Relativistic Variable Eddington Factor Plane-Parallel Case

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of State Transitions in Black Hole Candidates Ryoji Matsumoto (Chiba Univ.) Collaborators: Takayuki Ogawa, Tomohisa.
Advertisements

Magnetic dissipation in Poynting dominated outflows Yuri Lyubarsky Ben-Gurion University.
Super-Eddington Accretion: Models and Applications Jian-Min Wang Institute of High Energy Physics 2005, 4, 26.
Steady Models of Black Hole Accretion Disks including Azimuthal Magnetic Fields Hiroshi Oda (Chiba Univ.) Mami Machida (NAOJ) Kenji Nakamura (Matsue) Ryoji.
SELF-SIMILAR SOLUTIONS OF VISCOUS RESISTIVE ACCRETION FLOWS Jamshid Ghanbari Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
GRMHD Simulations of Jet Formation with Newly-Developed GRMHD Code K.-I. Nishikawa (NSSTC/UAH), Y. Mizuno (NSSTC/MSFC/NPP), P. Hardee (UA), S. Koide (Kumamoto.
BLACK HOLE Movie courtesy Wolfgang Steffen, University Guadalajara, Mexico.
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Relativistic photon mediated shocks Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University With Omer Bromberg (PRL 2008)
March 28, 2011 HW 7 due Wed. Midterm #2 on Monday April 4 Today: Relativistic Mechanics Radiation in S.R.
Magnetic accelerations of relativistic jets. Serguei Komissarov University of Leeds UK TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
The formation of stars and planets
Relativistic MHD Jets in GRB Steady State Rarefaction K. Sapountzis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Kyoto 2013.
Radiation Hydrodynamic simulations of super-Eddington Accretion Flows super-Eddington Accretion Flows Radiation Hydrodynamic simulations of super-Eddington.
Relativistic Outflow Formation by Magnetic Field around Rapidly Rotating Black Hole Shinji Koide ( Toyama University ) Black Hole 2003, October 29 (Wed),
Electromagnetic and Radiative Processes Near Black Hole Event Horizon Kinwah Wu (MSSL, University College London) Steven Von Fuerst (KIPAC, Stanford University)
Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows Roman Shcherbakov, 28 November, 2007.
International Workshop on Astronomical X-Ray Optics Fingerprints of Superspinars in Astrophysical Phenomena Zdeněk Stuchlík and Jan Schee Institute of.
Hyperaccretion Andrew King Theoretical Astrophysics Group, University of Leicester, UK collaborators — Mitch Begelman (Colorado), Jim Pringle (IoA)
Monte-Carlo Simulation of Thermal Radiation from GRB Jets Sanshiro Shibata (Konan Univ.) Collaborator: Nozomu Tominaga (Konan Univ., IPMU)
High energy Astrophysics Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL 6. Jets and radio emission.
Collapsar Accretion and the Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Light Curve Chris Lindner Milos Milosavljevic, Sean M. Couch, Pawan Kumar.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Super-Critical Accretion Flow? Shin Mineshige (Kyoto Univ.) with K. Ohsuga, K. Vierdayanti, K. Ebisawa, T. Kawaguchi AGN Xian (10/16/2006)
1 S. Davis, April 2004 A Beta-Viscosity Model for the Evolving Solar Nebula Sanford S Davis Workshop on Modeling the Structure, Chemistry, and Appearance.
Black Hole Accretion Theoretical Limits And Observational Implications Dominikus Heinzeller Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics Center for Astronomy.
G.S. Bianovatyi-Kogan, Yu.N. Krivosheev Space Research Institute, Moscow (IKI RAN) Thermal balance of the jet in the microquasar SS433 HEPRO-III, Barcelona.
General Relativistic MHD Simulations with Finite Conductivity Shinji Koide (Kumamoto University) Kazunari Shibata (Kyoto University) Takahiro Kudoh (NAOJ)
Warm Absorbers: Are They Disk Outflows? Daniel Proga UNLV.
1 Analytical Relations for the Transfer Equation (Mihalas 2) Formal Solutions for I, J, H, K Moments of the TE w.r.t. Angle Diffusion Approximation.
Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung University and Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle astrophysics,
Luminous accretion disks with optically thick/thin transition A. S. Klepnev,G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan.
Neutrino-Cooled Accretion Models for Gamma-Ray Bursts Tong Liu, Wei-Min Gu, Li Xue, & Ju-Fu Lu Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Xiamen.
Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto National College of Technology), Collaborators: Kei Kotake(NAOJ), Sho-ichi.
Radio-Loud AGN Model (Credit: C.M. Urry and P. Padovani ) These objects also have hot, ADAF-type accretion flows, where the radiative cooling is very.
Global 3D MHD Simulations of Optically Thin Black Hole Accretion Disks
QUASAR-MICROQUASAR ANALOGY The scales of length and time are proportional to M BH R sh = 2GM BH /c 2 ;  T  M BH Unique system of equations: The maximum.
Accretion onto Black Hole : Advection Dominated Flow
Global Simulations of Time Variabilities in Magnetized Accretion Disks Ryoji Matsumoto (Chiba Univ.) Mami Machida (NAOJ)
July 9, 2006 Waves and Turbulence 1 Disk accretion: origin and development Nikolay Shakura Sternberg Astronomical Institute Moscow, Russia.
Global MHD Simulations of State Transitions and QPOs in Black Hole Accretion Flows Machida Mami (NAOJ) Matsumoto Ryoji (Chiba Univ.)
T HE VORTICAL MECHANISM OF GENERATION & COLLIMATION OF THE ASTROPHYSICAL JETS M.G. A BRAHAMYAN Yerevan State University, Armenia.
Simulation of a self-propelled wake with small excess momentum in a stratified fluid Matthew de Stadler and Sutanu Sarkar University of California San.
Fourier’s Law and the Heat Equation
The Role of Magnetic Fields in Black Hole Accretion
K-ε model, ASM model.
RXTE Spectral Observations of the Galactic Microquasar GRO J1655-40
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Myeong-Gu Park (Kyungpook National University, KOREA)
Appendix C Radiation Modeling
Fermi Collaboration Meeting
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Radiative Field (Hubeny & Mihalas Chapter 3)
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
RADIATION AND COMBUSTION PHENOMENA
Shuang-Nan Zhang, Yuan Liu, Jin Zhang Institute of High Energy Physics
Contents Introduction Force-Free Approximation Analytical Solutions
Arianna Ligorini Department of Gamma-ray Astrophysics Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS, Krakow Jacek Niemiec Department of Gamma-ray Astrophysics Institute.
Photosphere Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Afterglow Radiation from Gamma-Ray Bursts
PRE(Photospheric Radius Expansion) X-ray burst simulation with MESA(Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) rd CHEA Workshop Gwangeon.
AGN: Quasars By: Jay Hooper.
Analytical Relations for the Transfer Equation (Hubeny & Mihalas 11)
COMBUSTION TA : Donggi Lee PROF. SEUNG WOOK BAEK
Black Holes Escape velocity Event horizon Black hole parameters
Radiative Field (Hubeny & Mihalas Chapter 3)
Lecture 7: Jets on all scales Superluminal apparent motions.
Magnetic acceleration of relativistic jets
Presentation transcript:

