The quest for a consistent signal in ground and GRACE gravity time series M. Van Camp – B. Meurers – O. de Viron L. Métivier – O. Francis Special thanks:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Predictable Chaotic Exhibits memory Equilibrium Towards non-equilibrium Acknowledgements LD is supported by NERC CASE award NER/S/A/2004/ Conclusions.

Advertisements

Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network

The effect of doubled CO 2 and model basic state biases on the monsoon- ENSO system Andrew Turner, Pete Inness, Julia Slingo Walker Institute / NCAS-Climate.

The effect of doubled CO 2 and model basic state biases on the monsoon- ENSO system: the mean response and interannual variability Andrew Turner, Pete.

13th Annual FLOW-3D Users Conference Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity June 13-14, 2013 | Madrid 1 Preliminary Numerical Simulation of.

03/000 First geodetic results from the AuScope VLBI network Oleg Titov Australian Government Geoscience Australia UTAS, Hobart, 20 June 2012.

Time Variable Gravity Implementation issues for Jason L. Cerri, S. Houry, J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March.

Characterizing the noise affecting land-based gravity measurements for improved distinction of tectonic signals Michel Van Camp Collaboration with: T.

Group Velocity Dispersion Curves from Wigner-Ville Distributions Simon Lloyd 1, Goetz Bokelmann 1, Victor Sucic 2 1 University of Vienna 2 University of.

An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.

Atmospheric Loading Nicole M. Shivers.  “The Earth’s surface is perpetually being displaced due to temporally varying atmospheric oceanic and continental.

Clima en España: Pasado, presente y futuro Madrid, Spain, 11 – 13 February 1 IMEDEA (UIB - CSIC), Mallorca, SPAIN. 2 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton,

1 Time Variations of the European Gravity Field, David Crossley, Saint Louis University, Missouri, USA Jacques Hinderer, EOST / IPG, Strasbourg,

Determination of Gravity Variations in Northern Europe from GRACE Jürgen Müller, Matthias Neumann-Redlin Institut für Erdmessung, University of Hannover,

Some Hydrological and Cryospheric Applications of GRACE John Wahr (U of Colorado), Sean Swenson (NCAR), Isabella Velicogna (U of California at Irvine)

The influence of extra-tropical, atmospheric zonal wave three on the regional variation of Antarctic sea ice Marilyn Raphael UCLA Department of Geography.

Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.

INTERDECADAL OSCILLATIONS OF THE SOUTH AMERICAN MONSOON AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE João Paulo Jankowski Saboia Alice Marlene Grimm.

Seamless precipitation prediction skill in a global model: Actual versus potential skill Matthew Wheeler 1, Hongyan Zhu 1, Adam Sobel 2, and Debra Hudson.

Q factor of an underdamped oscillator large if  is small compared to  0 Damping time or "1/e" time is  = 1/   (>> 1/   if  is very small)

Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability 6-9 June, 2006 Paris, France The.

Regional Climate Modeling in the Source Region of Yellow River with complex topography using the RegCM3: Model validation Pinhong Hui, Jianping Tang School.

Spatial coherence of interannual variability in water properties on the U.S. northeast shelf David G. Mountain and Maureen H. Taylor Presented by: Yizhen.

WE WA VI ST PE MO MB MC CO BH MC MB MO PE ST VI WA Comparison of GRACE gravity field solutions, hydrological models and time series of superconducting.

Generalization of Farrell's loading theory for applications to mass flux measurement using geodetic techniques J. Y. Guo (1,2), C.K. Shum (1) (1) Laboratory.

Snowpack Measurements From Underground John Wahr and Judah Levine Department of Physics University of Colorado.

IGCP 565: The workshop series and recommendations Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada,

Free-body Diagrams To help us understand why something moves as it does (or why it remains at rest) it is helpful to draw a free-body diagram. The free-body.

Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.

Atlantic Multidecadal Variability and Its Climate Impacts in CMIP3 Models and Observations Mingfang Ting With Yochanan Kushnir, Richard Seager, Cuihua.

1 The Venzke et al. * Optimal Detection Analysis Jeff Knight * Venzke, S., M. R. Allen, R. T. Sutton and D. P. Rowell, The Atmospheric Response over the.

Recent hydrological and climatological changes V. Barros.

CCA MADE EASY. The Science of Seasonal Climate Forecasting is all about connecting forcing and response. Once a forcing mechanism is identified the response.

Changes in Floods and Droughts in an Elevated CO 2 Climate Anthony M. DeAngelis Dr. Anthony J. Broccoli.

Sea-Level Change Driven by Recent Cryospheric and Hydrological Mass Flux Mark Tamisiea Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics James Davis Emma Hill.

AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.

IUFRO_20051 Variations of land water storage over the last half century K. Laval, T. Ngo-duc, J. Polcher University PM Curie Paris/Lab Meteor Dyn /IPSL.

A data-model comparison study of the Arctic Ocean's response to atmospheric mode of variability Bruno Tremblay Robert Newton Peter Schlosser Lamont Doherty.

Scaling and Analysis of Long Time Series of Soil Moisture Content By Gabriel Katul Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University.

Interannual Variabilities of High Clouds Seen by AIRS and Comparison with CAM5 simulations Yuk Yung, Hui Su, Katie, Hazel et al.

Recent applications of GRACE gravity data for continental hydrology Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.

Introduction Conservation of water is essential to successful dryland farming in the Palouse region. The Palouse is under the combined stresses of scarcity.

Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,

A better GRACE solution for improving the regional Greenland mass balance Z Xu 1, E.J.O Schrama 1, W. van der. Wal 1 1 Department of Astrodynamics and.

A. Güntner | Hydrogravimetry 1 Sub-humid climate (Mediterranean) Mean annual precipitation: 1200 mm, (highly seasonal) Elevation: 160 m amsl Early results.

Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.

Issues in the Comparison of Ground Gravity with GRACE Data David Crossley, Saint Louis U., Dept. Earth & Atmospheric Science, 3507 Laclede Ave., St. Louis.

The lower boundary condition of the atmosphere, such as SST, soil moisture and snow cover often have a longer memory than weather itself. Land surface.

Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.

Arctic terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE satellite estimates and a land surface hydrology model Fengge Su a Douglas E. Alsdorf b, C.K. Shum.

WE WA VI ST PE MO MB MC CO BH MC MB MO PE ST VI WA Comparison of GRACE gravity field solutions, hydrological models and time series of superconducting.

Assessing the Influence of Decadal Climate Variability and Climate Change on Snowpacks in the Pacific Northwest JISAO/SMA Climate Impacts Group and the.

Long-term temperature records in Antarctica: The view from ice cores David Schneider Department of Earth and Space Sciences University of Washington Seattle,

In the City of Austin Bryan Barnett. Overview Atrophic Effects on the Hydrologic Cycle Potential Effects on the Surface Excessive Run-off High transport.

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie A 3-year series of Earth’s gravity field derived from GRACE range measurements Xianglin Liu, Pavel Ditmar, Qile Zhao,

The joint influence of break and noise variance on break detection Ralf Lindau & Victor Venema University of Bonn Germany.

Antarctic ice mass change estimates from GRACE: Results, uncertainties, and the combination with complementary information Martin Horwath, Reinhard Dietrich.

UBC/UW 2011 Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium Friday, September 30, 2011 DIAGNOSIS OF CHANGING COOL SEASON PRECIPITATION STATISTICS IN THE WESTERN.

1 Validation of Swarm ACC preliminary dataset Swarm 5th Data Quality Workshop, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, France, 7 – 10 September 2015 Aleš.

Trends in floods in small catchments – instantaneous vs. daily peaks

Fluid Force Identification

Impact of ENSO and Volcanoes on Tropical Precipitation

Cross-spectral Analysis

Modelling Climate and Water Isotope Signatures of El Niño in the Pliocene Julia Tindall and Alan Haywood AGU Fall Meeting 15th December 2015.

Investigation of site-dependent GPS errors and monument stability using a short-baseline network of braced monuments Emma Hill, Jim Davis, Pedro Elosegui,

University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System

Impact of ENSO and Volcanoes on Tropical Precipitation

NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A

Step 1: Get Organized Draw a picture.

Variability of the Fresh water content in the Beaufort Gyre

Presentation transcript:

The quest for a consistent signal in ground and GRACE gravity time series M. Van Camp – B. Meurers – O. de Viron L. Métivier – O. Francis Special thanks: T. Jahr V. Palinkas S. Stein H. Wziontek W. Zürn

Comparisons GRACE-superconducting gravimeters Added value by combining them? Numerous publications : e.g. Abe et al., GJI, 2012 & Crossley et al., GJI, sources of information on gravity changes : GRACE & Superconducting Gravimeters

The reality

What GRACE sees

What a land-based gravimeter sees 1 point is 1 km x 1 km (in the best case) Point measurement

How to compare Gravimeters and GRACE ? In both cases: annual signal (not a surprise in geodesy) 40 nm/s² 4 µGal Here: superconducting gravimeter in Bad Homburg (DE) Coherent between the gravimeters? Coherent between gravimeters and GRACE?

To compare annual signals: phasor Maximum within 74 days (for stations experiencing large amplitude) What do we learn? Winters are wetter! Notice: even worse if the sign of underground stations is not inverted 74 days = 25 nm/s²

What about Gravimeters & GRACE ? Annual component No agreement on annual : Neither between SGs Neither between SGs and GRACE If agreement : so what?

Annual removed: Let us look at the interannual How? - EOF technique : common mode significant for 3 gravimeter series not better than random series Why?

11 on 45 pairs significantly correlated (anticorrelated if underground- surface pairs) Only little common signal What can we do with it? 100 nm/s² 10 µGal BH WA MO ST MC VI MB CO WE PE CO MB WA ST PE BH MO MC VI WE Interannual

We find Nothing Is this strange? content/uploads/2013/04/Complex-System-Gut.jpg Disparate phases & amplitudes Complicated transfer function Similar Forcing (let us assume!) Annual Inter- annual 10 on 45 gravimeter pairs significantly correlated

Correcting for local effects? Need to convert gravimeter data to something that we can compare with GRACE : Must know, by other means, the mass of water everywhere around the gravimeter. Must rely on perfect hydrological models, but whats the extra value of comparing gravimeters to GRACE ?

Conclusions We find the case that surface gravity and GRACE data are seeing the same signal to be weak Poor correlations between the gravimeters themselves True for the annual period True for the inter-annual periods Possible common, long period climate effects ? Longer time series & More stations needed SGs great for local hydrogeological investigations GRACE great for large scale hydrogeological phenomena More? See Van Camp et al. GJI (in review)