RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discussion on OFDMA in HEW
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date:
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
OFDMA performance in 11ax
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
OFDMA performance in 11ax
January 2012 Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs Date: January 17th, 2012 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone.
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
120MHz channelization solution
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Regarding UL MU protection
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Packet Design for Wake-up Receiver (WUR)
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
MU with Frequency Domain Multiplexing
MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD
UL MU Random Access Analysis
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Enabling Persistent Allocation for EHT
320MHz Channelization and Tone Plan
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Enabling Persistent Allocation for EHT
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Enabling Uplink Persistent Allocation for EHT
LC MAC submission – follow up
LC MAC submission – follow up
EHT Power saving considering multi-link
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Presentation transcript:

RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: 2015-10-23 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Jiseon Lee POSTECH Networking & Distributed Systems Lab., Room 341, PIRL, POSTECH, Hyoja-Dong, Pohang, KOREA, 790-784 82-54-279-5655 happyjskr@postech.ac.kr Cheeha Kim chkim@postech.ac.kr Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

Abstract MU features include UL and DL OFDMA in 11ax SFD [1] November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 Abstract MU features include UL and DL OFDMA in 11ax SFD [1] To improve the channel utilization as much as possible for UL/DL in dense OBSS environment AP functions asymmetrically AP needs to collect STA’s Tx demands to schedule UL MU STAs’ Tx efficiently This contribution proposes effective channel allocation method and efficient STA’s Tx demands report method using RTS*/CTS* (modified RTS/CTS) Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

Backgrounds 802.11ax Spec Framework Document [1] 802.11ac standard November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 Backgrounds 802.11ax Spec Framework Document [1] Multi-user (MU) features include UL and DL OFDMA An UL MU PPDU (MU-MIMO or OFDMA) is sent as an immediate response (IFS TBD) to a Trigger frame (format TBD) sent by the AP 802.11ac standard Mandatory support for 20 MHz, 40 MHz and 80 MHz channel widths Optional support for 160 MHz and 80+80 MHz channel widths RTS/CTS exchange negotiates dynamic bandwidth operation Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

Backgrounds (cont’d) Bandwidth (BW) Dense environments [4] November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 Backgrounds (cont’d) Bandwidth (BW) Non-contiguous BW provides higher gain than contiguous BW [2] Finer granularity of BW occupation (1/2, 1/4, 1/8 of 20MHz ) [3] Dense environments [4] Configuration control by the AP can help the overall interference situation AP could control the use of RTS/CTS for STAs associated with the AP in a way that optimizes network resources Dense OBSS environments [5] AP and STAs might see the busy/idle state of secondary channels differently RTS/CTS have no functionalities compensating unused secondary bands Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

Motivation To utilize channels as much as possible For DL-OFDMA November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 Motivation To utilize channels as much as possible For DL-OFDMA Allocate all the channels if possible For UL-OFDMA, Collect STA’s Tx demands efficiently Schedule channel allocation based on STA’s TX demands Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

RTS* - CTS* Configurations November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 RTS* - CTS* Configurations RTS* AP/STA initiates transmission with RTS* Format is the same as the legacy RTS Subtype value may be defined for RTS* CTS* CTS* is issued in response to RTS* Every STA is associated exclusively with a sub-channel (tone unit) within 20 MHz at association operation 20 MHz OFDMA building blocks can carry a mix of different tone unit sizes within each 242 tone unit boundary [1] CTS* is sent using associated sub-channel in each 20 MHz band Function of CTS* is the same as the original CTS’s plus reporting Tx demand But implemented CTS* may contain only Tx demand reports Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

AP-initiated Coordination November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 AP-initiated Coordination DL-OFDMA in dense OBSS environment AP sends a copy of RTS * in every 20 MHz band Receiving STAs respond with CTS* for each accessible 20 MHz band Based on CTS*, AP arranges DL-OFDMA channels AP is to schedule DL to meet equal data length requirement STA’s Tx demands are reported in CTS* as well for UL-OFDMA scheduling UL-OFDMA in dense OBSS environment Trigger* frame contains channel allocation information Trigger* must be equal to CTS* in length Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

AP-initiated Coordination (cont’d) November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 AP-initiated Coordination (cont’d) Time DIFS Back-off 20 MHz 160 MHz CTS* 1 RTS* DL DATA → STA1 DL DATA → STA3 DL DATA → STA2 CTS* 2 CTS* 3 ACK Trigger* STA1 → UL DATA STA3 → UL DATA STA2 → UL DATA DL: To STA 1 DL data can receive & UL: To AP 40 MHz UL: To AP 80 MHz Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

STA-initiated Coordination November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 STA-initiated Coordination UL-OFDMA in dense OBSS environment Unrequested channels may be allocated based on outstanding Tx demands using trigger* along with CTS* Trigger* structure is the same as CTS* UL STA Tx address is defined Time DIFS Back-off 20 MHz 160 MHz 40 MHz UL: To AP DATA ACK RTS* Trigger for unrequested 120 MHz UL CTS* Trigger* Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 Conclusion Using modified RTS/CTS coordination, efficient DL/UL-OFDMA transmission can be scheduled Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH

References [1] 802.11-15/0132-06-00ax-spec-framework November 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/xxxxr0 November 2015 References [1] 802.11-15/0132-06-00ax-spec-framework [2] 802.11-13/1058r0 Efficient wider bandwidth operation [3] 802.11-15/0354r1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation [4] 802.11-15/0059r1 Uplink RTS/CTS Control [5] 802.11-14/1442r1 Considerations on DL OFDMA control mechanism Jiseon Lee, POSTECH Jiseon Lee, POSTECH