1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD Arguments for the Justification of Theism: Cosmological, Moral, Design (Teleological) and Ontological.
Advertisements

“… if (the best philosophy) doesn ’ t seem peculiar you haven ’ t understood it ” Edward Craig.
Aquinas’s First Way – highlights It’s impossible for something to put itself into motion. Therefore, anything in motion is put into motion by something.
The Cosmological Argument. Also known as ‘The First Cause Argument’ Unlike the Ontological Argument, it derives the conclusion from a posteriori premise.
The Cosmological Argument The idea that there is a first cause behind the existence of the universe.
The Cosmological argument
Cosmological arguments from causation Michael Lacewing
The Cosmological Argument.
Cosmological argument
 The cosmological argument is, as it’s name sugessts (from the greek cosmos, meaning ‘universe’ or ‘world’). An a posteriori argument for the existence.
The Cosmological Argument. This is an a posteriori argument There are many versions of it It is based on observation and understanding of the universe.
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
Knowing God Through Creation Chapter 1 Lesson 1. Read Daniel 3:52 When did you first realize that God exists? How do you know that God exists?
1225 – 1274 (Aquinas notes created by Kevin Vallier) Dominican monk, born to Italian nobility. Worked ~150 years after Anselm. Student of Albert the Great.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways.
PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
Evidently the Cosmological argument as proposed by Aquinas is open to both interpretation and criticism. The Cosmological argument demands an explanation.
Definitions Task – Introduction H/W Common errors – Use of Wikipedia. Use of a regular dictionary instead of a Philosophy dictionary (try Stanford Encyclopedia.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence or how come we all exist? Is there a rational basis for belief in God?
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
Starter - Without your notes – define these terms – 15 mins Synthetic Posteriori Inductive Primary movers Secondary movers Ex nihilo nihil fit Actual infinites.
The Cosmological argument attempts to infer the existence of God from the existence of the cosmos (universe) or from the phenomena within it. The claim.
 To know and understand the Kalam Argument for the existence of God.  To evaluate the Kalam argument.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
Thomas Aquinas and the Existence of God * The Five Ways (or Proofs) of St. Thomas Aquinas. * We can come to know God through reason. * Consistent with.
Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Mr M Banner 2016 Grade 12 th May 2016 Starter: What does Cosmology mean to you? Title:
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways. Thomas Aquinas ( ) Joined Dominican order against the wishes of his family; led peripatetic existence thereafter.
Introduction to Philosophy
Find Somebody who?? Can tell you about 4 proponents of the Cosmological argument. Can tell you who the 3 main critics were. Who the classic proponent is,
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence
Starter: Mix-Pair-Share
Arguments relating to the existence of God
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
William Paley’s argument from analogy
Explaining the universe
Cosmological Argument
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
The Cosmological Argument
Religious Studies A Level Lesson 1
Think, Pair, Share The universe is a series of hooks hanging one below the other from a fixed point on the wall. If the wall was taken away the chain would.
St. Thomas Aquinas. Contents  1. Biography  II. Philosophy and Theology  III. Proofs of God’s Existence  IV. Knowledge of God’s Nature  V. Creation.
Religious Studies A Level Lesson 1
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Explore the use of inductive reasoning in the cosmological argument
The analogy of the Arrow
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Cosmological Argument Essay planning
Aquinas’ three ways Learning Objective
The Cosmological argument
The First Cause (Cosmological) Argument
The Cosmological Argument
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Kalam Cosmological Argument
Or Can you?.
Or Can you?.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation? Think, pair, share.
Explore the key ideas of the cosmological argument. (8 marks)
‘Assess the credibility of the cosmological argument’ (12 marks)
Presentation transcript:

1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument Learning objective To be able to analyse the Kalam form of the Cosmological Argument Learning outcomes Outline and explain the key points and key words Explain the library example

Knowledge Check – on paper Complete the knowledge check activity Is the Cosmological Argument inductive or deductive? What does a posteriori mean?  Underline the correct definition to the key term. ‘The ability to become something else.’ Potentiality or actuality Did Aquinas use the example of fire and water or marble and sculptor? Write a definition of infinite regress. Is the second way referred to as ‘Motion and Change or First Cause’? What example can we use for the second way? What does contingent mean? What does necessary mean? What example did Copleston use to support Aquinas’ third way?

Starter – The Cosmological Argument so far . . . You have 30 seconds Write down as many words connected to the Cosmological Argument you can remember Swop your lists – count how many relevant words they found Write brief definitions of the key words you know and then swop the lists again. Complete the Venn Diagram on page 2

Kalam – in booklet 2 – page 4 An Arabic term meaning to ‘argue’ or ‘discuss’ Argues that everything that exists has a cause of its existence and this includes the universe William Lane Craig developed a modern version of the argument

History of the Kalam Argument page 4 850CE – al Kindi and al Ghazali - Islamic thinkers who were influenced by Aristotle and developed the argument to explain God’s creation of the universe. 20th Century – William Lane Craig – American Christian The Kalam argument is cosmological because it seeks to prove that God was the first cause of the universe.

Summary of the Kalam Argument – page 4 Whatever comes into being must have a cause The universe came into being The universe must have a cause If the universe has a cause of its existence it must be God God exists Supporters of this theory believe God created the universe ex nihilo ‘It is an axiom of reason that all that comes to be must have a cause that brings it about. The world has come to be. Ergo the world must have a cause to bring it about’ al Ghazali

The universe must be finite A finite universe had a beginning Kalam- argues that God is the creator of the universe. The universe must be finite A finite universe had a beginning Whatever begins to exist has a cause Therefore the cause must be God

William Lane Craig’s example used to support the Kalam Argument Eg, imagine an infinite set of books in a library A part of an infinite set is equal to the whole of the infinite set, because both the part and the whole are infinite. A count of all the even numbered books is the same as a count of all the books This does not make sense – so the universe can not be infinite

Activities Read pages 4, 5 and 6 Complete tasks 1 and 2 Whatever begins to exist, has a cause of its existence The universe began to exist Therefore the universe has a cause of its existence   Explanation Argument 1 Actual infinite can’t exist Library Argument 2  Actual infinite can’t be formed Write down today's date Write down the year you were born You can count the number of years that have passed since you were born because you have a starting point! You can count how many years it is until your 40th birthday!

Craig concluded that: Task 3 – Reread page 5 and 6 and complete page 7 The history of the universe was formed by one event following on after another event – this is successive addition (birthday example) A collection formed by successive addition cannot be actually infinite Therefore, the universe must have had a beginning in time The argument aims to prove God as the personal creator of the universe. As the laws of nature cannot have existed before the beginning of the universe, the universe cannot be the result of natural causes, Craig claimed - ‘if the universe began to exist, and if the universe is caused, then the cause of the universe must be a personal being who freely chooses to create the world.’ Task 3 – Reread page 5 and 6 and complete page 7

Can you remember what these words mean? Valid A posteriori Sound Inductive A priori Deductive From or after experience or evidence The logic is correct and the premises are true No mistakes in logic If the premises are true the conclusion could still be false If the premises are true the conclusion is true Truth value determined before/without evidence

Kalam knowledge test Kalam Actual Infinity Possible infinity Ex Nihilo Derived from the Latin meaning ‘out of nothing’ An Arabic term which means to speak, argue or discuss It refers to sets or collections of things with an infinite number of members. A part within an actually infinite set is equal to the whole set because it is infinite. Exists if it always possible to add one more to a series of things or events.

Summary – pages 7 and 8 Inductive and a posteriori William Lane Craig’s premises Whatever comes into being must have a cause The universe came into being The universe must have a cause If the universe has a cause of its existence it must be God God exists - Supporters of this theory believe God created the universe ex nihilo 3. Rejection of an actual infinite - The library example 4. Actual infinite can’t be formed - Successive additions 5. The personal creator, the universe cannot be the result of natural causes – frozen water

Consolidating WLC programme Make a note of any additional information http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CulBuMCLg0 Evaluating the argument

Just a MinuteTimer Number ones will ‘volunteer’ to start to speak about the Kalam Cosmological Argument. At the first repetition, pause or mistake another takes over - and so on until the minute is up.

Challenges to the cosmological argument Can you think of any challenges to the cosmological argument? Use page 9 of the Summer Preparation Work Booklet

Revision Activity one - Key word bingo A posteriori Valid Natural theology Aquinas Plato Aristotle Summa Theologica Inductive Deductive Cause Mover Theistic proof Christianity Sound A priori Activity two Either Choose five of the words on the list and put them together into a paragraph – that makes sense – and demonstrates your understanding of meaning Or Choose five of the words that you are unsure about and check your notes from the last lessons and create a key word list