Relativistic Variable Eddington Factor Plane-Parallel Case Jun Fukue Osaka Kyoiku University

Plan of My Talk 0 Astrophysical Jets 1 Radiation Hydrodynamics Moment Formalism Eddington Approximation and Diffusion Approximation Variable Eddington Factor and Flux-Limited Diffusion 2 Relativistic Radiation Hydrodynamics Eddington Approximation in the Comoving Frame Relativistic Eddington Factor 3 Analytical Approach:One-Tau Photo Oval One-Tau Region in the Comoving Frame Linear Analysis Linear Approximation Semi-Linear Approximation 4 Results:Comoving Radiation Fields and Eddington Factor 5 Discussion 6 Next Step 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

0 Astrophysical Jets and Other Radiative Phenomena

Relativistic Astrophysical Jets GRS1915 SS433 (YSO) (CVs, SSXSs) Crab pulsar SS 433 microquasar AGN quasar gamma-ray burst 3C273 M87 GRB 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

Relativistic Radiative Phenomena Black Hole Accretion Flow Relativistic Outflow Gamma-Ray Burst Neutrino Torus in Hypernova Early Universe 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

1 Preparation Moment Fomalism of Radiation Hydrodynamics

1. RHD Radiation Hydrodynamics for matter Radiative Transfer for radiation couple Radiation Hydrodynamics for matter+radiation 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

1. RHD Fundamental Equation Boltzman equation for matter Transfer equation for radiation 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

1. RHD Moment Formalism Moment equations Moment equations for matter for radiation 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

1. RHD Closure Relation 1 Closure relation Closure relation for matter for radiation 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

in optically thick to thin regimes 1. RHD  Closure Relation 2 Closure relation in optically thick to thin regimes Tamazawa et al. 1975 OK: Physically correct in the limited cases of tau=0 and infinity. NG: Quantitatively incorrect in the region around tau=1. Levermore and Pomraning 1981 OK: Vector form convenient for numerical simulations NG: Diffusion type cannot apply to an optically thin regime causality problem 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

