Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos, Emilio Salinas  Neuron 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Advertisements

Decoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Lixia Gao, Kevin Kostlan, Yunyan Wang, Xiaoqin Wang  Neuron 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
Gaby Maimon, John A. Assad  Neuron  Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos  Neuron 
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
René Quilodran, Marie Rothé, Emmanuel Procyk  Neuron 
Satoru Suzuki, Marcia Grabowecky  Neuron 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Coding of the Reach Vector in Parietal Area 5d
Reaches to Sounds Encoded in an Eye-Centered Reference Frame
Two-Dimensional Substructure of MT Receptive Fields
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz  Neuron 
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Minami Ito, Gerald Westheimer, Charles D Gilbert  Neuron 
Injecting Instructions into Premotor Cortex
Braden A. Purcell, Roozbeh Kiani  Neuron 
Transformation of Perception from Sensory to Motor Cortex
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
An Optimal Decision Population Code that Accounts for Correlated Variability Unambiguously Predicts a Subject’s Choice  Federico Carnevale, Victor de Lafuente,
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Satoru Suzuki, Marcia Grabowecky  Neuron 
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages e7 (December 2017)
José Vergara, Natsuko Rivera, Román Rossi-Pool, Ranulfo Romo  Neuron 
Effect of Expected Reward Magnitude on the Response of Neurons in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque  Matthew I. Leon, Michael N. Shadlen 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)
Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
Motor Learning with Unstable Neural Representations
Ju Tian, Naoshige Uchida  Neuron 
Neural Correlates of Reaching Decisions in Dorsal Premotor Cortex: Specification of Multiple Direction Choices and Final Selection of Action  Paul Cisek,
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Triple Function of Synaptotagmin 7 Ensures Efficiency of High-Frequency Transmission at Central GABAergic Synapses  Chong Chen, Rachel Satterfield, Samuel.
Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Ryo Sasaki, Takanori Uka  Neuron  Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Segregation of Object and Background Motion in Visual Area MT
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Guilhem Ibos, David J. Freedman  Neuron 
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (January 2002)
Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos, Ranulfo Romo  Neuron 
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Sara E. Morrison, Alexandre Saez, Brian Lau, C. Daniel Salzman  Neuron 
Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping?
Local Origin of Field Potentials in Visual Cortex
Phase Locking of Single Neuron Activity to Theta Oscillations during Working Memory in Monkey Extrastriate Visual Cortex  Han Lee, Gregory V. Simpson,
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Visual selection: Neurons that make up their minds
Neurophysiology: Electrically evoking sensory experience
Gregor Rainer, Earl K Miller  Neuron 
Colin J. Akerman, Darragh Smyth, Ian D. Thompson  Neuron 
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Lixia Gao, Kevin Kostlan, Yunyan Wang, Xiaoqin Wang  Neuron 
Population Responses to Contour Integration: Early Encoding of Discrete Elements and Late Perceptual Grouping  Ariel Gilad, Elhanan Meirovithz, Hamutal.
Jan Benda, André Longtin, Leonard Maler  Neuron 
Matthew I Leon, Michael N Shadlen  Neuron 
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Matthew R. Roesch, Adam R. Taylor, Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Neuron 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Correlated Neuronal Discharges that Increase Coding Efficiency during Perceptual Discrimination  Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos, Emilio Salinas  Neuron  Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 649-657 (May 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00287-3

Figure 1 Discrimination Task (A) Sequence of events during discrimination trials. The mechanical probe is lowered, indenting the fingertip of one digit of the restrained hand (PD); the monkey places its free hand on an immovable key (KD); the probe oscillates vertically at the base stimulus frequency; after a delay, a second mechanical vibration is delivered at the comparison frequency; and the monkey releases the key (KU) and presses either a lateral or a medial push button (PB) to indicate whether the comparison frequency was higher or lower than the base. (B) Stimulus set used during recordings. Each box indicates a base/comparison frequency pair, with numbers inside the boxes showing overall percent of correct discriminations. Comparison frequencies above and below a fixed base frequency of 20 Hz (gray boxes) were used to construct psychometric curves. (C) Location of recording sites (black strip at right) in secondary somatosensory cortex (S2); CS, central sulcus; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; LS, lateral sulcus. Neuron 2003 38, 649-657DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00287-3)

Figure 2 Examples of Neuronal Responses in S2 Responses analyzed were evoked by the first (f1) and second (f2) stimulus frequencies during the vibrotactile discrimination task. (A) Raster plots of an S2 neuron with positive slope. Each row of ticks is a trial, and each tick is an action potential. Trials were delivered in random order. Labels at left and right indicate f1 and f2, in Hz. (B) Mean firing rate (±SD) as a function of f1 and f2; S, slope value. (C) Psychometric and neurometric functions for the responses in (B). Continuous curves are sigmoidal fits (χ2, p < 0.001) to the data points for 11 pairs of stimulus frequencies in which f1 was fixed at 20 Hz. y axis is equivalent to the probability that f2 is judged higher than f1. Gray line is psychometric function (subject's performance); black line is neurometric function (ideal observer's performance). PT, psychometric threshold, in Hz; NT, neurometric threshold, in Hz; TR, threshold ratio (PT/NT). (D–F) Same format as in panels on the left, but for a neuron with negative slope. Neuron 2003 38, 649-657DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00287-3)

Figure 3 Psychometric/Neurometric Threshold Ratios Distribution of threshold ratios for n = 99 S2 neurons studied during the discrimination task; μ, mean threshold ratio. Neuron 2003 38, 649-657DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00287-3)

Figure 4 Increase in Discrimination Capacity after Subtraction of Opposite S2 Responses (A) Firing rates of a neuron with positive slope. Open and filled circles indicate rates evoked during f1 (fixed at 20 Hz) and f2, respectively. (B) Neurometric function for the responses in (A). y axis corresponds to performance of the ideal observer. (C) Firing rates for a neuron with negative slope. (D) Neurometric function for the responses in (C). (E) Responses obtained by subtracting the firing rates in (A) (r+) minus those in (C) (r−) plus a constant (differential offset, DO). Open circles correspond to r+(f1) − r− (f1) + DO, whereas filled circles correspond to r+(f2) − r− (f2) + DO. (F) Neurometric function computed from the subtracted data in (E) (curve is independent of DO). Note the increase in performance and the corresponding lower threshold. NT, neurometric threshold; S, slope. Neuron 2003 38, 649-657DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00287-3)

Figure 5 Threshold Ratios for Combined Pairs of S2 Responses (A) Distribution of threshold ratios for responses generated by subtraction. For each pair of units with positive and negative slopes and recorded separately, a neurometric function was generated from the difference in rates. The threshold ratio was equal to the lower psychometric threshold measured while studying the pair, divided by the neurometric threshold. (B) The x axis shows the threshold ratios generated by subtraction using only the 18 pairs of neurons that were recorded simultaneously and had opposite slopes. The y axis shows threshold ratios obtained from the same 18 pairs but with correlations removed, as if they had been recorded in different sessions. The diagonal line indicates equality; μ, mean threshold ratio, μ′, mean threshold ratio with correlations removed. Neuron 2003 38, 649-657DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00287-3)