Some recent decisions: NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.
New Datums Are Coming in 2022!  Both a new geometric and a new geopotential (vertical) datum will be released in  The realization of the new datums.
NGS Geodetic Tools and Education Services Marti Ikehara: California Geodetic Advisor
National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Plan Overview Center for Operational Oceanographic.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Ronnie Taylor alternate Subcommittee Chair Deputy Director, National Geodetic Survey.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
Vertical Datums and Heights
and IGLD 85 Hydraulic Correctors
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.
Geodesy, Map Projections and Coordinate Systems
Progress Toward a Unified Geoid-Based Vertical Datum for North America
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Lecture 11: Geometry of the Ellipse 25 February 2008 GISC-3325.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Geographic Information Systems Spatial Referencing Lecture 4 Week 6 1 st.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.
NGS Produces New Coordinates: Is it still NAD83? Past, Present, Future Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA.
Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
The GRAV-D Project and The Future of NAD 83 and NAVD 88 A briefing for FEMA leadership Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey.
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
Understanding North American Geocentric Reference Frames in Geographic Calculator Dr. Qassim Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc. The 2015 Blue Marble User Conference.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
VRSWG Update Renee Shields Height Modernization Manager National Geodetic Survey January 10, 2012.
Benefits of the New Reference Frames Dru Smith Joe Evjen 60 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
Progress toward the Geopotential Reference Frame Dru Smith Dan Roman Vicki Childers 45 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…
Positioning America for the future A New Geometric Datum for the U.S.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
VERTICAL DATUMS APRIL 08, 2008 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor
Upcoming replacements for NAD83, NAVD88 and IGLD85 Dru Smith, NGS Richard Snay, NGS Thomas Landon, NGS.
Debriefing the Geospatial Summit NGS Monthly Webinar Series September 10, 2015.
Progress towards a common North American Geoid in 2012 Daniel Roman, Yan Wang & Xiaopeng Li National Geodetic Survey Geosciences Research Division.
Proposal for a comprehensive vertical datum for North America, Central America and the Caribbean Dru Smith, Dan Roman, Vicki Childers, Mark Eckl, Monica.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
Overview of New Datums A webinar for Monthly Height Mod Meeting Dru Smith Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey March 12, 2015Webinar for Monthly.
Giovanni Sella CORS Program Manager NOAA-National Geodetic Survey CORS’s New Revised Coordinates GLRHMP – Columbus, OH 13 October, 2011.
Dozen New Things in 2-0-Dozen
NSRS Modernization Update
Datums and Projections Demystifying the Reference Frame
ATOC 4720 class31 1. Coordinate systems 2. Forces.
Earth to Globe to Map Map Projection: Map Scale: Scale Factor, k
0/27 Merriam-Webster: a branch of applied mathematics concerned with the determination of the size and shape of the earth and the exact positions of points.
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Presentation transcript:

Some recent decisions: NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Names and Blueprints Dru Smith NSRS Modernization Manager NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Since 2008… NGS has had two “ten year plans” Heavy on broad sweeping decisions e.g. “Replace NAD 83” Light on details How? What do we call it? 2016 was a good year for filling in those details There are actually 3 “NAD 83”s, NAD 83(2011), NAD 83(PA11) and NAD 83(MA11) There are also many more vertical datums than NAVD 88 in the NSRS, each one for specific states or territories that have no line of sight to CONUS/Alaska April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD So…what’s new? Names April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Names The New: The North American Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2022 (NATRF2022) The Caribbean Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2022 (CTRF2022) The Pacific Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2022 (PTRF2022) The Mariana Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2022 (MTRF2022) The Old: NAD 83(2011) NAD 83(PA11) NAD 83(MA11) April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Names The Old: NAVD 88 PRVD 02 VIVD09 ASVD02 NMVD03 GUVD04 IGLD 85 IGSN71 GEOID12B DEFLEC12B Orthometric Heights The New: The North American-Pacific Geopotential Datum of 2022 (NAPGD2022) - Will include GEOID2022 Normal Orthometric Heights Dynamic Heights Gravity Geoid Undulations Deflections of the Vertical April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

So…what’s new in 6 months? Names Scientific Decisions Codified in “Blueprint for 2022” documents April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Scientific Decisions Blueprint for 2022, Part 1: Geometric Four plate-fixed Terrestrial Reference Frames And what “plate fixed” means Mathematical equation between IGS and TRFs Plate Rotation Model for each plate Coordinates at survey epoch Intra-frame velocity model To compare coordinates surveyed at different epochs April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Replacing the NAD 83’s Three plate-(pseudo)fixed frames will be replaced with four plate-fixed reference frames N. Amer., Pacific, Mariana, Caribbean(new!) Remove long-standing non-geocentricity of NAD 83 frames All four : identical to IGSxx at a TBD epoch 2020.00? All four : differ from IGSxx by plate rotation only Updated Euler Pole determination for rigid plate only April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Each frame will get 3 parameters Euler Pole Latitude Euler Pole Longitude Rotation rate (radians / year) This will be used to compute time-dependent TRF2022 coordinates from time-dependent IGS coordinates. April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

NATRF2022 frame is rigid and fixed to rigid part of the N.A. plate Non-rigid part of the N.A. plate (deformation) area April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD NATRF2022 coordinates over time (Remember: The NATRF2022 frame is rigid) Point on deforming part of plate Point on rigid part of plate l l t t April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD NATRF2022 coordinates over time (Remember: The NATRF2022 frame is rigid) Point on deforming part of plate Point on rigid part of plate l l t t April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD NATRF2022 coordinates over time (Remember: The NATRF2022 frame is rigid) Point on deforming part of plate Point on rigid part of plate l l t t April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD NATRF2022 coordinates over time (Remember: The NATRF2022 frame is rigid) Point on deforming part of plate Point on rigid part of plate l l t t April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

Intra-frame velocities This is the velocity of the point in NATRF2022. Rotation of plate removed. It is not constant because the point still suffers small “intra-frame” velocities. Such IFVs will be captured in a model by NGS. This is the velocity of the point in ITRF. Includes all movements, but the dominant one is the rotation of the N.A. Plate. April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Scientific Decisions!! Blueprint for 2022, Part 2: Geopotential Global 3-D Geopotential Model (GGM) Will contain all GRAV-D data Able to yield any physical value on/above surface Special high-resolution geoid, DoV and surface gravity products consistent with GGM Not global: NA/Pacific, American Samoa, Guam/CNMI Time-Dependencies Geoid monitoring service Impacts of deglaciation, sea level rise, earthquakes, etc April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD GEOID2022 (et al) over American Samoa: -16 to -10, 186-193 GEOID2022 (et al) over Guam/CNMI: 11-22, 143-148 GEOID2022 (et al) over the North America/Pacific/Caribbean/Central America/Greenland region will range from 0 to 90 latitude and from 170 to 350 longitude. April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD Blueprint for 2022 Part 1: Geometric Part 2: Geopotential Part 3: Bluebooking April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD

Time-Dependencies as a service: NATRF2022 and actual survey epochs NAD 83 forcibly combined data spanning many years (using HTDP with no vertical modeling) to compute and find one height at one epoch. NATRF2022 will compute coordinates at survey epoch to show actual motion. Even gridding surrounding CORS yields better subsidence rates than you have today. Potential outline and speaker assignments; can be adjusted as needed. NAD 83 best estimate of dh/dt: +2.8 mm / year NATRF2022 best estimate of dh/dt: -4.2 mm / year April 24, 2017 2017 Geospatial Summit, Silver Spring, MD CORS best estimate of dh/dt: -2.2 mm / year