1. RHD Closure Relation 2 Ohsuga+ 2005 Order of (v/c)1 Time-dependent Two dimensional Flux-Limited Diffusion 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2 Motivation Validity of Eddington Approximation in Moment Fomalism of Relativistic Radiation Hydrodynamics

2. RRHD Moment Formalism Moment equations for matter continuity momentum energy 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2. RRHD Moment Formalism Moment equations for radiation 0th moment 1st moment 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2. RRHD Closure Relation 1 Usual closure relation for radiation Isotropic assumption may break down in the relativistic regime even in the comoving frame. Eddington Factor Fukue 2005 Diffusion Approximation Castor 1972 Ruggles, Bath 1979 Flammang 1982 Tullola+ 1986 Paczynski 1990 Nobili+ 1993, 1994 Numerical Simulations Eggum+ 1985, 1988 Kley 1989 Okuda+ 1997 Kley, Lin 1999 Okuda 2002 Okuda+ 2005 Ohsuga+ 2005 Ohsuga 2006 In the comoving frame Diffusion assumption may break down in the optically thin and/or relativistic regimes even in the comoving frame. 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2.RRHD Pathological Behavior Violation of Eddington Approximation in the Relativistic Moment Formalism    Turolla and Nobili 1988    Turolla et al. 1995    Dullemond 1999    Fukue 2005 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2.RRHD Singularity at v=c/√3 or β2=1/3 Deno.=0! Plane-parallel flow u=γβ=γv/c: four velocity F:radiative flux P:radiation pressure J:mass flux 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2.RRHD Validity of Closure Relation The cause of the singularity is the Eddington approximation in the comoving frame. P0:radiation pressure in the comoving frame E0:radiation energy density   P0= f E0: f =1/3 This assumption violates at v~c since the radiation fields become anisotropic even in the comoving frame. 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2. RRHD Closure Relation 2 What is a closure relation in subrelativistic to relativistic regimes Tamazawa+ 1975 f=(1+τ)/(1+3τ) τ→τ/[γ(1+β)] Fukue 2006 Akizuki, Fukue 2007 Abramowicz+ 1991 Koizumi, Umemura 2007 Fukue 2007; this study 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2. RRHD Closure Relation 2 What is a closure relation in subrelativistic to relativistic regimes Fukue 2006 Akizuki, Fukue 2007 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2. RRHD Closure Relation 2 What is a closure relation in subrelativistic to relativistic regimes mean free path l= Koizumi, Umemura 2007 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

2. RRHD Closure Relation 2 What is a closure relation in subrelativistic to relativistic regimes dβ/dτ β Fukue 2007; this study 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3 Analytical Approach One-Tau Photo-Oval

Plane-Parallel Accelerating Flow in the Vertical Direction v large ρ small vertical (z) flow velocity (v) up density (ρ) down Shape of region of τ=1 seen by a comoving observer surface 光壺 Photo-vessel 光玉 Photo-oval v small ρ large base 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Linear Regime Comoving observer at z=z0,β=β0 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Linear Regime Linear density gradient One-tau range length Optical depth in the s-direction 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Linear Regime Shape of photo-oval a= 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Linear Regime Breakup condition 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Semi-Linear Regime Optical depth in the s-direction 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Semi-Linear Regime Shape of photo-oval 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

3.Photo Oval Semi-Linear Regime Breakup condition 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

4 Results Comoving Radiation Fields and Variable Eddington Factor

4.Radiation Fields Comoving Radiation Fields Radiative intensity in the comoving frame Redshift due to relative velocity between the comoving observer and the inner wall of photo-oval 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

4.Radiation Fields Linear Regime Non-uniformity of the comoving radiative intensity Redshift due to relative velocity 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

4.Radiation Fields Comoving Intensity Radiataive intensity observed by the comoving observer at τ=τ0 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

4.VEF  Linear Regime 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

4.VEF  Linear Regime 3 × f (β, dβ/dτ) dβ/dτ β 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

4.VEF Semi-Linear Regime 3 × f (β, dβ/dτ) dβ/dτ β 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

5 Discussion

5.Discussion 他の成分 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

 Concluding Remarks We have semi-analytically examined the relativistic Eddington factor of the plane-parallel flow under the linear approximation. We proved that it decreases in proportion to the velocity gradient in the subrelativistic regime. We will study in the future an extremely relativistic regime, an optically thin case, a spherical flow, and so on. 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

+.Next Preliminary Results not β but u=γβ Comoving observer at z=z0,u=u0 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

+.Next Preliminary Results 3 × f (u, du/dτ) du/dτ u 2018/12/7 QPO workshop

+.One more period Observational Appearance of Relativistic Spherical Winds Sumitomo+ 2007 Apparent Photosphere Abramowicz+ 1991 Enchanced Luminosity 2018/12/7 QPO workshop