The passive microwave sea ice products…. ….oh well…
Ocean Surface heat fluxes
Preliminary modeling work simulating N-ICE snow distributions and the associated impacts on: 1)sea ice growth; 2)the formation of melt ponds; and 3)the.
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
Assimilation of Sea Ice Concentration Observations in a Coupled Ocean-Sea Ice Model using the Adjoint Method.
CMEMS Mediterranean MFC. Update on specific development for CMEMS Med-MFC V2 Analysis and Forecast Product 1.Data Assimilation: Grid point EOFs ( * )
CFSRR: 11/7/2007Xingren Wu: The Sea-Ice Model The Sea-Ice Model Xingren Wu EMC/NCEP/NOAA Acknowledgements: all EMC/NCEP members, in particular, Dave Behringer,
Application of HYCOM in Eddy- Resolving Global Ocean Prediction Community Effort: Community Effort: NRL, Florida State, U. of Miami, GISS, NOAA/NCEP, NOAA/AOML,
Adjoint modeling in cryosphere Patrick Heimbach MIT/EAPS, Cambridge, MA, USA
Ocean Data Assimilation for SI Prediction at NCEP David Behringer, NCEP/EMC Diane Stokes, NCEP/EMC Sudhir Nadiga, NCEP/EMC Wanqiu Wang, NCEP/EMC US GODAE.
Visualization of High Resolution Ocean Model Fields Peter Braccio (MBARI/NPS) Julie McClean (NPS) Joint NPS/NAVOCEANO Scientific Visualization Workshop.
Synthesis of work on Budget of Water Vapor and Trace gases in Amazonia Transport and Impacts of Moisture, Aerosols and Trace Gases into and out of the.
HYCOM data assimilation Short term: ▪ Improve current OI based technique Assimilate satellite data (tracks) directly Improve vertical projection technique.
Assessing the U.S. Navy Coupled Ice-Ocean Model vs. Recent Arctic Observations David A. Hebert 1, Richard Allard 1, Pamela Posey 1, E. Joseph Metzger 1,
AOMIP WORKSHOP Ian Fenty Patrick Heimbach Carl Wunsch.
HYCOM and GODAE in Relation to Navy Ocean Prediction An Overview Presented by Harley Hurlburt Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS
Preliminary Evaluations of the Navy's ACNFS versus NASA IceBridge Data David Hebert 1, Richard Allard 1, Pamela Posey 1, Alan Wallcraft 1, Joseph Metzger.
In order to accurately estimate polar air/sea fluxes, sea ice drift and then ocean circulation, global ocean models should make use of ice edge, sea ice.
Impact of sea ice dynamics on the Arctic climate variability – a model study H.E. Markus Meier, Sebastian Mårtensson and Per Pemberton Swedish.
Guoping Gao 1, Changsheng Chen 1, Andrey Proshuntinsky 2 and Robert. C. Beardsley 2 1 Department of Fisheries Oceanography University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
The development of the NSST within the NCEP GFS/CFS
An Assessment of the Navy's Sea Ice Outlook Predictions for 2013
Skillful Arctic climate predictions
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5
Description of the climate system and of its components
A Fear-Inspiring Intercomparison of Monthly Averaged Surface Forcing
GPC-Seoul: Status and future plans
ASCAT sensors onboard MetOps : application for sea ice
A sensitivity study of the sea ice simulation in the global coupled climate model, HadGEM3 Jamie Rae, Helene Hewitt, Ann Keen, Jeff Ridley, John Edwards,
Naval Research Laboratory
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
John (Qiang) Wang, Paul G. Myers, Xianmin Hu, Andrew B.G. Bush
An Approach to Enhance Credibility of Decadal-Century Scale Arctic
Validating NAVO’s Navy Coastal Ocean Model
A Lagrangian Dynamic Model of Sea Ice for Data Assimilation
Data Assimilation of TEMPO NO2: Winds, Emissions and PBL mixing
ROMS+WRF+Budgell Jeff Willison1, Ruoying He1, Michael S. Dinniman2, Xiaojun Yuan3 1North Carolina State University 2Old Dominion University 3Lamont-Doherty.
Presentation transcript:

PIPS Development/Validation and a path to automated ice charts Michael Van Woert U.S. National Ice Center IICWG-IV, St. Petersburg 7 April 2003

PIPS History PIPS 1.0 (1980’s) -- Regional Hibler ice model Climatological ocean (currents and heat fluxes). Separate models for the Barents and Greenland Seas (25 km). PIPS 2.0 (1996) Northern hemisphere Coupled Hibler ice model/Cox ocean model 0.28 degree grid resolution (17-34 km) 15 vertical levels Solid wall boundaries Ocean loosely constrained to Levitus climatology Initialized with NIC/SSMI analysis.

