Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Zachary Lee Johnson, Jue Chen  Cell 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 137, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages e4 (March 2018)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Graham D. Bailey, Jae K. Hyun, Alok K. Mitra, Richard L. Kingston 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Structural Basis for Recognition of Diubiquitins by NEMO
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Volume 110, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Elisa Bergamin, Peter T. Hallock, Steven J. Burden, Stevan R. Hubbard 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 191-201 (January 2015) The Strength and Cooperativity of KIT Ectodomain Contacts Determine Normal Ligand- Dependent Stimulation or Oncogenic Activation in Cancer  Andrey V. Reshetnyak, Yarden Opatowsky, Titus J. Boggon, Ewa Folta-Stogniew, Francisco Tome, Irit Lax, Joseph Schlessinger  Molecular Cell  Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 191-201 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of T417I,Δ418,419 KIT D4D5 Fragment (A) Ribbon diagram of T417I,Δ418,419 KIT D4D5 dimer. D4 and D5 of one protomer are purple and blue, and D4, D5 of another protomer are orange and green, respectively. N and C termini are labeled. Ile 417, an oncogenic mutation, is marked with red balls. (B) Surface representation of T417I,Δ418,419 KIT D4D5 dimer. Upper panel shows a view following 90° rotation along the horizontal axis of the view shown in the bottom panel. Color coding is the same as in (A). Two-fold symmetry axis is shown as vertical line passing through the middle of “V.” Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 D5:D5 Dimerization Interface in the Crystal Structure of the Oncogenic T417I,Δ418,419 KIT D4D5 Mutant (A–D) Ribbon representation of two D5 domains forming dimer. D5 from one protomer is blue and D5 from another is in green. Secondary structure elements are labeled according to IgSF nomenclature. βA and βG—the hot spots for oncogenic mutation—are highlighted in red. D4D5 dimer is rotated ∼90° around the vertical axis relative to the orientation of D4D5 dimer in Figure 1A. (A) Overview of D5:D5 dimerization interface. (B) Detailed view of contacts between βA of one protomer and βG of another protomer. Hydrogen bonds are shown with red dotted lines. Side chains are shown only for those residues, which form hydrogen bonds. (C) The same orientation as D4D5 dimer in Figure 1A and 90° rotated relative to orientation in (A). Only strands A and G from each protomer are represented. Side chains involved in van der Waals interactions are represented with sticks model. (D) Contacts between DE loop of one protomer and strand G and CC′ loop are depicted. Side chains involved in van der Waals interactions are shown with sticks and labeled. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Fitting of KIT Ectodomain Crystal Structure into Electron Microscopy 3D Reconstruction (A) Crystal structure of KIT ectodomain in complex with SCF (PDB ID: 2E9W, Yuzawa et al., 2007) was fitted into the volume of the 3D EM reconstruction (EMD-2648, Opatowsky et al., 2014). KIT:SCF crystal structure is surface represented and beige; 3D EM reconstruction is represented with gray mesh (EMD-2648, Opatowsky et al., 2014). Right image is 90° rotated along vertical axis relative to the left image. The homotypic D5 contacts seen in the crystal structure do not fit into the volume of the 3D EM reconstruction (depicted in the lower image). (B) D1-D4 domains from KIT:SCF complex (PDB ID: 2E9W, Yuzawa et al., 2007) and D5 dimer from our current structure of T417I,Δ418,419 KIT mutant are grafted together and fitted into 3D EM reconstruction (EMD-2648, Opatowsky et al., 2014). Color code for D1-D4 of KIT and SCF is the same as in (A). D5:D5 dimer from T417I,Δ418,419 structure are colored with blue (one protomer) and green (second protomer). Distances within the WT KIT:SCF and the oncogenic T417I,ΔY418D419 complexes are presented in Figure S7. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Rescue of Ligand Dependency of the Oncogenic T417I,Δ418,419 KIT Mutant (A) Cartoon representation of D5:D5 interface. Residues, which were mutated in (C) and (D) are shown with sticks and labeled. Color code is the same as in Figure 2. (B) Schematic representation of D5:D5 interface contacts for T417I,Δ418,419 mutant. One protomer is blue and another protomer is green. β strands are represented with arrows. Hydrogen bonds are shown with red dashes and hydrophobic interactions with golden dashes. Residues involved in mediating the dimer interface formation are shown with circles and numbered according to WT KIT. Interface contacts were calculated using the PDBsum server (Laskowski, 2009). Only β strands A and G, and DE loop are highlighted; a full scheme of 2D secondary structure of T417I,Δ418,419 mutant is represented in Figure S5. (C) Ligand-dependent activity of T417I,Δ418,419 oncogenic KIT mutant can be fully or partially restored by point mutations of residues involved in the D5:D5 dimerization interface. Residues indicated in the upper image were mutated in the context of T417I,Δ418,419 oncogenic KIT mutant. (D) The same point mutations in the context of wild-type KIT (WT KIT) receptor do not interfere with tyrosine kinase activities except for the double mutation of R420E and N505D. 3T3 cells transiently expressing full-length KIT receptor variants (as indicated in the upper image) were stimulated with 25 ng/ml SCF for 6 min at 37°C. Residues indicated in the upper image were mutated in the context of WT KIT. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Multiangle Light Scattering Experiment Demonstrating Dimerization State of KIT D4D5 Fragments: WT and Oncogenic Mutants Different concentrations of KIT D4D5 fragments were injected onto an HPLC system equipped with light scattering (LS) detector and differential refractometer (RI). Weight-average molar mass was calculated based on LS and RI signals. The weight average molar masses were plotted as a function of concentration (dots on the graph). Solid line represents simulation of dimerization curves (top left) or nonlinear regression fit of the data to the model (see Equation 1 in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Dimerization constants calculated by nonlinear regression fit are presented in the table (right). Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 In Vivo Autophosphorylation of WT or Oncogenic KIT Mutants (A) Schematic representation of full-length KIT receptor. D1–D5 are Ig-like domains. D1–D3 are represented as cylinders colored in yellow; D4 and D5 are in orange and pink, respectively. TM is transmembrane (black), JM, juxtamembrane (red); PTK, protein tyrosine kinase (blue); KI, kinase insert (purple) domains. Oncogenic mutations and Arg381 are labeled. (B–E) Tyrosine kinase activity was compared for WT—wild-type KIT receptor (B); DupA502,Y503—duplication of Ala502 and Tyr503 (C); T417I ΔY418D419—substitution of Thr417 to Ile and deletion of Tyr418 and Asp419 (D); and Δ559,560—deletion of Val559 and Val560 (E). WT or oncogenic KIT mutants (left) were compared to those harboring an additional mutation of an Arg381 (middle)—residue responsible for D4:D4 homotypic contacts. NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing WT KIT or oncogenic mutants were stimulated with increasing concentration of SCF (as indicated in the upper image) for 6 min at 37°C. Lysates of unstimulated or SCF-stimulated cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using anti-KIT antibodies followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (IB) with anti-pTyr (IB: pTyr) or anti-KIT (IB: KIT) antibodies (as indicated). Right images: surface representation of membrane proximal Ig-like domains (B–D) or cartoon representation of the kinase domain (E); oncogenic mutations are highlighted with red. The strength of D5:D5 contacts and the impact of D4 salt bridge integrity are schematically represented with arrows. Dimerization constants for D4D5 fragment are shown at the bottom of the right image. See also experiments in Figure S6. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A “Zipper-like” Mechanism for Ligand-Dependent or Oncogenic KIT Activation SCF binding brings two KIT monomers together. The increase in local concentration of KIT upon ligand-induced dimerization enables formation of multiple low-affinity associations between different regions of neighboring KIT molecules by means of a “zipper-like” process that propagates in a cooperative manner from the SCF binding region to D4, D5, TM, and to the cytoplasmic region, leading to formation of asymmetric KIT dimers. We propose that the asymmetric kinase arrangements represent snapshots of molecular interactions taking place between two tyrosine kinase domains poised toward trans autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues located in different parts of the cytoplasmic region in an orderly manner. In this process, the membrane proximal cis JM autoinhibited kinase may function as a substrate (green) and the membrane distal kinase will function as an active enzyme (purple). After trans autophosphorylation, the roles of the two kinase molecules are switched. Ectodomain of KIT depicted in blue, TM in yellow, JM region is shown as a red loop, and SCF in magenta. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 191-201DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.021) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions