34th MIG-T meeting – Conclusions and actions INSPIRE MIG-T meeting, Ispra 25-26 October 2016

Feedback from the INSPIRE Conference Main feedback: MIG-T … congratulates EC and local organisers on well organized, well balanced (policy, technical, research) conference notes that there is considerable progress on actual implementations, tool support (from OS community and JRC) notes that there was also an increased number of presentations on use of INSPIRE, but identifying users and user requirements is still an issue; use of INSPIRE could be one of the main focuses for INSPIRE Conference 2017 notes there was an increasing number of presentations on open data welcomes that the environmental as well as local administration communities were more present and well integrated in the Conference recognizes eGovernment as an important use case plus several organizational proposals for INSPIRE 2017 Actions EC to upload as quickly as possible the videos from the parallel sessions All to share interesting presentations/sessions/workshops on the MIG-T collaboration platform (JRC to set up a space)

2016.1 Fitness for purpose – Analysis Main feedback points timeline – don't rush the analysis, but keep the 2017 deadline in mind need to start with the WHY not detailed technical issues – rather strategic, cross-cutting issues of implementation but still important to provide actual evidence methods: sub-group experts, questionnaire, feedback on discussion paper simplification should focus on implementers and users (avoid rendering INSPIRE useless by over-simplification) Actions All to provide feedback on discussion paper by 4/11 ENV to clarify timetable

Marine Pilot – Phase 1 Technical Group – Data (DIKE sub-group) will take over the results from the pilot as a basis for further activities related to MSFD reporting based on INSPIRE

2016.4 Theme-specific implementation issues Conclusions Most MIG-T members said that active participation in day-to-day discussions on the TC platform is not feasible The MIWP14 subgroup (facilitators + MIG-T liaisons) will be reactivated to discuss/filter/select mature issues originated and proposed by facilitators. New MIG-T liaisons topographic ref data and cadaster: Markus Jobst atmospheric and marine: Anders Ryden Actions TC facilitators to deliver a detailed report of "hot issues" well (at least 4 weeks) before MIG-T face-to-face meetings (including also the "parked" change proposals). mention new "hot issues" in monthly status update before virtual MIG-T meetings JRC to publish TG corrigenda & identified IR issues JRC to ask for nominations for remaining open liaison places

MIWP-6 INSPIRE registry roles & procedures Agreed assignment (for INSPIRE registry and RoR): Register owner: EU Register & registry manager: JRC Submitting organizations: One per country (MIG-T or other nominated representative), MIWP-14/TC representatives, JRC, EEA and DG ENV Control body: Small permanent MIG sub-group of nominated register experts sub-group to report regularly to MIG sub-group can escalate issues to MIG for discussion and approval, where appropriate Register user: anyone Actions JRC to update discussion paper based on discussion JRC to draft ToR for submitting organisations and control body

MIWP-6: Externally governed code lists Agreed procedure: code lists with items with resolvable http URIs: Use original URI (and harvest information - Label, …) [this means a change to current TGs] code lists with items without http URIs: Harvest information and create new URI in the http://inspire.ec.europa.eu namespace [no change to current TGs] code lists with items with non-resolvable http URIs: Decide on case-by-case basis after discussion in control body – aim would be to use original URI, when there is confidence that provider will make URIs resolvable in the forseeable future [this could mean a change to current TGs] Actions JRC to add external values in the INSPIRE registry JRC to contact providers of external code list providers

List of priority data sets Conclusions Update of list is appreciated Metadata proposal to identify/monitor the datasets on the Geoportal needs further discussion TBD where to have this discussion (joint activity between 2016.2 and 2016.x actions? part of the proposed joint activity related to making the content of the Geoportal more usable?) Actions ENV to share updated list (Excel table) for comments ENV to share (and present) ENV-EEA scoping paper on INSPIRE and environmental reporting

MIWP action proposals Geoportal Copernicus New technologies issues need to be discussed further, e.g. through a survey to obtain national practices for filtering data in national portals Copernicus action description to be proposed to MIG in Dec aiming at problem analysis and "mini" joint work programme on INSPIRE & Copernicus New technologies start list with "missing components" describe "light" workflow for developing and sharing best practices DSM/eGovernance issues to be discussed further, possibly also outside the MIG-T