Cox Ocean Model Hibler Ice Model Polar Ice Prediction System 2.0 Forecast Restart (ice-ocean) or Climatology and SSMI Ice Concentration Atmospheric Forcing NOGAPS Cox Ocean Model Hibler Ice Model Model Output Ice Drift Ice Thickness Ice Concentration Ocean Currents Ocean Temps Ocean Salinity 24-hour Forecast for Ice-Ocean Restart

PIPS Data Initialization Model initialized daily from SSM/I ice concentration (CAL/VAL algorithm) PIPS ice concentration is replaced only at locations where observed ice concentration is >80% or <50% and the difference between the two fields is >10% or >5% respectively PIPS ice thickness and ocean mixed layer temperature fields are adjusted to be consistent with the SSM/I observations CAL/VAL 2/26/02 PIPS Analysis 2/26/02 12/7/2018 IAHR

PIPS 2.0 Atmospheric Forcing Model uses daily NOGAPS fields (1 degree resolution) Fields used: Surface Pressure, Surface Air Temperature, Surface Vapor Pressure, Net Shortwave Radiation and Downwelling Longwave Radiation, surface wind stress

Operational Oceanography The norm for ocean forecast verification… “It looks like the ocean, it must be correct.”

For Dec 30, 2000 a) IABP buoy drift and pressure b) PIPS ice drift c) PIPS ice concentration d) PIPS ice thickness

Forecast Skill Scores #1 Af = error of the forecast system Ap = error of a perfect forecast Ar = error of a reference forecast In this formulation SS represents the improvement in accuracy of the forecast with respect to the reference forecast, relative to the total improvement in accuracy.

Forecast Skill Scores #2 Error defined as: Skill score becomes f = Forecast field O = Observed or analyzed field R = Reference field (Yet to be defined) P = Perfect forecast field (Forecast = Observed) Note: MSE for a perfect forecast is 0. That is: MSE(P,O) = 0.

Forecast Skill Scores #3 Perfect forecast SS=1; MSE(f,O)=0 No forecast skill SS=0; MSE(f,O)=MSE(R,O) In general: SS>0 (skillful) when MSE(f,O) < MSE(R,O) SS<0 (unskillful) when MSE(f,O) > MSE(R,O) MSE(R,O) is the yardstick for measuring skill!

Climatological Skill Scores 5% Threshold SS24 (Solid line) ~ 0.8 PIPS Does much better than a climatological forecast

Persistence Skill Scores 5% Threshold SS24 (solid line) ~ 0.1 to 0.3 PIPS slightly better than a persistence forecast in most months

CLIPER Skill Scores 5% Threshold SS24 (solid line) ~ -0.2 to 0.2 Linear combination of CLImatology and PERsistence does better than PIPS during the months of Oct-Feb! PIPS only slightly better than CLI-PER during other months Forecast model must be exceptional to add significant skill!

PIPS 3.0 - Goal New ice model based on technology gained in the 1990’s. Include the ability to forecast regions of lead formation (anisotropic rheology) Coupled to an updated ocean model Using improved atmospheric forcing Improved data assimilation 10 km grid resolution

Global Ocean Model (NCOM) CICE Model Polar Ice Prediction System 3.0 Forecast Restart (ice-ocean) or Ocean Analysis/ SSMI Ice Concentration and Satellite Ice Drift Atmospheric Forcing NOGAPS Global Ocean Model (NCOM) CICE Model Model Output Ice Drift Ice Thickness Ice Concentration Ice conv/div Ice strength Ocean Currents Ocean Temps Ocean Salinity 24-hour Forecast for Ice-Ocean Restart

PIPS 3.0 – Global Ocean Model PIPS 3.0 will be coupled to the NCOM global ocean model (includes daily data assimilation) 1/8 degree resolution with polar cap Arctic resolution ~10 km Model run time (with analysis) – 12 min/day using 128 processors (IBM Winterhawk 2)----5 days = 60 hours, 8 days = 96 hours

