From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
PORTFOLIO.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Completing the School Systems Review. Directions and resources for conducting a School Systems Review Checklist for.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Session Materials  Wiki
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Draft Completing the School Systems Review 12/22/2014.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
Crown Point Schools Systems Accreditation November 24, 2014.
Curriculum Instruction Assessment Aligning Manitoba Physical Education Supervisors Association Linda Thorlakson Manitoba Education February 17, 2010.
Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum,
Comprehensive School- Improvement Assessment (CSA) Iowa Association of School Boards IASB.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Collaboration for Professional Learning SCCSD Leadership Academy 2010.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
PLC Guiding Coalition SEPTEMBER 29, Housekeeping  Sign in, credit (check), name tags  8-2, with working lunch at 11:30  Don’t get too comfortable…
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
District Accreditation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
An Introduction to NETS*T
The Year of Core Instruction
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
School Self-Evaluation 
HEALTHY SYSTEMS: A diagnostic tool for your toolkit
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Student Assessment and Evaluation
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Aspiring Principals Program
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT Jay Barrett, GED 621.
Implementation, Monitoring, and NM DASH
Overview of the Intent of the Iowa Core Curriculum
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
Chicago Public Schools
Implementing Race to the Top
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
SEC & State/District Initiatives
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant Russ Robinson, Educational Improvement Consultant

Outcomes School Systems Review Why? – Why should we do it? What? – What should the process look like? How? – How do we utilize the results and develop an action plan which shifts the process, and our thinking, from compliance to impact?

When You Know Your Why, The How Will Come to You! Before we get into the content, it is important to understand why we engage in continuous improvement. Set up the video by explaining that they will see a music teacher sing Amazing Grace in two ways. Have them think about the question, “Why is there a difference?” Following the video, have participants reflect on the question, “What is your “why” around continuous improvement? How will that define your what and how?” Start the video at 1:25. https://youtu.be/4NpZL2M9-x0?t=1m23s www.michigan.gov/schoolimprovement

Why the SSR? The purpose of completing the School Systems Review (SSR) is to engage your staff in meaningful dialogue about school processes that support student achievement. Thoughtful analysis of the research-based indicators from the School Improvement Framework 2.0 can assist staff in identifying system strengths and opportunities for improvement. The School Systems Review is one piece of the comprehensive needs assessment that informs your School Improvement Process.

We BELIEVE that all of you want to build successful schools that promotes exemplary teaching and learning, high level leadership, focused professional development and opportunities to create a strong climate and culture for all of your stakeholders. ! Today’s learning will give you tools and resources in order to achieve this goal in creating your successful school. Are you ready for this learning?

SYSTEMS Study in order to achieve good health…. Body School

School Systems Review/Ed YES____ Strand I Teaching for Learning Standard 1- Curriculum Standard 2- Instruction Standard 3- Assessment * INDICATORS A-J Strand II Leadership for Learning Std. 4-Instrucitonal Leadership Std. 5 – A Culture for Learning Std. 6 – Organizational Management *INDICATORS K-R Stand III Professional Learning Culture Std.7 – Professional Learning culture Std. 8- Professional Learning system *INDICATORS S-V Stand IV School, Family, and Community Relations Std. 9- Communication Std. 10- Engagement *INDICATORS W-Z

Turn, Talk and Rate (1-5) Where are we? The purpose of completing the School Systems Review (SSR) is to engage your staff in meaningful dialogue about school processes that support student achievement? Thoughtful analysis of the research-based indicators from the School Improvement Framework 2.0 can assist staff in identifying system strengths and opportunities for improvement. The School Systems Review is one piece of the comprehensive needs assessment that informs your School Improvement Process.

School Systems Review(SSR)/Ed YES report The School Systems Review is a self-assessment tool to help schools develop a common understanding of the “Big Picture” of their current state, related to Key Strands, Standards and Indicators from the District Improvement Framework 2.0

SIF 2.0 Documents The School Improvement Framework 2.0 Overview The School Systems Review The School Improvement Framework 2.0

School Improvement Framework 2.0

School Systems Review

The “What” Step 1 Read the Guiding Question (for a Standard) in the School Improvement Framework Overview.

Step 2 Dialogue Recording Form Discuss the Guiding Question and record your evidence for how your school is addressing the Guiding Question on the Dialogue Recording Form.

Step 3 Now turn to the corresponding Indicator in the School Systems Review. Begin by reading the “Full Implementation” column. Mark the box for each characteristic for which your school has identified evidence (from dialogue about the Guiding Questions). Starting Point

Step 3 (continued) Read the Sample Evidence listed on the School Systems Review for the Indicator. Check off any evidence listed that you identified and add additional evidence you identified that is not already listed.

Step 3 (continued) Engage in dialogue about which implementation level to select based on evidence. Using evidence that was identified and the characteristics on the School Systems Review, place your school on the continuum for each Indicator.

Engage in dialogue about which implementation level to select based on evidence. Using evidence that was identified and the characteristics on the School Systems Review, place your school on the continuum for each Indicator. Step 3 (continued) If your school has evidence for all the characteristics under “Full Implementation,” consider whether you can move to the right to “Sustained Implementation.” “Sustained Implementation” means that district policies, systems and practices align with and support sustainability of implementation at the school level. If school implementation is not sustained and supported by district policies, systems, and practices, select the third column, “Full Implementation,” by marking the circle at the top of the column. If your school does not have evidence for all the characteristics under “Full Implementation,” move to the left and consider selecting “Partial Implementation” or “Beginning Implementation.” Check the criteria in the first or second columns and mark the corresponding circle at the top of the implementation level you select.

Step 3 (continued) On the Dialogue Recording Form, make notes of key points of discussion that occurs while placing your school on the continuum. These notes will be useful in the school improvement planning process.

Shifting from Compliance to Impact As a team, review each SYSTEM and Indicator from the School Systems Review Using the format and resources provided, engage in dialogue about the processes and evidence your school has in place related to the chosen SYSTEM and Indicators Based on the evidence-based dialogue and discussion, arrive at a consensus as to the progress of the school in the chosen indicator and identify the level of implementation. Prepare an ACTION PLAN using the Dialogue Recording Form. Sample evidence and the Indicators outlined in the Full Implementation column Completed ACTION Plan implemented successfully, will move the school closer to the desired practice. ,

Closing and Feedback