CBP and David Allen’s methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2006 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Multiple Access and Effects of Aggregation Notice: This document.
Advertisements

LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
Date: Authors: January 2005
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Protected SSIDs Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
JTC1 Ad Hoc Closing Report
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
E911 and Location Date: Authors: September 2005
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
JTC1 Ad Hoc Mid-week Report
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGn PSMP Adhoc Group Dallas Opening report
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
TGn PSMP Adhoc Group Dallas Opening report
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
May 2005 CAPWAP AHC Closing Report
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Transition Nowhere Date: Authors: Sept 2005 Sept 2005
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
PSMP Adhoc Oct TGn Adhoc
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

CBP and David Allen’s methods January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0056r0 January 2006 CBP and David Allen’s methods Date: 2006-01-15 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Peter Ecclesine Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0056r0 January 2006 Abstract Discussion of David Allen’s Methods for Getting Things Done, and how it could apply to the Study/Task Group, and how it could apply to a Contention-Based Protocol Peter Ecclesine Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

January 2006 Pointer to Reference Getting Things Done, David Allen, ISBN 0-14-200028-0 Peter Ecclesine

The Natural Planning Model (p56-77) January 2006 The Natural Planning Model (p56-77) Defining purpose and principles (p62-66) Why? “I would give others totally free rein to do this as long as they …” Outcome visioning (p67-70) What does a successful standard enable? Brainstorming (p70-74) How? Organizing (p74-75) Identify the significant pieces, Sort Identifying next actions (p75-77) Peter Ecclesine

Quality Quality – the user gets what they expect January 2006 Quality Quality – the user gets what they expect Radios are not fair, wireless is not fair The user does not expect wireless to ignore location and distance Cellphones teach this daily What will users put up with? If you can’t control the medium, you can’t control QoS Quality of Service => Toll-Quality Voice CBP band requires another definition of Quality Peter Ecclesine

Four-Criteria for Choosing Actions (p49) January 2006 Four-Criteria for Choosing Actions (p49) Context – [where, with what] Time available Energy available Priority § 90.7 Definitions. * * * * * Contention-based protocol. A protocol that allows multiple users to share the same spectrum by defining the events that must occur when two or more transmitters attempt to simultaneously access the same channel and establishing rules by which a transmitter provides reasonable opportunities for other transmitters to operate. Such a protocol may consist of procedures for initiating new transmissions, procedures for determining the state of the channel (available or unavailable), and procedures for managing retransmissions in the event of a busy channel. Peter Ecclesine

References Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity January 2006 References Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity David Allen ISBN 0-14-200028-0 Peter Ecclesine