NCOM Global Grid Northern Hemisphere Use lat-long grid below 32 N (grid extends to 78.5 S). Use curvilinear grid above 32 N to cover the arctic. Use dx=dy locally from about 50 S to 32 N. Grids tried: 1/2 deg (dx = 55.6 km at eq) from 72 S to 72 N (720 x 422 x 30). 2/3 deg (dx = 78.2 km at eq) global (512 x 320 x 30). 1/3 deg (dx = 39.1 km at eq) global (1024 x 640 x 20). ~1/4 deg avg. 1/6 deg (dx = 19.6 km at eq) global (2048 x 1280 x 40). ~ 1/8 deg avg. AMOP 9; 1/8/01

Global NCOM Ocean Model www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/global_ncom 41 vertical sigma-z levels NOGAPS winds with the assimilation 1m z-level top, 20 sigma of MODAS synthetic T/S fields 48-hr forecast each day Polar Overlap

PIPS 3.0 Ice Model LANL model CICE –Hunke, Lipscomb, Dukowicz) CICE, developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory( LANL), is available for public use via their website.

CICE – LANL Sea Ice Model EVP (efficient, improved response to forcing) Energy conserving Bitz and Lipscomb (1999) thermodynamics Multi-category, linearly remapped ice thickness Energy-based ice ridging Other improvements to physics parameterizations

PIPS 3.0 – Atmospheric Forcing PIPS 3.0 will be driven by the Navy’s global atmospheric model (NOGAPS) NOGAPS commenced running at 50 km resolution on Sept 25, 2002

Planned Data Initialization /Assimilation SSMI will be upgraded to the NASA Team 2 alogrithm Assimilation of satellite derived ice drift and buoy drift data (Preller et al., Tos, 2002) if available. Assimilation of ocean observations into the coupled ice ocean models can improve the sea ice forecast by improving the ocean model forecast

PIPS 3.0 March Ice Concentration

CICE results from 1-year simulation using 1984 ECMWF forcing

Model Initialization/Nowcast Goal: To develop an fully automated sea ice chart (nowcast). Minimum requirements: C, h, V Current practices: PIPS ice concentration (C)is updated at locations where observed ice concentration is >80% or <50% and the difference between the two fields is >10% or >5% respectively PIPS ice thickness (h) and is adjusted to be consistent with the SSM/I PIPS ice motion (V) is being update with Objective Interpolation Issues: Concentration and thickness sensitive to large SSM/I errors Concentration observations not necessarily consistent with ice dynamics

Initialization Methods Simple Replace model with observations or employ basic weighting (Method for PIPS Sea Ice Conc. Initialization) Statistical Minimize errors in statistical (e.g. least squares) manner Optimal Interpolation (PIPS 3.0, Ice Drift Assimilation) Kalman Filter Variational Minimize cost function (e.g. disagreement between model and observations) subject to constraints (e.g., model physics) Complex and can be difficult to develop

The Model Velocity: Concentration: Thickness: Sh is the total ice growth Sc is the rate at which ice-covered area is created by melting and freezing

Free Drift Model Free Drift 2% of Wind speed 20o Right of wind

Variational Method Data inputs: Prior day’s, 24 hour forecasts of u24, v24, C24, h24 Current days 85 GHz drift (uo, vo) Current day’s SSM/I ice concentrations Co Impose constraints fh(u,v,h)=0 fC(u,v,C)=0 The sprit of the approach is to keep the initialized fields close to the observations while exactly satisfying the constraints. l1 and l2 are unknown constant Lagrange Multipliers the w’s are data-specific, user-defined weights

Conclusions T=PIPS 2.0 -- 24 hour Skill referenced to climo ~ 0.85 Due to daily reinitialization, PIPS provides good forecast relative to climo T= PIPS 2.0 -- 24 hour Skill referenced to persist ~ 0.2 (Mar-Oct) Sea ice fields most variable in the MIZ Poor performance during “freeze-up” – MIZ parameterizations & forcing ? T=24 hour PIPS Skill referenced to CLIPER ~ 0.1 (Mar-Oct) Non-skillful forecasts Oct – Feb During winter months linear combination of persistence & climo does best PIPS 3.0 will come online shortly Will include assimilation of sea ice motion Further work is required to accurately initialize PIPS Ancillary benefit will be an Automated Sea Ice Chart

The End